Saturday, January 11, 2014

BAXTER SCHROER GAUDETTE KRENIK REPORTS



__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SEPT 24 2012 FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT FILE NO.40-JV-12-121
EX PARTE ORDER

A Judge Shall Uphold and Promote the Independence, Integrity, and Impartiality of the Judiciary, and Shall Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety
Rule 1.1 - Compliance with the Law
JUDGE M MICHAEL BAXTER

ONE SIDED HEARING
CASE WORKER IS INSIDE PRIVATE RESIDENCE CONDUCTING INTERVIEWS OF CHILDREN ACTUALLY VIOLATING STATE AND FEDERAL LAW ... THE GOOD NEWS IS NO MATTER HOW HARD SHE TRIES THIS COUNTY WILL BE BLED DRY COURTESY SALLY  SCHROER IN THE FEDERAL COURT AND WE MUST ASSUME CHILDREN OF ALL AGES WILL BE WALKING TO SCHOOL MORE THAN 2 MILES ONCE THIS IS SEEN IN FEDERAL COURT



PLUS THE COUNTY WANTS TAX PAYERS TO FLIP THE THE BILL FOR THE RAPE OF THESE KIDS AND THEIR SALE TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEYS CHILDLESS PREDATOR RELATIVES

WHO ASKED THE COUNTY TO DESTROY THE MOTHER SO THEY COULD FORE HER HILDREN IN DISTURBING ROLE PLAYING GAMES

TONY AND MELISSA  DOBMEIER ARE CHILD PREDATORS IN EVERY SENSE OF THE WORD VIOLATING BABYS TO GET THEMSELVES OFF

 NOW SCHROER IS GUILTY OF CHILD ENDANGERMENT BECAUSE SHE ABANDON THE CHILDREN NOT KNOWING  MOM ONLY STEPPED OUT FOR A MATTER OF MINUTES, CHILD ENDANGERMENT IS NOW ADDED TO THE SALLY SCHROER'S LIST OF   CRIMES AGAINST POOR PEOPLE. SHE ENDANGERS THE CHILDREN BECAUSE SHE BROKE THE LAW AND HAS TO COME UP WITH A COVER STORY FOR THE CRIME SHE COMMITTED OFFICER AND THAT IS ORE IMPORTANT


   CALLS POLICE OFFICER WHO ARRIVES IN UNDER A MINUTE.

.SCHROER FABRICATES INFORMATION ABOUT HER FIRST ENTRANCE TO POLICE OFFICER WHO THEN ENTERS THE PRIVATE RESIDENCE. MORE INTERVIEWS ARE CONDUCTED WITH THE CHILDREN ON PRIVATE PROPERTY,WITH OUT A WARRANT EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCE OR CONSENT...

ACCORDING TO STATE AND FEDERAL LAW  ANYTHING RETRIEVED DURING AN ILLEGAL WARRANTLESS SEARCH MAY NOT BE USED IN A COURT OF LAW AS A RESULT OF A CRIMINAL ACT. THERE IS A REASON THIS IS A STATE AND FEDERAL LAW.

THE POLICE OFFICER ENTERS ON THE WORD OF THE CASE WORKER WHO JUST WALKED IN THE DOOR NEVER ANNOUNCING HERSELF. AN OFFICER MAY NOT VIOLATE SOMEONES RIGHTS BASED ON A CLAIM OF ANOTHER PERSON . THE OFFICER MUST BE ABLE TO PROVIDE EVIDENCE AND PROOF OF THAT EVIDENCE THAT LED HIM TO BELIEVE A CRIME WAS BEING COMMITTED...

THE OFFICER DOES NOT PROVIDE WHAT THE LAW REQUIRES THAT WOULD ALLOW HIM OR SALLY SCHROER TO ENTER THE RESIDENCE CONDUCT INTERVIEWS AND TESTIFY THAT THEY SEARCHED THE HOME TOP TO BOTTOM WALKING THROUGH EVERY ROOM

MOTHER WAS NEXT DOOR SHE WAS THERE BECAUSE SHE DOES NOT HAVE MONEY FOR A PHONE SHE HAS THREE SICK THAT COULD GET THE NEIGHBORS KIDS SICK IF SHE BRINGS THEM WITH HER TO USE THE PHONE.

SHE WAS GONE FOR A MATTER OF MINUTES IN CLEAN BABY PROOF APARTMENT NO SAFETY HAZARDS CHILDREN ARE NOT FRIGHTENED  FOR POVERTY RELATED REASON

CHILDREN CAN ONLY BE REMOVED WITH IMMINENT DANGER ACCORDING TO THE MINNESOTA MALTREATMENT GUIDE LINES THERE WAS NO IMMINENT DANGER AND NO INJURIES AND CHILDREN WERE FINE UNTIL CASE WORKER BROKE IN THE PRIVATE RESIDENCE. THE ONLY IMMINENT DANGER IS THE CRIMINAL ACT OF THE CASE WORKER

CHILDREN ARE REMOVED IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW IN A ONE SIDED HEARING
WHEN THERE IS NO IMMINENT DANGER AND THERE ARE NO INJURIES,NEGLECT IS POVERTY RELATED meaning it is MUST NOT  be DETERMINED TO BE maltreatment  

SUPPORT SERVICES MUST BE OFFERED BY COUNTIES WHEN NEGLECT IS POVERTY RELATED  AND  IMMINENT DANGER IS NOT PRESENT TO PREVENT REMOVAL COUNTY IS THAN REQUIRED TO PRESENT TO THE COURT HOW THOSE SERIES FAILED AND WHY THE CHILDREN ARE IN NEED OF PROTECTION

NO SERVICES OFFERED
CHILDREN IN NO IMMINENT DANGER POVERTY RELATED NEGLECT DETERMINED TO BE MALTREATMENT AND STATE LAWS AND BYLAWS SAY IT IS NOT

AS A RESULT OF COUNTY OFFICIALS NOT BEING EDUCATED IN THEIR JOB FIELD AND NOT ABLE TO CONDUCT THEMSELVES WITH IN THE PARAMETERS OF THE LAW A 1 YEAR OLD HAS A NERVOUS BREAKDOWN

 "WE ALL AGREE" 
THAT IT IS IN THE CHILD'S BEST INTEREST 

THAT'S RIGHT FOLKS THEY HAVE NO LEGAL GROUND AND THROUGH OUT THE CHIPS HEARINGS THAT PHRASE IS USED AND REPEATED THROUGH OUT
WHAT IS MISSING IS GROUNDS!!!!!!!!!! THEY HAVE NO LEGAL GROUNDS OR EVIDENCE! IT IS IN THE CHILD'S BEST INTEREST 


 THE PEOPLE GETTING PAID JUDGE M MICHAEL BAXTER AND COURT ROOM STAFF SOCIAL WORKERS AND COUNTY ATTORNEYS
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------OCTOBER 3, 2012 FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT FILE NUMBER 40-JV-12-121

LE SUEUR COUNTY MOTIONS TO ILLEGALLY KEEP CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE  WITH ALL THE ABOVE ILLEGAL CONDUCT THAT NULLIFIES EVERY ACTION THEY HAVE TAKEN UP TO THIS POINT

CHILDREN AGE 1, 4 AND 6 HAVE ALL EXPERIENCED MENTAL BREAK DOWNS  LASTING FROM DAYS TO WEEKS

PEOPLE MAKING MONEY OFF OF THE CHILD'S MENTAL BREAKDOWNS  JUDGE M MICHAEL BAXTER AND COURT ROOM STAFF SOCIAL WORKERS AND COUNTY ATTORNEYS, FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS AND A GAL WHO ALSO BRINGS IN AN ATTORNEY AFTER SHE COMMITTED A CRIME AGAINST THE CHILD AND ATTEMPTED A NEGOTIATION TO CONVINCE GENIE TO DONATE HER KIDS TO THE COUNTY ATTORNEYS CHILDLESS MENTALLY UNSTABLE FAMILY MEMBERS TRYING TO PURCHASE/FORCED ADOPTION CHILDREN FROM POOR PEOPLE
OCTOBER 3, 2012 FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT FILE NUMBER 40-JV-12-121















FEBRUARY 14 2013  FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COURT FILE NUMBER 40-JV-12-121

ACCORDING TO  3 DIFFERENT LAWYERS  in the advocate group BAXTER CANNOT COURT ORDER A CASE PLAN TO BE SIGNED. IT WAS AN OVER REACH OF AUTHORITY

ITEMS THE JUDGE COURT ORDERED FOR THE MOTHER TO COMPLETE HAD NO RELATIONSHIP TO THE FINDINGS THAT WOULD ALLOW THE JUDGE TO COURT  ORDER EX FULL ACCESS TO MEDICAL RECORDS  NEUROLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAM

THESE ARE LISTED AS A REASON TO TAKE AWAY HER CHILDREN DESPITE THE LAWS THAT PROTECT HER LISTED IN FINDING OF FACTS BAXTER STRIPPED THE OTHER OF HER CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AND SOLD HER CHILDREN

___________________________________________________________________

APRIL 10 2013

FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS HAVE AN UNHEALTHY OBSESSION WITH THE HARRIS  CHILDREN AND HAVE BEEN FORCING THEM TO PARTICIPATE IN ROLE PLAYING GAMES. THEY GROSSLY SHOW UP AT EVERY HEARING AND THE JUDGE HAS BEEN PROVIDING SPECIAL WAITING AREAS  FOR THEM..

 FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS PLACE AN ORDER WITH THE JUDGE TO KEEP  EUGENIE HARRIS'S  CHILDREN

APRIL HEARING FAMILY MEMBER SHOWS UP REQUESTING TO TAKE KIDS
SHE WAS UNABLE TO TAKE THE EARLIER DUE TO YOUNGER SIBLING GOING IN TO A COMA AND ONLY ADULT FAMILY IN MN TO CARE FOR HIM WAS MS BRACKEN

SCHROER COUNTY WORKER STATES BECAUSE FAMILY WAS UNABLE TO STEP UP IN THE BEGINNING THEY DON'T GET CHILDREN


OCT-DEC 2012
THE FIRST 3 MONTHS A BRACKEN HAD MET WITH THE COUNTY TO TAKE CHILDREN THE NEXT DAY  SHE WAS INFORMED HER SIBLING HAD BEEN AIRLIFTED TO THE CITIES HE WAS COMATOSE AND HIGH PROBABILITY HE WOULD NOT SURVIVE .SHE BEING THE ONLY ADULT FAMILY MEMBER IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPENT THREE MONTHS TAKING CARE OF HIS FINANCIAL ISSUES HOME ISSUES AND WANTED TO BE WITH HIM IF HE PASSED AWAY.

JAN-MARCH 2013 
MS BRACKEN EXPERIENCED AN INJURY THAT REQUIRED SURGERY WITH 8 WEEK RECOVERY SURGERY WAS SCHED FOR END OF JAN. RECOVERY FEB AND MARCH

 SCHROER SAID I HAVE NOT HEARD FROM YOU FOR 6 MONTHS
MS BRACKEN TRIES TO EXPLAIN HER BROTHER WENT IN TO A COMA

JUDGE YELLS I DONT CARE WHAT HAPPENED TO YOU
JUDGE THEN SAYS HE WONT SEND CHILDREN BECAUSE THEN HE WOULD HAVE TO GET THEM BA....... THEN HE SAYS NEVER MIND

JUDGE REFUSES TO ALLOW FAMILY TO SPEAK
JUDGE SAYS MS BRACKEN WHO HAS BEEN APART OF THE CHILDREN LIFE FOR MORE THAN A YEAR IS NOT ALLOWED TO HAVE CONTACT WITH CHILDREN
BRACKEN WANTS TO ASSIST WITH SUPERVISED VISITS
BAXTER SAID YOU DON'T HAVE A BACK GROUND SEARCH, COMPLETED  BRACKEN SAID SHE DOES SHE HAS HAD THE SAME ONE AS THE COUNTY EMPLOYEES HAVE HAD DONE BECAUSE SHE IS STUDYING FOR HUMAN SERVICE DEGREE .

BAXTER SAYS NO TO BRACKEN WHO WORKS IN HUMAN SERVICE WORK AND IS STUDYING FOR HER DEGREE IN HUMAN SERVICE. BAXTER STATES BACK GROUND CHECK IDENTICAL TO WHAT COUNTY WORKER HAS WILL NOT BE GOOD ENOUGH SO NO AND THAT SHE IS NOT TO HAVE ANY CONTACT WITH THE CHILDREN SHE HAS HAD IN HER LIFE FOR A YEAR PLUS.

NO SAFETY RISKS EXIST AT THIS POINT BAXTER WILL ONLY ALLOW THE FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS EXTENDED FAMILY TO HAVE CONTACT WITH EUGENIE HARRIS CHILDREN. ALL SAFE AND POSITIVE INFLUENTIAL FAMILY MEMBERS ARE BANNED WITH NO EXPLANATION OTHER THAN HE WOULD HAVE TO GET THEM BAC......

MAY 2013
FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS AGAIN ALWAYS ENTER THE COURT ROOM FROM THE CONFERENCE ROOMS THEY ARE PROVIDED COURTESY THE JUDGE. WHO REINFORCES ISOLATION OF CHILDREN PEOPLE WHO WERE IN THEIR LIFE ARE TO HAVE NO CONTACT WITH NO SAFETY ISSUE AND NOW PEOPLE RELATED TO THE CHILDREN ARE ALSO BANNED FROM TALKING TO THE CHILDREN ON THE PHONE. TONY DOBMEIER FOSTER CARE PROVIDER HAS EUGENIE HARRIS CHILD CALLING HIM DADDY.

JUDGE ALLOWS FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS TO PARTICIPATE IN OFF THE RECORD CONVERSATIONS WHILE THE MOTHER OF THE CHILDREN IS SITTING IN THE HALL AND INVITED IN AFTER HE AND THE FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS FINNISH UP OFF THE RECORD CONVERSATIONS.

IT BECOMES EVIDENT THE JUDGE HAS A PREFERRED OUTCOME BASED ON HIS SPECIAL WAITING AREAS FOR FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS AND  WILLINGNESS TO ALLOW SOCIAL WORKERS TO YELL DEGRADING COMMENTS  AT THE MOTHER AND NOT ALLOWING OTHER PARTIES SUPPORTING THE MOTHER TO SPEAK.

GAUDETTE CAN DO ANYTHING SHE WANTS SHE TERMINATED SERVICES FOR REUNIFICATION DESPITE THE FACT THAT IT REQUIRES NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES AND THERE WAS ZERO NOTICE .



THE JUDGE HAS AN OBVIOUS RELATIONSHIP WITH GUADETTE HE CONTINUES TO SAY GAUDETTE WHAT DO YOU THINK WHAT DO YOU WANT GAUDETTE

CAN THE KIDS GO WITH MS BRACKEN GAUDETTE SAYS NO
SHE ALSO IS  NOT REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A REASON AGAIN WHAT WE KNOW IS THEIR IS NO SAFETY REASON AND MINNESOTA LAW IS CLEAR THAT ALL FAMILY MEMBERS SHOULD BE INVOLVED. YET IN THIS MAY MEETING BAXTER WONT EVEN LET BRACKEN SPEAK TO THE CHILDREN ON THE PHONE.

 ROSE VALDEZ GAL COMMITS FELONY CRIME AGAINST MOTHER AND KIDS

FOSTER CARE PROVIDERS TOLD KIDS THAT NIGHT THEY WERE GOING TO MAKE THEIR MOMMY GO AWAY.

BAXTER DENIES SOMEONE WITH PERSONAL INFORMATION STILL FIGHTING TO GET HER GRANDKIDS AND WHO ACTUALLY DID SALLY SCHROERS JOB IS NOT ALLOWED TO TESTIFY

CASE WORKER KNOWS BEFORE JUDGE RULES THAT HE TERMINATED HER RIGHTS SHE CASE WORKER CUT THE RIDE TO THE MOTHERS LAST VISIT WHICH WAS BEFORE THE RULING

THE FINDING OF FACTS WERE WRITTEN BY SOMEONE WHO DID NOT ATTEND HEARINGS PERJURED INFORMATION TO RULE OUT THE GRANDMOTHER  ALSO 48 OF THE FINDING OF FACTS WERE PERJURRED IT APPEARS AS THOUGH THE JUDGE DID NOT PERFORM HIS JUDICIAL DUTIES AND ALLOWED THE CASE WORKER WHO WAS NOT AT THE HEARING COMMITT A CRIME AGAINST THE MOTHER AND HER CHILDREN

BAXTER REFUSED TO RULE ON AN EXTENSION THE MOTHER QUALIFIED FOR AND WAS PRESENTED EVIDENCE THE IT WAS NOT HUMANLY POSSIBLE TO COMPLETE THE CASE PLAN THEY WROTE IN 6 MONTHS

BAXTER DENIES EXTENSION HE REFUSED TO RULE ON FROM FEB TO SEP THAT MOTHER QUALIFIED FOR AND HEARD EVIDENCE IT WAS NOT HUMANLY POSSIBLE TO COMPLETE IN 6 MONTHS

BAXTER ALSO PUSHES FOR FORCED ADOPTION TO COUPLE HE HAD SPECIAL WAITING AREAS FOR

ANYTIME THE MOTHER WANTED A HOLIDAY OR BIRTHDAY TIME WITH HER CHILDREN BAXTER  ALWAYS MADE SURE TO ASK SO THAT IT WOULD NOT IMPOSE ON THE DOBMEIER'S FAMILY TIME WITH EUGENIE HARRIS'S  CHILDREN?

CASE WORKERS FI;LE IS ORDERED TO DEFENSE

JUNE AND JULY TPR GAUDETTE STEPS DOWN BECAUSE COUNTY ATTORNEY IS PROVIDING WEEKEND CARE FOR EUGENIE HARRIS CHILDREN COUNTY ATTORNEY IS RELATED TO TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER WHO WERE PROVIDED SPECIAL SEATING IN WAITING AREAS AND ALLOWED TO SIT IN ON OFF THE RECORD CONVERSATIONS ONLY THEIR EXTENDED FAMILY IS ALLOWED TO BE INVOLVED DESPITE OBVIOUS PROOF THAT BRACKEN MADE MORE PROGRESS THAN THE CASE WORKER DID IN 2 MONTHS PROVIDING SUPPORT AND ORGANIZATION TO COMPLETE THE CASE PLAN

COURT TRANSCRIPTS ALTERED
















 OF A SIBLING AND COULD NOT

APRIL HEARING JUDGE REFUSES TO RULE ON 6 MONTH EXTENSION WHICH REQUIRES 3 THINGS
THE PARENT IS STILL WORKING ON
THE PARENT HAS NOT ABANDON CHILDREN


MAY
INCLUDING THE FOSTER ARE PROVIDERS IN ON OFF THE RECORD CONVERSATIONS THAT HE DOES NOT ALLOW THE  MOTHER TO BE INVOLVED WITH