Monday, March 31, 2014

Victor Atherton who Is Over Sally Schroer



April 10 2013 AB phone conversation with Victor Atherton Lead child Protection Investigator 

Its important to note he is over The violent Case worker Who almost killed a former child rape survivor and caused her hildren massive psychological injuries due to her hate of their mother.

 
AB- your job is to build trust after children are removed. The caseworker deceived the client rather than be up front with him. 
Victor Atherton - We managed to find a legal loophole. 

AB- you actively looked for a way to deceive a member of the family you are trying to help? If you deceive one you have now become untrustworthy to the rest .........

AB Is there a reason you felt it was appropriate to intentionally deceive versus being upfront with your clients that you are or should be helping.

Victor Atherton- we managed to find a legal loophole.

AB- What??
_______________________________________________________________________________________
According to human service policy and procedure these two individuals should have been removed from the mothers case because they have unresolved mental issues that prevent them from helping her. 


 




Sally Schroer Told her Your House Is Not Nice Enough


Completely fenced in 

Card Board Box to Law suit & Criminal Charges Phase


Sunday, March 30, 2014

CAN I SUE CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES FOR DRAGGING MY NAME? In this situation you can go after the social worker individually

CAN I SUE CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES FOR DRAGGING MY NAME?

http://www.worldlawdirect.com/forum/civil-litigation/55166-can-i-sue-child-protective-services-dragging-my-name.html

I wish to inform you that action may be taken against social worker and not CPS. In this regard the social worker had misled court by false accusation thus social worker may be held guilty of misleading court. You may show evidence through conduct of social worker that there has been intentional wrong statement. You may initiate contempt of court or perjury proceedings against social worker.

False Criminal charges of criminal child endangerment which requires evidence of physical harm or psychological damage measured with a diagnostic assessment.

I will be posting the three or four letters sent to  (Jason Moran Le Center City Attorney asking him to stand down on prosecuting the mother  for the false charge in which he had no evidence to support his findings. Something correctable with an educational brochure and an explanation that the school endangers children with a special pass (Victor Atherton)  is not a criminal act.


Jason Moran said this is not perjury
April 11th 2013 Documented phone call-Welcome  Manor
AB: I was just calling to verify that you did or did not have beds for Eugenie Harris and her three children.
Welcome  Manor Employee Rita: Yes we did.
AB: Thank you







Case worker altered paper work to non relative so the judge would not get the family paperwork 
Disabled Mother is not discriminated against (Jason Moran Le Center City Attorney)
The termination of parental rights order Authored by Sally Schroer. 
Mother Failed to Maintain Housing

From October through January case plan has the following services listed that will be provided by the county

December 2012 Finding of facts does not mention cut services


Below is Schroers courtroom testimony on how long Sally Schroer had that service in place they were cut without Notice to the family. 



Its Sally Schroers job to notify the family and assist making other arrangements for the family and help her find replacement housing. Below is  how she helped in her notes.





                                                         Sally Schroer testimony






January 2013 the mother learns Schroer cut the service from the landlord and that she is being evicted.
All the case plans still show housing listed as a service and that it is in tact.
Eugenie Harris questioned Schroer about what happened and again asks for assistance from Schroer.
Schroer  replied I am done helping you. Eugenie Harris had no time to make arrangements to prevent homelessness.
Schroer writes in the TPR failed to maintain housing

January 14 2013 
Eugenie Harris  has a break down and consumes nearly a full bottle of alcohol in her home that nearly killed her. Trauma Survivors will have breakdowns if they are being abused. The breakdowns often look like bad behavior. The County charges her with disturbing the peace for being to loud in her Apartment. 



Friday, March 28, 2014

More kids being abused in the care of child protection for the first time in their life just like these three children and their mother are being abused

http://www.myfoxboston.com/story/25070872/permanent-custody-of-justina-pelletier-awarded-to-mass

TRUE HEROS ARE WILLING TO ACT  AS SUPPORT AND SHOW TRAUMA SURVIVORS FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THEIR LIVES THEY ARE VALUABLE AND THEY MATTER. THEN THERE ARE PEOPLE LIKE THE TONY DOBMEIER AND MELISSA DOBMEIER WHO WILL RAPE SOMEONE  WHO IS VULNERABLE OF HER CHILDREN AND PRETEND THEY ARE HEROES. WITH NO REGARD FOR THE RAPE SURVIVORS LIFE

THEY BRUTALLY TERRORIZE CHILDREN WHO SAY THEY WOULD RATHER BE DEAD THAN LIVE WITH TONY DOBMEIER.

TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER ARE AND HAVE BEEN ABUSING THREE CHILDREN HOW DO WE KNOW THEY DID NOT DEVELOP SYMPTOMS OF ABUSE UNTIL SALLY SHROER VIOLENTLY ASSAULTED THEM AND THE DOBMEIERS TOOK IT FROM THERE BREAKING THEM DOWN.

Neglected children   may experience delays in physical and psychosocial development, possibly resulting in psychopathology and impaired neuropsychological functions including executive functionattentionprocessing speed, language, memory and social skills.[43] Researchers investigating maltreated children have repeatedly found that neglected children in foster and adoptive populations manifest different emotional and behavioral reactions to regain lost or secure relationships and are frequently reported to have disorganized attachments and a need to control their environment. 

Reports of three happy healthy children are made just the day before.The only existing issue is lack of transportation and lack of a phone due to poverty which is causing a problem for the single mother of three. No sign or evidence of  physical abuse or maltreatment is found.

According to the case plan all the abuse was the the result of Sally Shroer breaking in to the home and terrorizing the family and later almost killing EugenIe Harris. The children develop serious behavioral issues. 


Such children are not likely to view caregivers as being a source of safety, and instead typically show an increase in aggressive and hyperactive behaviors which may disrupt healthy or secure attachment with their adopted parents. 

The reason five psychologist all agreed the couple they were placed with was high risk to abuse is because they are ignoring the needs of three healthy children. They could care less if Eugenie Harris is dead or alive. They could care less if the children are in agony. 

Their only priority is themselves, otherwise they would have supported the safety net that came along that would have preserved their relationship with their mother who was only in need of education and who is an amazing caregiver with the elderly and children.  Tony and Melissa Dobmeier only supported their ability to continue mind screwing the three children rather than meet the childrens needs. Rather than see them happy and reunited in a safe environment until their mother could earn custody back.


Wednesday, March 26, 2014

May 14 Child and Family Policy Forum: Children Whose Parents Have Experienced Childhood Trauma -- Challenges, Obligations, and Reasonable Efforts for Reunification

We have requested that they review our scanned files of Schroers chronology reports complete with recordings and emails lawyers protecting the violence against the trauma survivor. To include other key officials. Along with the rest of the organized crime by officials who are in place to protect the vulnerable

 assistant a.http://www.chapinhall.org/may14policyforum

Look what happens after sally Schroers violent attack on the children

Age four and six they are so disturbed after the psychological terror that Sally Schroer put them through as a result of her violent behavior.With approval of Victor Atherton,  Lowell Freeman, Susan rynda, and Darrell pettis.They are all in agreement that if Schroer had broken in with out consent and interviewed a child and then broke in again, going through closets and dressers and testifying she searched a home from top to bottom again without a warrant probable  Cause. Then she tells the mother going to the bathroom is a crime if children are in the home and she would be removing the children. 

the abuse caseworker documents happy healthy children prior to her iolene against a disabled mother for being poor and three small children. Approved of by Victor Atherton Lowell Freeman Sue Rynda and Darrell Pettis  the county commissioner.


Also county attorneys said the abuse and violence against vulnerable citizens is not a crime. So they placed fraudulent charges against the mother. Below is the result of Tony Dobmeier and Melissa Dobmeier care and it was approved by Victor Atherton,  Lowell Freeman, Susan Rynda, and Darrell pettis whom seem to agree poverty is a crime. 
  

Tuesday, March 25, 2014

If you have had a child removed by CPS/JV court and they stated that "reasonable efforts were made" to prevent or eliminate the need for removal - but reasonable efforts were NOT made - they are committing fraud to get federal funding-

PLEASE report it to the feds.
  • The number is 800-447-8477 then option #5.
  • Having the names of the SS workers and judge who did it will make it go quicker (also their contact numbers).
I made my report and it only took a few minutes. I told the intake gal that this is not an isolated incident (because it isn't). There is strength in numbers, so do report this if it happened to you.

~Advice from AFRa facebook page.

Thursday, March 20, 2014

CPS Stalking, Fraud, Orders For Babies, Forced Adoption Confirmed: OIG, News32 P4 2007


STALKING
CB ARRIVED AT THE COURTHOUSE ON FOOT (SALLY SCHROER)
DID YOU REALLY THINK YOU WOULD NOT BE NOTICED WALKING ALL OVER TOWN (VICTOR  ATHERTON)
FUNDING

PLACING ORDERS FOR CHILDREN 
FALSE ALLEGATIONS



TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS ORDER AUTHORED BY SALLY SCHROER APPROVED BY VICTOR ATHERTON AND HEAD OF HUMAN SERVICES SUSAN RYNDA


APPEAL ARGUMENT 


FORCED ADOPTION TO COUNTY ATTORNEY CHILDLESS RELATIVES 
AND CHILDREN WHO WISH DEATH BECAUSE THE DOBMEIERS ASKED COUNTY OFFICIALS TO TAKE THEM AWAY FROM THEIR MOTHER 

PTSD Tony Dobmeier Mentally abuses healthy children never abused to get his needs met






Wednesday, March 19, 2014

Megan Gaudette

Assistant County Attorney/Associate at Christian, Moran, Keogh & King
Decided it was in the best interest to isolate a trauma survivor so that Sally Schroer could continue to abuse the disabled parent. The county attorney has childless family members looking to own poor kids and are willing to cause the death of a mother so their needs can be met. They also admitted to emotional torture of the children to get their needs met. 


This is scarry!!!!!
I will be focusing on juvenile protection, juvenile delinquency, civil commitments, and guardianships/conservatorships for the Le Sueur County Attorney's Office, and will also have the opportunity to do private client work.

she is dangerous we have been un successful in getting the state bar to take this seriously but now we have the state saying Harris is a vulnerable adult and release of information needs to be honored.
  •  What are some examples of judicial 
    Some examples are:
  • misconduct?
  • Improper courtroom demeanor or improper treatment of parties, counsel, witnesses, jurors, court staff and others

  • Failing to promptly dispose of judicial business
  • Conflict of interest
Baxter Rules in favor of only the county despite the criminal activity behind their actions



Baxter is guilty of the above 


  • Chemical abuse
  • Engaging in improper election campaign activities

Tuesday, March 18, 2014

Caretaker is unable/unwilling to meet the child’s minimum medical,
food, clothing, shelter needs for reasons other than poverty

Children are removed for 100% poverty related reasons 

In criteria required to determine child maltreatment: There must be proof of psychological or physical injury to the child.

was  maltreatment determined? 
YES
What kind of diagnostic tool or expert was used to determine 
psychological injury?
 None 

What  psychological injury was found ?
None 
What expert determined the physical injury was the result of child abuse or maltreatment. 
None 

Adapted from Minn. Stat. 256F.07;
Part 9560.0220, subpart 9
Criteria for Seeking Child’s Removal from Home XVI-4356
Before seeking removal of a child from their home, the local social services agency must
evaluate the following:

1. Whether the child is an Indian child as defined in Minn. Stat. 260C.007, subd. 24; if so, the
local agency must follow the process for removal of an Indian child, which is described in
SSM XVI-4356.02. 

NOT DONE


2. Has the local agency made reasonable efforts to provide services that are:
a. relevant to the safety and protection of the child; 

NO

b. adequate to meet the needs of the child and family;
c. culturally appropriate; NO
d. available and accessible;NO
e. consistent and timely;NO
f. realistic under the circumstances.MN Department of Human Services Social Services Manual NO

Children’s Protective Services XVI-4000
Based on statutes and rules in effect as of 08/01/2000
3. In the case of child maltreatment, can the alleged perpetrator be removed from the child’s
home?
4. Are the child and child’s caregiver informed of the services the local agency offers and are
the services accepted?         NO


Children’s Protective Services XVI-4000
Based on statutes and rules in effect as of 08/01/2000
2. The local agency must determine whether a voluntary placement provides for the child’s health, safety, and welfare. 

Was this a voluntary placement?
NO

3. If the child is not placed voluntarily, and the child is in imminent danger, the local agency
must:
a. obtain the emergency removal of the child from the home by:
(1) seeking the assistance of the law enforcement agency to take the child into
immediate custody; or
(2) petitioning the juvenile court for immediate legal custody of the child; or
b. if the child is placed with a relative or in a shelter facility, advise the person taking the
child into custody, or the court, whether disclosure of the child’s location would
endanger the child.

Was there Imminent danger ?
NO
4. If the child is not placed voluntarily and the child is not in imminent danger, the local agency must ask the county attorney to petition the juvenile court for placement of the child
under the DHS Foster Care Rule, Parts 9560.0500 to 9560.0670.
5. Under Minn. Stat. 256F.07, subd. 1, when a child is placed on an emergency basis for alleged maltreatment, the local agency must review the placement to determine the services

necessary to allow the child to return home.

Did the county find and determine maltreatment based on the required criteria with professional experts or diagnostic tools  
NO
 was imminent danger found to be a factor 
NO
were the children returned home
NO
Caretaker is unable/unwilling to meet the child’s minimum medical,
food, clothing, shelter needs for reasons other than poverty

Children are removed for 100% poverty related reasons 

Monday, March 17, 2014

256M.70 FISCAL LIMITATIONS.

Subdivision 1.


Subd. 2.Identification of services to be provided.


If a county has made reasonable efforts to provide services according to the service plan under section 256M.30, but funds appropriated for purposes of sections256M.01 to 256M.80 are insufficient, then the county may limit services that do not meet the following criteria while giving the highest funding priority to clauses (1) and (2):
(1) services needed to protect individuals from maltreatment, abuse, and neglect;
(2) emergency and crisis services needed to protect clients from physical, emotional, or psychological harm;
(3) services that maintain a person in the person's home or least restrictive setting;
(4) assessment of persons applying for services and referral to appropriate services when necessary; and
(5) public guardianship services.

Subd. 3.Denial, reduction, or termination of services due to fiscal limitations.


Before a county denies, reduces, or terminates services to an individual due to fiscal limitations, the county must meet the requirements in this section. The county must notify the individual and the individual's guardian in writing of the reason for the denial, reduction, or termination of services and must inform the individual and the individual's guardian in writing that the county will, upon request, meet to discuss alternatives before services are terminated or reduced.

Sally said she cut the housing without notice because it was too expensive in her notes and in court.  While she continued to send case plans that included housing support. When the family was notified of the case workers criminal intent to harm Genie there was no time to prevent homelessness. as sally had planned. This was listed in a policy and procedure complaint that the Commissioner of Le Sueur County human services  SUE RYNDA  also supported by Darrell Pettis the County Commissioner.  He has opted to support the abuse of a trauma survivor which took place with the approval of Sue Rynda. Rynda insisted the mother with a disability be isolated for exploitation purposes so that children could be provided to the county attorneys childless family members.    

Saturday, March 15, 2014

SUE RYNDA FAILED TO REPORT THE ABUSE AND NEAR FATAL INCIDENT OF A PARENT WITH A DISABILITY CAUSED BY SALLY SCHROER

THE REQUEST FOR AN INVESTIGATION WAS RESPONDED TO BY COUNTY COMMISSIONER DARRELL PETTIS BY HANGING UP ON THE CALLER


  SUE RYNDA ALSO FAILED TO REPORT THE NEAR FATAL INCIDENT OF EUGENIE HARRIS TO THE STATE.  THAT RESULTED IN HER CASE WORKER GROSSLY ABUSING A TRAUMA SURVIVOR TO REPARENT HER CHILDREN.

WHEN CASE WORKERS ARE WILLING TO KILL TO PUSH A PRODUCT sALLY sHROER AND AND CARI KRENIK SEE TO HAVE LITTLE INTEREST IN THE WELLBEING OF THE MOTHER WHO HAS BEEN DIAGNOSED WITH A DISABILITY.  BOTH PUT HER IN THE HOSPITAL NUMEROUS TIMES TO PUSH A PRODUCT

When making a

MINNESOTA HUAN SERVICE

determination of maltreatment-

pattern can only be used for proven accounts that have not yet been corrected by an agency

Any other accounts where an agency has corrected the problem and have  not  been repeated also do not count

ALSO MUST HAVE PROOF OF PHYSICAL OR PSYCHOLOGICAL HARM

FOR EXAMPLE

18-24 IN SEVERITY LEVEL AS THEY ALIENATED THE NON ABUSIVE MOTHER WHO CARES FOR THE ELDERLY FOR A LIVING 


Thursday, March 13, 2014

Cameron Calob and Rylyn Your Family Loves You and They are NEVER Going to STOP Fighting to Rescue you from the child predators

HANG IN THERE BABIES WE ARE SORRY THAT YOU ARE BEING TORMENTED BY THE PREDATORS WHO SOLICITED THE JUDGE FOR YOUR SALE

How does OCR investigate a civil rights complaint?

Answer:

100+ PAGES OF EVIDENCE HAS BEEN SENT OF ALL SERVICES CUT AND DENIED WITH OUT NOTICE
ALSO ALL REQUESTS REQUESTS THAT CASE WORKER FAILED TO RESPOND TO HOUSING JOB TRAINING PARENT CHILD THERAPY PARENT CLASSES. ALL REQUESTS SUE RYNDA FAILED TO RESPONDED TO AND COUNTY COMMISSIONER DARRELL PETTIS WITH THE ALL DATES INCLUDED AND RECORDINGS OF DARRELL PETTIS GETTING PISSED OFF WHEN A REQUEST FOR AN INVESTIGATION WAS MADE DUE TO SCHROERS BRUTALITY ALMOST KILLING EUGENIE HARRIS NOTES FRO TWO PSYCHOLOGISTS SUPPORTING AND IDENTIFYING THE BREAKDOWN PAPERWORK SHOWING THE COUNTY CRIMINALLY CHARGED HER FOR BEING TO LOUD DURING THE BREAK DOWN A SHRINK SHOWING THAT IT WAS A BREAK DOWN EVIDENCE OF SCHROER BRUTALIZING AN EARLIER VICTIM IN 2001 WITH THE Same DISABILITY. ALSO  INCLUDED IS  WHAT WAS ACCOMPLISHED WHEN SOMEONE ONE WHO DOES NOT SEE DISABILITY AS A PLAGUE ON SOCIETY WHO STEPS IN AND DOES THE CASE WORKERS JOB. 

EVERYTHING ON THE LIST WAS DONE IN FIVE WEEKS WITH A PERSON WHO KNOWS WHAT SALLY SCHROERS JOB IS AND ACTUALLY DOES IT. SALLY SCHROER DID NOT SEE HER CLIENT AS A HUMAN BEING.  

IT IS ESSENTIAL TO NOT HAVE SOCIOPATHS WORKING IN THE HUMAN SERVICE FIELD. THEY HAVE NEARLY KILLED A TEENAGER WITH VICTOR ATHERTON AS THE LEAD INVESTIGATOR. ATHERTONS GUIDANCE ALSO ALMOST CAUSED THE DEATHS OF TWO TRAUMA SURVIVORS. 

SGO DID AND STILL IS RAISING HER CHILDREN THANK GOD 

100% POVERTY RELATED ISSUE ADDED MN MALTREATMENT SCREENING GUIDELINES THAT SAY POVERTY RELATED ISSUE MUST NEVER BE LABELED MALTREATMENT NO IMMINENT DANGER AND DENIED SERVICES PRIOR TO REMOVAL WHICH THEY ARE CURRENTLY COLLECTING FEDERAL FUNDS FOR. FAMILY NOT ONCE CONSIDERED AND ALTERED PAPERWORK BY KRENIK SENT. WHICH COULD SHUT DOWN FEDERAL FUNDING TO THE ENTIRE STATE OF MN FOR FOSTER CARE

At the conclusion of an investigation, the HHS Office for Civil Rights issues a closure letter, which presents OCR's decision on whether there has been a violation of a federal statute or regulation. If there is a violation finding, the recipient is then allowed a specific time period, usually 60 days, to correct the violation or provide OCR with a plan of correction. Corrective action may involve a change in policy or procedure, provision of a service, reinstatement to a job, back pay, restoration of lost benefits, or a notice to clients and employees that a recipient has taken steps to comply with a federal statute or regulation. 
If a recipient is unwilling to take corrective action to come into compliance, OCR will recommend that enforcement proceedings be initiated. A final decision upholding a finding of a violation may result in the termination of Federal financial assistance to the recipient.

Tuesday, March 11, 2014

Can a judge court order a signature on a child protection case plan? No.... Judge M Michael Baxter may be the only judge in the US that has that power


Can a judge court order a signature on a child protection case plan 


According to schroer's notes and the finding of facts along with numerous interviews; Baxter court orders the signature on a case plan. That allows searches unrelated to the relevant facts.




 The court has no authority to force anyone to sign anything. They can tell them that if they don't agree to some kind of compromise, then the court will rule however it sees fit, which could mean the mother loses her parental rights. The mother needs an attorney ASAP, whether it is a public defender or a private attorney.
We can be reached at 507.334.0155 (Toll Free: 888.777.5009). Our web address is: www. corbin-law-office.com.... more

Asked 6 months ago - Owatonna, MN
Parents refused to sign off on a child protection case plan. The judge orders the mother to sign



PRO



  1. Contributor Level 9

1



  1. Lawyer agrees
    Answered I am not aware of any authority to make a person sign, but failure to sign is failure to cooperate and failure to cooperate often leads to a decision to terminate rights. it is usually better to make sure you understand the plan and if there are concerns discuss them with the child protection persons. You should have a public defender or private attorney.
    The opinions in this answer are based upon limited facts. Specific facts can change advice and answers provided.... more


ATTORNEY ANSWERS (3)



  1. PRO


    Contributor Level 18

    4

    Lawyers agree
    Answered If you're talking a safety plan as part of a juvenile proceeding, I'm not aware a judge can force a signature. That said, the threat of permanent termination of parental rights is looming in the background if the parent does not comply with the safety plan. That's a powerful motivator even if it technically doesn't force a signature. Mother should get an attorney to help her if she doesn't appreciate this risk.
    Disclaimer: This email message in no way creates an attorney client relationship between Majeski Law, LLC and the... more