That is probably why when conducting interviews with 2 other counties they seemed shocked that Le Sueur County denied it based on an attempt to protect Sally Schroer from the crimes she committed.
Lowell Freeman actually refused to pull Schroer from Genies case even after he was given evidence the worker was committing Crimes against her, shouting degrading comments....
So awhile back I was listening in on the line when Ms Bracken managed to contact Krenik Krenik's tone changed when she heard who it was
Ms Bracken tells her the Eugenie has a right to have someone with her at all times.. Bracken wants to know why they are saying she may not have someone with her?
Krenik responds "WE ALL AGREE" that she is to be isolated
Krenik-the GAL and County officials all agree
Bracken- agree that she is to be isolated? please explain the reason for why"WE ALL AGREE" it is best for someone with a disability to be isolated and exploited
Krenik- "WE ALL AGREE" if you don't like it hire an attorney and stop me
what I found interesting about that is when a child is removed from a parent, there simply is no such thing as not having an explanation for your actions.
IT IS A VIOLATION OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT, LAWS, MORALS AND ETHICS
WHAT I FOUND TO BE ABSOLUTELY AMAZING WAS "WE ALL AGREE" IS WHY THE JUDGE KEPT THESE CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE! THERE IS ZERO LEGAL REASONS FOR THESE KIDS TO BE IN FOSTER CARE. THEY ARE THERE AS A RESULT OF A COUNTY OFFICIAL COMMITTING A CRIME AGAINST AN ENTIRE FAMILY..
THE FIRST HEARING THEY DECIDE BECAUSE THE PARENTS TESTED POSITIVE FOR THC GAVE THE THE RIGHT TO HOLD THESE CHILDREN IN THE MENTALLY UNSTABLE COUPLES CARE
YOU CANNOT KEEP CHILDREN IN FOSTER ARE FOR A PARENT TESTING POSITIVE FOR THC THAT IS A VIOLATION OF THE LAW AND AGAIN SHOWS HOW DAN DANGEROUS THESE PEOPLE ARE BECAUSE EACH FAMILY MEMBER HAD EXPERIENCED A MENTAL BREAK DOWN AND ENDED UP HOMELESS.
THE REST OF THE FINDINGS ARE WE ALL AGREE