Tuesday, January 14, 2014

IT WAS EVIDENT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE WAS TRYING TO TAKE THE MOTHER DOWN

NICHOLETTE COUNTY PERJURED JUST ABOUT THE ENTIRE APPEAL ARGUMENT I WILL CHECK CODES OF CONDUCT WITH THE STATE BAR THEY HAVE THE SAME INFO I HAVE YET WILLFULLY LIED TO PROGRESS A SALE OF A PARENTS CHILD THESE PEOPLE ARE NOT THEIR TO DO THIS TO PEOPLE IN THE COUNTY THEY ARE THERE TO MAKE SURE JUSTICE IS SEVERED

[11] The disclosure of a client’s false testimony can result in grave consequences to the client,
including not only a sense of betrayal but also loss of the case and perhaps a prosecution for perjury. But
the alternative is that the lawyer cooperate in deceiving the court, thereby subverting the truth-finding
process which the adversary system is designed to implement. See Rule 1.2(d). Furthermore, unless it is
clearly understood that the lawyer will act upon the duty to disclose the existence of false evidence, the
client can simply reject the lawyer’s advice to reveal the false evidence and insist that the lawyer keep
silent. Thus the client could in effect coerce the lawyer into being a party to fraud on the court.
Preserving Integrity of Adjudicative Process
[12] Lawyers have a special obligation to protect a tribunal against criminal or fraudulent
conduct that undermines the integrity of the adjudicative process, such as bribing, intimidating or
otherwise unlawfully communicating with a witness, juror, court official or other participant in the
proceeding, unlawfully destroying or concealing documents or other evidence or failing to disclose
information to the tribunal when required by law to do so. Thus, paragraph (b) requires a lawyer to take
reasonable remedial measures, including disclosure if necessary, whenever the lawyer knows that a
person, including the lawyer’s client, intends to engage, is engaging or has engaged in criminal or
fraudulent conduct related to the proceeding.
Duration of Obligation
[13] A practical time limit on the obligation to rectify false evidence or false statements of law and
fact has to be established. The conclusion of the proceeding is a reasonably definite point for the
termination of the obligation. A proceeding has concluded within the meaning of this rule when a final
judgment in the proceeding has been affirmed on appeal or the time for review has passed.

http://lprb.mncourts.gov/rules/Documents/MN%20Rules%20of%20Professional%20Conduct.pdf

THESE OFFICIALS ARE ACTUALLY USING LOOPHOLES TO GET AROUND THE LAW TO HURT THIS FAMILY OR NOT COMPLYING WITH THE LAW IN THE HOPES NO ONE KNOWS WHAT TO DO AND THEY GET AWAY WITH IT

THEY ARE TELLING TAX PAYERS TO GET LAWYERS AND FIGHT THEM IF THEY DO NOT LIKE THE LAW BEING DISTRIBUTED TO A CERTAIN SOCIOECONOMIC GROUP OF PEOPLE UNFAIRLY

SCHOOL IS NOT CHARGED FOR DAILY CRIMINAL ENDANGERMENT BUT BASED ON THE MESSAGE THE SCHOOL SENDS FOR WHAT IS AGE APPROPRIATE THE PARENT GETS CHARGED  FOR WHAT THE SCHOOL DOES

A MAN  WHO TEACHES GUN SAFETY ACCIDENTALLY SHOOTS HIS CHILD IN THE HEAD AND SHOWS REMORSE SO HE IS FINE

HE HAS A LOADED FIRE ARM IN THE SAME RESIDENCE AS HIS WIFE'S DAYCARE AND ONE WOULD THINK WOULD ALSO BE CRIMINALLY ENDANGERING CHILDREN BUT HE HAS NO PROBLEM WITH CPS OR COUNTY ATTORNEYS

THEY HAVE TAX PAYERS PAYING FOR CHILDREN TO BE IN FOSTER CARE THAT NO LAW EXISTS FOR THE TO BE THERE

ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY MEGAN GAUDETTE ACTUALLY HELPED SCHROER VIOLATE A VULNERABLE PERSON  TO SELL THE OTHERS CHILDREN HER JOB IS TO APPLY THE LAW FAIRLY




TRI CITY UNITED ACCORDING TO VICTOR ATHERTON HAS A FREE PASS TO DO THIS AND IF A PARENT DOES NOT UNDERSTAND THAT THE LAW IS NOT EQUALLY DISTRIBUTED IN LE CENTER THEY ARE CRIMINALLY CHARGED

THAT BEING SAID SALLY SCHROER BROKE STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS TO SELL THIS YOUNG MOMS CHILDREN WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE COUNTY IRONICALLY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY HAS CHILDLESS FAMILY MEMBERS WHO WERE SHOPPING TO ELICIT THE SERVICES OF CHILDREN FOR FORCED ROLE PLAYING GAMES

THE COUNTY OFFICIALS ARE PAID TO PROTECT PEOPLE IN THEIR COMMUNITY YET HERE THEY ARE BREAKING IN TO HOMES ABDUCTING CHILDREN IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW TO SERVICE THEIR FAMILY MEMBERS WHO HAVE AN INABILITY TO BREED.

THEY THEN CONTINUE TO DISCRIMINATE VIOLATE AND COMITT CRIMES WITH A CORRUPT JUDGE WHO ALSO SEES NOTHING WRONG WITH RAPING POOR PEOPLE OF THEIR CHILDREN AND HAVING THE TAX PAYERS

  ARE EMPLOYED TO SERE JUSTICE ARE LOOKING FOR LEGAL LOOP HOLE LIKE NOT TELLING THE FAMILY THAT BACK GROUND CHECKS HAVE TO BE DONE BY A CERTAIN TIME NOT RESPONDING TO EMAILS REQUESTING  TO HAE BAK GROUND HEKS DONE SOEWHERE ELSE BEAUSE THEY ARE BREAKING LAWS AND ATTAKING PEOPLE WHO HAE BEEN TORTURED BY DENYING THE DUE PROESS AND RIINAL HARRASSENT ET

TO BUST UP THE FAILY