Thursday, January 2, 2014

MORE AND MORE AND EVEN MORE STUPID SHIT SALLY SCHROER DOES

OLDEST CHILD SEEMS TO HAVE TROUBLE TRUSTING STRANGERS. ??

According to the case plans SALLY SCHROER Is completely baffled as to why these kids don't trust strangers?

Despite the fact that a stranger just just broke into an apartment which is a crime. Never fear she won't be criminally  charged because she is one of those people Jason Moran gavee a special pass for.  only SALLY is not guilty of a crime. So all you folks in Le Center don't go breaking in to homes because you hear a baby cry. You will be criminally charged and your children sold for assuring Sally Schroer would never commit a crime when really she breaks the law beats the shit out of children breaks and enters terrorizes the poor with threats with.....Wait for it....a Special friggen pass!
 You will get charged if you do it but they give the poor people  brochures...to educate you about it never being okay to ake up a story about a baby crying to break in to a private residence



 JUST BROKE IN TO A HOME YELLING AT  a 6 year-old's mother for doing what she had to do because she could not afford a phone.  I am sure you know that what you did caused healthy well adjusted kids to have mental break downs and it was you that caused them to fear strangers.



Schroer why would you think breaking in and leaving again to cover your ass with the cop was a good idea if you had probable cause you should have stayed with the kids.


Shroer told the mother WHEN SHE  BREAKS IN THE HOUSE AND  HAD FOUND her ON THE  SHITTER  she WOULD STILL BE TAKING her KIDS. I AM TAKING THEM THIS TIME BECAUSE YOU ARE POOR.

THE CHILDREN ARE THEN PLACED WITH UNSTABLE PEOPLE WHO HAVE MENTAL ISSUES AS A RESULT OF NEVER HAVING CHILDREN. They FORCE TRAUMATIZED CHILDREN TO PRETEND THEY ARE THE PARENTS AND THAT THEY DON'T HAVE A MOM they allow people who tell the children they are being sold because their mommy is a crack head. .... UM YEA AGAIN SCHROER THERE IS A REASON YOUR  HAND BOOK TELLS YOU NOT TO DO WHAT YOU DID AND WHY IT IS ILLEGAL. GO FIGURE THE KID SEEMS TO NOT TRUST STRANGE CARE GIVERS THIS could be part of the problem right. I know I myself am stunned since the couple have a car??????????

READING YOUR PAPERWORK HURTS MY HEAD YOU ARE  DANGEROUSLY uneducated IN YOUR JOB FIELD

NICE ONE THOUGH TERRORIZING KIDS THREATENING THE PARENT ABOUT USING A TOILET I BET THAT DID NOT GIVE babies  NIGHT MARES well you did document night terrors and mental breakdowns as a result.


ANOTHER FAVORITE !!!!
AFTER I SALLY SCHROER BROKE IN TO A PRIVATE RESIDENCE CONDUCTING A WARANTLESS SEARCH AND UNABLE TO PROVIDE ANY EVIDENCE THAT I HAD REASON TO BELIEVE THERE WAS AN EMERGENCY THAT WOULD ALLOW ME TO LEGALLY ENTER THE HOME, I FOUND THREE CHILDREN UNATTENDED FOR 15 MINUTES Due TO POVERTY RELATED REASONS. IN NO IMMINENT DANGER. SO I FOLLOWED MN STATE LAWS AND MN HS MANUAL WHICH TELLS ME TO

(A)  OFFER SERVICES TO SUPPORT THE FAMILY TO PREVENT REMOVAL or

(B)  I CHOSE TO TELL THE SINGLE MOTHER IF i HAD BROKEN IN AND FOUND YOU ON THE TOILET I WOULD STILL BE TAKING YOUR KIDS =D

THEN I HAD THE OFFICER REMOVE THEM AND I RELOCATED THEM TO PEOPLE WHO HAVE MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES BUT THEY HAVE A CAR SO THEY DON'T ARRIVE AT COURT HOUSE ON FOOT LIKE CB...THE KIDS AGES 1, 4 AND 6 HAD MENTAL BREAKDOWNS BUT THE STRANGERS HAVE A CAR.

IN THE CARE OF THE STRANGERS THE OLDEST TRIES TO TAKE CARE OF HIS SIBLINGS. THE MENTALLY ILL COUPLE SEEM TO THINK THIS IS THE RESULT OF THE OLDEST BEING FORCED TO CARE FOR THE YOUNGER TWO, AS DOES THE CASE WORKER WHO CAUSED HIM TO HAVE A MENTAL BREAK DOWN......

THESE PEOPLE ARE TO DAMN ignorant TO BE SOCIAL WORKERS AND i AM SORRY BUT THE DOBMEIERS ARE JUST AS BAD.

YOU PEOPLE ARE SO DUMB YOUR DANGEROUS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE KIDS ARE IN A PLACE WITH NUT JOBS WHO HAVE MENTAL ISSUES BECAUSE THEY NEVER HAD KIDS , yes sally they have a car ..tHEY THE CHILDREN  DO NOT KNOW THEM AND THEY ARE TERRORIZED BECAUSE SOME PSYCHOTIC social worker BROKE IN TO THEIR HOME AND TOLD tHEiR MOTHER IF SHE BROKE IN TO THEIR HOME AND FOUND HER ON THE SHITTER IT WAS A CRIME. IN FRONT OF HER KIDS THEN  TOOK THEM FROM THEIR MOTHER FOR NOT HAVING MONEY FOR A PHONE . YOU STUPID DANGEROUS lady DO YOU KNOW WHAT YOU TOLD THEM. ITS A CRIME TO SIT ON THE TOILET OR USE THE TOILET IF YOU ARE A PARENT AND IT IS A CRIME TO BE POOR. TREATING HER LIKE A CRIMINAL MAKING HER HELPLESS FROM SAVING THEM FROM THE ONLY PERSON BREAKING THE LAW.

LET ME HELP YOU lady

HIS MOTHER WHO TAKES CARE OF HIM IS GONE AND HE CLINGS TO HIS SIBLINGS, ITS COMMON FOR CHILDREN  IN FOSTER CARE that do not need foster care to do that They hae just been repeatedly abused by a social worker all they have is eah other before the mental ases you plaed them with fore the to partake in role playing games so they can get off.


SOMEONE FORGOT TO READ  HANDBOOK AY!!!!!!!!!
SOMEONE HAS NOT HAD TO BE LAW ABIDING!!!!!!!!!!!
THE  LAWS SAID DON'T DO WHAT YOU JUST  DID TO THOSE KIDS FOR A REASON

IF YOUR TO STUPID TO NOT GET WHY A BEHAVIOR IS PRESENT
AND YOUR TO STUPID TO NOT KNOW WHAT POVERTY IS

YOU ARE A THREAT TO GODDAMN CHILDREN AND ADULTS IN YOUR JOB FIELD



   WTF THERE IS A REASON THERE ARE LAWS AND REGULATIONS THAT SAY WHAT YOU DID WAS COMPLETELY FUCKED UP AND A CRIME

STOP



TO REMOVE CHILDREN FROM THEIR MOTHER WHICH CAUSED THE CHILDREN TO HAVE MENTAL BREAK DOWNS I KNOW WEIRD RIGHT I PLACED THEM WITH PEOPLE WHO OWN A CAR SO I SALLY SCHROER DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE CHILDRENS MENTAL BREAK DOWNS


 FOR A POVERTY RELATED REASON WITH NO IMMINENT DANGER I ABUSED THE CHILDREN BY REMOVING THEM FROM THEIR MOTHER. THE OLDEST CHILD WANTS TO TAKE CARE OF HIS SIBLINGS



SEPT 21 2012
CHILDREN ARE REMOVED FROM CLEAN BABY PROOF HOME, THERE ARE NO SAFETY HAZARDS, THE HOME IS ALSO  STOCKED WITH HEALTHY FOOD AND PLENTY OF CLEAN CLOTHING

CONDITION OF CHILDREN ACCORDING TO SCHROER'S REPORT - THEY ARE ALL CLEAN THEY DON'T LOOK SICK  AND THEY ARE NOT FRIGHTENED.
HAPPY HEALTHY WELL ADJUSTED

BEING DEPRIVED OF NEEDS (SALLY SCHROER)
CLEAN BABY PROOF HOME, THERE ARE NO SAFETY HAZARDS, THE HOME IS ALSO  STOCKED WITH HEALTHY FOOD AND PLENTY OF CLEAN CLOTHING
CONDITION OF CHILDREN ACCORDING TO SCHROER'S REPORT - THEY ARE ALL CLEAN THEY DON'T LOOK SICK  AND THEY ARE NOT FRIGHTENED.
HAPPY HEALTHY WELL ADJUSTED
TESTIMONY: PSYCHOLOGIST
MOTHER IS LOVING AND NURTURING AND WOULD NEVER DO ANYTHING TO HURT HER CHILDREN ON PURPOSE
PARENT ASSESSMENT ZERO RISK TO ABUSE
--------------------------------------------------------------
IS SHE TALKING ABOUT THE 15 MINUTES IN A BABY PROOF ROOM BECAUSE OM CANNOT AFFORD A PHONE?

UNATTENDED NEAR  HEAVY TRAFFIC IN A TUB OF WATER OR AROUND MAJOR SAFETY HAZARDS IS IMMINENT, BABY PROOF AND LEAN ZERO SAFETY HAZARDS DOES NOT SEEM TO MEET IMMINENT DANGER  DANGER,, AND MINNESOTA STATES POVERTY RELATED NOT MALTREATMENT....

OR DID SHE SAY BABY PROOF CLEAN AND FOR MINUTES WITH PEOPLE UPSTAIRS

EXPERIENCED ABUSE
HAPPY HEALTHY WELL ADJUSTED, THE CHILD MUST BE AMAZINGLY  RESILIENT AND SCHROER OFFERS NO EVIDENCE OR EXAMPLES OF ABUSE ??? IT JUST SAYS SHE WAS ABUSED.
_____________________________________________________
SHE DID EXPERIENCE MENTAL BREAK LASTING FOR DAYS AND SCREAMED IN TERROR AT THE END OF EVERY VISIT BECAUSE  SALLY SCHROER ILLEGALLY ENTERED THE HOME AND ALSO ENDANGERED THE CHILDREN WHEN SHE RETREATED OUTSIDE TO COVER HER ASS WITH THE OFFICER AFTER COMMITTING THE CRIME. THE CHILDREN WERE THEN REMOVED WITH NO IMMINENT DANGER ALSO ANOTHER  CRIME UNDER SCHROER'S BELT AND PLACING HER WITH AN UNSTABLE COUPLE WHO WANT HER TO PERFORM ROLE PLAYING GAMES SO THEY CAN GET OFF.




LEFT ALONE NO ADULT SUPERVISION ---REPEAT THIS STATEMMENT TWICE REPHRASING SENTENCE SO  IT TAKES UP MORE  SPACE

 BECAUSE I HAVE TO LEAVE OUT THAT IT WAS 15 MINUTES AND POVERTY RELATED AND THAT THERE WAS NO IMMINENT DANGER

WHERE AS I TO LEFT THE CHILDREN ALONE SO THE OFFICER WOULD NOT KNOW I HAD ALL READY BEEN IN THE APARTMENT, SO I COULD GET AWAY WITH THE CRIME I COMMITTED. IF I HAD ENTERED LEGALLY AND COULD PROVIDE PROBABLE CAUSE WITH OUT PATHOLOGICALLY LYING LIKE I DO AND I WERE TRAINED; I WOULD KNOW TO STAY WITH THE CHILDREN UNTIL THE ADULT ARRIVED OR SOMEONE WITH A WARRANT.

SO I SALLY SCHROER WILL OMIT THAT I AM MORE ABUSIVE AND NEGLIGENT IN MY PURSUIT TO ABUSE A TRAUMA SURVIVOR THEN THE MOTHER WHO DID NOT WANT TO GET THE NEIGHBORS KIDS SICK  AND NEEDED TO ALL THE SCHOOL. SALLY SCHROER NOT KNOWING WHAT WAS GOING ON, POTENTIALLY ENDANGERED THE CHILDREN BY LEAVING THEM ALONE WHEN SHE RETREATED OUTSIDE AFTER SHE BROKE IN TO THE HOME A TRAINED WORKER WOULD BE REQUIRED TO STAY WITH THE CHILDREN UNTIL THE PARENT ARRIVED IF IT EXCEEDED 25 MINUTES CALL AN OFFICER AND ASK HIM TO GET A WARRANT

 ONE PERSON SCHROER  ABANDONS TO LIE ABOUT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY AND THE OTHER EUGENIE HARRIS CANT AFFORD A PHONE AND HAS CONCERNS ABOUT GETTING NEIGHBORS KIDS SICK

LEAVE OUT 15 MINUTES IN BABY PROOF ROOM AND PEOPLE UPSTAIRS IN SAME HOUSE LEAVE OUT SAFELY SECURE AND SLEEPING UNTIL SCHROER BROKE  IN THE HOME
LEAVE OUT DID NOT MEET DEFINITION OF IMMINENT DANGER OR MALTREATMENT

SO I WRITE NO SUPER VISION TWO TIMES TO TAKE UP SPACE SO I DO NOT LOOK LIKE PSYCHOPATH




REASON THIS CHILD NEEDS PROTECTION-
INADEQUATE HOUSING, (HOMELESS) ???????????
WHO IS THE RENTER OF THE APARTMENT THAT SCHROER ILLEGALLY BROKE IN TO

PARENTAL EXPOSURE TO DRUGS   
SCHROER TESTIFIED SHE ILLEGALLY SEARCHED THE MOTHERS APARTMENT TOP TO BOTTOM. NO MENTION OF DRUGS??? HOW STRANGE THAT THE MOTHER EXPOSES CHILDREN TO DRUGS. ANY ADDICT WOULD HAVE DRUGS IN THEIR HOME YET SHE SEARCHES TOP TO BOTTOM AND NO MENTION OF DRUGS.. CASE WORKER BREAKS IN TO THE HOME A 3RD TIE AND STILL AGAIN SHE DOES NOT FIND DRUGS HOW STRANGE. NO MENTION THE MOTHER IS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF DRUGS EITHER ?????

O KAY THERE MUST BE EXPOSURE OH SHE WAS GONE TO GET DRUGS???
NO IT SAYS HERE SICK KIDS SHE WAS GONE 15 MINUTES TO USE NEIGHBORS PHONE TO CALL KIDS IN TO SCHOOL

OH?!?!?!?! EXPOSURE TO DRUGS THEN ??????????????? WTF

the exposure to drugs must be the same as saying child was abused, just something to say?