Thursday, October 31, 2013

meeting with lawyer to sue Le Sueur County Tomorrow

Civil Action for Deprovision of Civil Rights 
Sept 21 2012
Sally Schroer claims to hear hears a baby cry while standing outside the home of Eugenie Harris. Sally Schroer opens the door and enters the private residence of Eugenie Harris and conducts an interview with the four year old child of Eugenie Harris.

Sally Schroer concluded based on an interview with the four year old child that mother was not home.

Sally Schroer claims she steps outside and called a police officer to conduct a welfare check. Officer Tracey Hanna arrives in under one minute at the home of Eugenie Harris. He opens the door and both the police officer enter the private residence of Eugenie Harris. A second interview is conducted with the children.

Sally Schroer is opening dresser drawers and going through bags and starts packing to remove the children from the child proof room they were left alone in for only a matter of minutes with adults just up the stairs.

Mother is calling in children to School because children are sick. She does not have money for a phone and did not want to expose children to neighbors young children.  Mom runs 18 ft next door to call school because Sally Schroer told her she would take her kids away if she does not call children in to school the day before .

Sally Schroer claims children are not afraid and poverty and being a single parent was the determining cause of mothers 15 minute absence. The time frame is a guess mainly because witnesses claim sally Schroer accused mother of being absent for up to 45 minutes on the scene she changes it to 23. Mother argues with officer outside for a period of time before she gets back in the residence.



CALABRETTA v. FLOYD No. 97-15385.


Argued and Submitted June 8, 1998 -- August 26, 1999

The facts in this case are noteworthy for the absence of emergency.
The social worker  told him that they had received a report of the children crying.The police officer had the opinion that in any check on the welfare of children “there is an exigent circumstance” so no search warrant is needed.   
The Calabrettas sued the social worker and policeman and other defendants for damages, declaratory relief and an injunction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.   The defendants moved for summary judgment on grounds of qualified immunity.   The district court denied the defendants' motion, and the social worker and police officer appeal.A. The coerced entry
The social worker and police officer concede that for purposes of appeal, they should be treated as having entered the Calabretta home without consent.   They argue that the district court erred in holding that their nonconsensual entry required special exigency or a search warrant.   Their theory is that an administrative search to protect the welfare of children does not carry these requirements, and the social worker was doing just what she was supposed to do under state administrative regulations.   They claim immunity for entry into the home, interviewing the twelve year old, and strip searching the three year old.
 Minnesota Child Maltreatment 
Screening Guidelines


Neglect Defined [M.S. 626.556, subd. 2 (f) (1)-(9)]
Neglect means “the failure by a person responsible for a child's care to supply a child with
necessary food, clothing, shelter, health, medical, or other care required for the child’s
physical or mental health when reasonably able to do so.” [M.S. 626.556, subd. 2 (f) (1)]

At times, conditions of poverty create circumstances in which a child may be neglected due 
to the parent(s)’ lack of financial resources. Under these circumstances, counties work to 
assist parent(s) in correcting the conditions of neglect, and to meet the protective needs of 
their children, but do not determine the parents’ behavior as neglectful. 
The following conditions should be considered when screening alleged reports of neglect:
the concern poses a significant health or safety hazard, or there is a continuing pattern of
neglect that poses a significant health or safety hazard; the age and vulnerability of a child.

 http://nrccps.org/wp-content/uploads/Minnesota-Child-Maltreatment-Screening-Guideline.pdf

Categories of Neglect

I. Failure to Provide Necessary Supervision or Child Care Arrangements [M.S. 626.556,
subd. 2 (f) (3)]

Failure to provide for necessary supervision or child care arrangements occurs when a
child is unable to provide for their own basic needs or safety, or the basic needs or
safety of another child in their care. [M.S. 626.556, subd. 2 (3)]

1. Modifying factors affecting screening decisions include:

 A child’s age, mental ability and maturity level.
 The accessibility of the parent/guardian/or designated caretaker to a child
by phone and/or in person.
 The presence of intellectual deficits, psychological problems, or mental health
concerns; the existence of physical problems or disabilities.
 The behavioral history of a child, including suicidal thoughts or actions, fire
setting, delinquency, vandalism or assault.
 A child’s age, if using the kitchen stove, an iron or other appliance.
 The establishment of a well understood escape plan that has been worked out
by the parent(s), or fire drill practice that has been rehearsed with a child. The
presence of a working fire/smoke detector in the home.
 The presence of unusual hazards in the home. 17

 A child feeling confident and safe when left alone. Schroer asks child are you scared child responds no

2. Examples of parent(s) not providing adequately for a child’s supervision and safety
includes, but is not limited to:

 Failing to provide supervision of children in bathtubs, near swimming
pools, lakes, ponds, holding tanks, machinery, busy streets and alleys
 Selecting an unreliable person to provide child care.

G. Failure to Protect a Child from Conditions or Actions that Present Serious
Endangerment [M.S. 626.556, subd. 2 (f) (2)]
“Failure to protect means the failure to protect a child from conditions or actions that
seriously endanger the child’s physical or mental health when reasonably able to do so,
including a growth delay, which may be referred to as failure to thrive that has been
diagnosed by a physician and is due to parental neglect.” [M.S. 626.556, subd. 2 (f) (2)]
Examples of parental failure to protect would include, but not limited to:

1. A child is present and/or participates with the parent(s), guardian(s), or caretaker(s)
in committing a criminal act that seriously endangers a child’s physical or mental
health. Serious endangerment in these situations includes, but is not limited to, the
use of guns, knives, or other weapons, and also threats of violence, or actions
resulting in harm to the victim.

2. The parent(s), guardian(s), or person(s) responsible for a child’s care do not protect
them from a person who poses a serious threat to a child’s safety and the parent(s) or
caretaker(s) do not act to protect a child.

3. Reports of ongoing abuse between siblings that result in physical injury and the
parent(s) or caretaker(s) do not act to protect a child.

4. Parent(s), guardian(s), or other person(s) knowingly allows a person who has
sexually abused a child to reside in the family home or have unsupervised contact
with the child. (This constitutes threatened sexual abuse, and should be screened in
as child sexual abuse, as stated on pg. 8.) 16


5. Parent(s), guardian(s), or other persons responsible for a child’s care are arrested
for driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs with children in the vehicle.

6. Drug raids where a child is present and where illegal drugs are found


discrimination of disability in services have been prepared

proof of lawyer and head of human services  isolating mother with disability to exploit

perjury

proof that county attorneys placed children in foster care under rules that do not apply

proof that Minnesota  screens out poverty and maltreatment shall not be found

proof that reasonable efforts were not made

conflict of interest intentionally hidden by judge and county attorneys and head of human services susan rynda

in civil court all evidence can be used, Sally Schroer documenting to not send children twice while writing in tpr that mother was a no show where children could join her- implying she had the opportunity and passed

refused to send children to new york mills recommendations for follow up treatment

the order placed by the Dobmeier's to permanently keep  children

replacing parent with Dobmeiers in parent child therapy

refusing to reunite children in safe place with parent

special treatment they received

judge stating in court kids cannot go with anita because he will have to get them back

judge isolating family in violation of case plan to keep included

no safety risk involved to isolate

judge and schroer beating up on mother for allowing children to talk to bio relatives

cari krenik refusing to work with mother recorded and documented cari refused to here best interest proposal for children

cari wrote letter saying no evidence but terminatew only

cari called family 1 month before termination saying judge terminated

cari responded to family with safety concerns about mother to get a lawyer if you do not like it

rose valdez perjury- intent to harm

irene christenson perjury -intent to harm










ANYTIME SOCIAL SERVICES FAILS TO REUNITE FAMILY IN SAFE CONDITIONS FOR EXAMPLE NEW YORK MILLS AND WELCOME MANOR REASONABLE EFFORT IS NOT MET. ANYTIME SERVICES ARE NOT OFFERED BEFORE REMOVAL REASONABLE EFFORT WAS NOT MET.

RECORD SHOWS BRIEF CONVERSATION AND MINNESOTA SAYS WHEN POVERTY PLAYS A ROLE NO MALTREATMENT SHALL BE FOUND AND SERVICES MUST BE OFFERED



Minnesota
What Are Reasonable Efforts?
Citation: Ann. Stat. § 260.012
Reasonable efforts are made upon the exercise of due diligence by the responsible social services agency to use
culturally appropriate and available services to meet the needs of the child and the child’s family. Services may include
those provided by the responsible social services agency and other culturally appropriate services available in the
community.
When determining whether reasonable efforts have been made, the court shall consider whether services to the child
and family were:
• Relevant to the safety and protection of the child
• Adequate to meet the needs of the child and family
• Culturally appropriate
• Available and accessible
• Consistent and timely
• Realistic under the circumstances
In the case of an Indian child, the responsible social services agency must provide active efforts, as required by the Indian
Child Welfare Act of 1978.
When Reasonable Efforts Are Required
Citation: Ann. Stat. § 260.012
The social services agency has the burden of demonstrating that:
• It has made reasonable efforts to prevent placement of the child in foster care.
• It has made reasonable efforts to eliminate the need for removal of the child from the child’s home and to reunify
the child with the child’s family at the earliest possible time.
• It has made reasonable efforts to finalize an alternative permanent home for the child, and it has considered
permanent alternative homes for the child inside or outside of the State.
• Reasonable efforts to prevent placement and to reunify the child with the parent or guardian are not required.
Wow the lawyers involved are actually guilty of misconduct.
Brent uses Megan as an agent to go in and work with the judge
Megan Gaudette tried to block Anita Bracken so the social workers could isolate and exploit her disability

RULE 8.4: MISCONDUCT
It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly
assist or induce another to do so, or do so through the acts of another;
(b) commit a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty,
trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects;
(c) engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation;
(d) engage in conduct that is prejudicial to the administration of justice;
(e) state or imply an ability to influence improperly a government agency or
official or to achieve results by means that violate the Rules of Professional Conduct or
other law;
(f) knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of
applicable rules of judicial conduct or other law;
(g) harass a person on the basis of sex, race, age, creed, religion, color, national
origin, disability, sexual orientation, or marital status in connection with a lawyer’s
professional activities;
(h) commit a discriminatory act prohibited by federal, state, or local statute or
ordinance that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s fitness as a lawyer. Whether a
discriminatory act reflects adversely on a lawyer’s fitness as a lawyer shall be
determined after consideration of all the circumstances, including:
(1) the seriousness of the act,
(2) whether the lawyer knew that the act was prohibited by statute or
ordinance,
(3) whether the act was part of a pattern of prohibited conduct, and
(4) whether the act was committed in connection with the lawyer’s
professional activities; or 114
(i) refuse to honor a final and binding fee arbitration award after agreeing to
arbitrate a fee dispute.
Comment
[1] Lawyers are subject to discipline when they violate or attempt to violate the Rules of
Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so or do so through the acts of another, as
when they request or instruct an agent to do so on the lawyer’s behalf. Paragraph (a), however, does not
prohibit a lawyer from advising a client concerning action the client is legally entitled to take.
[2] Many kinds of illegal conduct reflect adversely on fitness to practice law, such as offenses
involving fraud and the offense of willful failure to file an income tax return. Although a lawyer is
personally answerable to the entire criminal law, a lawyer should be professionally answerable only for
offenses that indicate lack of those characteristics relevant to the practice of law. Offenses involving
violence, dishonesty, or breach of trust, or serious interference with the administration of justice are in
that category. A pattern of repeated offenses, even ones of minor significance when considered
separately, can indicate indifference to legal obligation.
[3] Lawyers holding public office assume legal responsibilities going beyond those of other
citizens. A lawyer’s abuse of public office can suggest an inability to fulfill the professional role of
attorney. The same is true of abuse of positions of private trust such as trustee, executor, administrator,
guardian, agent and officer, director or manager of a corporation or other organization.
[4] Paragraph (g) specifies a particularly egregious type of discriminatory act-harassment on the
basis of sex, race, age, creed, religion, color, national origin, disability, sexual orientation, or marital
status. What constitutes harassment in this context may be determined with reference to
antidiscrimination legislation and case law thereunder. This harassment ordinarily involves the active
burdening of another, rather than mere passive failure to act properly.
[5] Harassment on the basis of sex, race, age, creed, religion, color, national origin, disability,
sexual orientation, or marital status may violate either paragraph (g) or paragraph (h). The harassment
violates paragraph (g) if the lawyer committed it in connection with the lawyer’s professional activities.
Harassment, even if not committed in connection with the lawyer’s professional activities, violates
paragraph (h) if the harassment (1) is prohibited by antidiscrimination legislation and (2) reflects
adversely on the lawyer’s fitness as a lawyer, determined as specified in paragraph (h).
[6] Paragraph (h) reflects the premise that the concept of human equality lies at the very heart of
our legal system. A lawyer whose behavior demonstrates hostility toward or indifference to the policy of
equal justice under the law may thereby manifest a lack of character required of members of the legal
profession. Therefore, a lawyer’s discriminatory act prohibited by statute or ordinance may reflect
adversely on his or her fitness as a lawyer even if the unlawful discriminatory act was not committed in
connection with the lawyer’s professional activities.
[7] Whether an unlawful discriminatory act reflects adversely on fitness as a lawyer is
determined after consideration of all relevant circumstances, including the four factors listed in
paragraph (h). It is not required that the listed factors be considered equally, nor is the list intended to be
exclusive. For example, it would also be relevant that the lawyer reasonably believed that his or her
conduct was protected under the state or federal constitution or that the lawyer was acting in a capacity
for which the law provides an exemption from civil liability. See, e.g., Minn. Stat. Section 317A.257
(unpaid director or officer of nonprofit organization acting in good faith and not willfully or recklessly). 115
[8] A lawyer may refuse to comply with

Wednesday, October 30, 2013

CARI KRENIK BREAKING LAWS TO TRAFFIC CHILDREN

THE EVIDENCE IS CLEAR AND CONCISE THAT THIS CHILD WAS REMOVED FROM HER MOTHER BECAUSE SOCIAL WORKERS AND A JUDGE ALONG WITH COUNTY ATTORNEYS VIOLATED THE LAW ON SO MANY LEVELS . IF THEY WERE REQUIRED TO UPHOLD THE LAW THEY COULD NOT HAVE REMOVED HER FROM HER HOME.

SHE WAS NEVER ABUSED WHICH DID NOT MATTER BECAUSE AS LONG AS TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER WERE CHILDLESS THE COUNTY NEEDED CHILDREN TO FILL THE ORDER PLACED WITH THE JUDGE.

WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO TORTURE A CHILD

THAT IS SOMETHING ONLY SOMEONE LIKE CARI KRENIK CAN ANSWER...

SHE LIED 50 + TIMES TO TEAR APART CHILDREN FROM A NON ABUSIVE MOTHER SO SHE COULD TERRORIZE THEM HERSELF. SHE PLACED THEM WITH MENTALLY DURANGED PEOPLE WHO THE THE CHILD PSYCHOLOGIST SAID THEY WERE INCREASINGLY GETTING WORSE.

THE CHILDREN WERE REACTING TO THE LOSS OF THEIR MOTHER WHEN THE MENTALLY UNSTABLE DOBMEIER WENT TO WORK
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AS TO WHAT IT TAKES TO TORTURE A CHILD SHE WORKS FOR CHILD PROTECTION OF LE CENTER WHERE SHE COMMITS PERJURY FILLING ORDERS FOR MENTALLY UNSTABLE CHILDLESS COUPLES.
CARI CLAIMS IN AN INTERVIEW THAT SHE AGREES WITH BROKERING OUT THE POOR CHILDREN TO THE PEOPLE WITH A HIGHER INCOME BECAUSE POOR PEOPLE ARE SICK (TO BE RULED OUT)

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

Oldest child had to spend birthday with out mom due to Cari Krenik's perjury

This child spent his 1st birthday  ever without his mother. It is truly sad because had Tony and Melissa Dobmeier never placed an order with Sally Schroer to get rid of his mother; they would have shared that day together. Just like they have since the day he was born.  He would not even get to tell his mother goodbye. The last time they saw each other. Cari Krenik acting in her professional capacity did nothing to prepare the mother or children for the abrupt separation. All she did was cancel the driver knowing mom was in another town with out transportation to Le Center. Cari Krenik also made sure to not inform the mother who was in another town that she cancelled the ride.

The reason this child can no longer spend another birthday with his mother is more than likely because the county attorneys involved are related to the childless couple and good friends with the judge; who placed an order for the county to get rid of the mother.

There were actually no state or federal laws that applied to hold the children in foster care. The county Attorney looked for laws that had the word other in them and intentional or refused to, to put them in foster care. Minnesota describes both situations as unintentional and the circumstance of poverty.

The law states social workers need a warrant and imminent danger to remove. sally broke and entered and abducted children who were not in imminent danger. the law says sally needs to offer services and failed to do so.

the county made a list of trauma provoking actions to a mother who was tortured in captivity most her childhood. when symptoms begin to appear as a result of being terrorized and laws and rights violated Cari Krenik begin committing perjury and submitting false and misleading information to the court to sell her children. they grossly describe the breakdowns the children experience as a result of the separation psychologists also confirm over a period of a year they are still at ground zero emotionally as a result of Sally Schroer's initial assault on the family.  

This little boy did not get to spend his birthday with his mommy because of how Le Sueur County and government officials acting in a professional capacity terrorized three innocent babies and a single mother experiencing situations caused by poverty.

The county documents this mother's use of public assistance like it is a crime. Sally Schroer even documents what means of transportation they use to arrive at the court house indicating she has been stalking them. CB arrives at the court house on foot.

they write in their finding of facts she does not deserve to be a mother because she was homeless for a month. It is human services job to offer resources to correct that for the family. It is not their job to to take away their children.





Monday, October 28, 2013

GOOD NEWS TODAY WOOT WOOT


THIS MOM HAD SOME GOOD NEWS TONIGHT .. THE COUNTY THREW THOUSANDS OF TAX PAYER DOLLARS DOWN THE TOILET TORTURING THIS FAMILY.
(NO EVIDENCE)+(NO REASONABLE EFFORT) 

THE COUNTY ATTORNEY HAS ANOTHER ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GOING AFTER MOM FOR THE 15 MINUTES THE BOYS PLAYED IN THE PARK. THIS COURT HEARING IS NOVEMBER 12 TH 2013 AT 8:30M AM .

 THE COUNTY COULD BE HOLDING A CRIMINAL HEARING OVER MOTHER ALLOWING HER BOYS TO PLAY IN THE PARK FOR 15 MINUTES TO SERVE THE PURPOSE OF PROLONGING OR PREVENTING THE RETURN OF THE CHILDREN. I AM NOT SURE HOW MUCH TIME ONE PERSON SHOULD HAVE TO DO FOR SOMETHING LIKE THAT; WHICH DID NOT RESULT IN AN INJURY OR EVER HAPPEN AGAIN. I PERSONALLY FEEL THE LOSS OF HER CHILDREN FOR OVER A YEAR AS A RESULT OF THE COUNTY ATTORNEY USING RULES THAT DID NOT APPLY TO HOLD THE CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE TO BEGIN WITH.

  THEY STOLE HER CHILDREN FROM HER FOR OVER A YEAR ABUSING THEM IN FRONT OF HER RENDERING HER HELPLESS TO  STOP HER CHILDREN S PAIN.  THAT IS LIKE DEATH ROW FOR A PARENT.

I ALSO WONDER IF THEY CAN GET HER WITH A CRIMINAL CHARGE FOR THE PARK BECAUSE THE APPELLATE COURT RULED NO EVIDENCE AND NO REASONABLE EFFORT BY COUNTY.

MINNESOTA MALTREATMENT SCREENING FOUND ON MINNESOTA JUDICIAL WEBSITE DESCRIBES MALTREATMENT DOES NOT APPLY

 IT SHOULD BE INTERESTING  A COMPLAINT WAS IMMEDIATELY FILED WITH THE STATE BAR EXPLAINING THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST THAT WAS WITH HELD FOR NEARLY A YEAR BY THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND THE JUDGE.

WITH THE ADDED INFORMATION THAT THE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE HAS ONCE AGAIN TAKEN AN INTEREST IN THIS MOTHER AND HER CHILDREN.

THE COUNTY ATTORNEY BRENT CHRISTIAN IS RELATED TO THE COUPLE WHO ACTUALLY PLACED AN ORDER WITH THE COUNTY WORKER SALLY SCHROER AND THEN another order  with JUDGE  M MICHAEL BAXTER,  REQUESTING TO KEEP THE MOTHERS CHILDREN PERMANENTLY. (EVERY ONE WHO READ THE PLACED ORDER TO THE JUDGE TO KEEP MOTHERS CHILDREN PERMANENTLY FOUND THEIR CONDUCT TO SERIOUSLY DISTURBING.

 BRENT CHRISTIAN THE COUNTY ATTORNEY HAD BEEN PROVIDING WEEKEND CARE FOR THE THREE CHILDREN OF EUGENIE HARRIS IN HIS HOME. AT THE SAME TIME  HIS OFFICE WAS TERMINATING THE MOTHERS RIGHTS.

 BRENT HAD MEGAN GAUDETTE HIS NEWEST ASSISTANT PROSECUTING  THE MOTHERS CASE.  SHE IS THE FORMER EMPLOYEE AND CURRENT FRIEND OF THE PRESIDING JUDGE M MICHAEL BAXTER WHO ALSO PARTICIPATED IN TERMINATING MOTHERS PARENTAL RIGHTS.

IF THIS IS ANOTHER LEGAL TACTIC THAT WILL RESULT IN FURTHER HARM TO THE THREE CHILDREN;  HOPEFULLY THE STATE BOARD WILL INTERVENE.

 THE OFFICE HAS NO RIGHT BEING INVOLVED WITH ANY MATTER WHEN IT COMES TO THESE KIDS.

THE COUNTY IS ALSO CURRENTLY UNDER INVESTIGATION BY OCR FOR DISCRIMINATION AGAINST THE MOTHER. ANY  SIGN OF RETALIATION OR MISCONDUCT  TO PROLONG ABUSE OF THIS FAMILY  MAY BE UNPRODUCTIVE.

ADDING EXPENSIVE COURT HEARINGS FOR RETALIATION PURPOSES MAY NOT BE IN THE COUNTY'S BEST INTEREST. ESPECIALLY SINCE THE COUNTY HAS ALSO PLACED ITSELF IN A POSITION FOR A HUGE CIVIL SUIT FOR VIOLATING THE MOTHERS RIGHTS OVER AND OVER. TORTURING THESE THREE LITTLE CHILDREN AND A MOTHER A TRAUMA SURVIVOR.






IN 2001 SALLY SCHROER MADE A MOM FEEL THIS WAY 

WHY ARE TEENAGE CHILDREN ATTEMPTING TO COMMITT SUICIDE IN THE CARE OF LE SUEUR COUNTY CHILD PROTECTION ? 


THEY HAVE SOME REALLY MESSED UP PEOPLE THERE 

WHAT HAPPENED IS MOTHER RECEIVED SUPPORT FROM FAMILY BUT LOOK WHAT SCHROER DOES TO THIS VICTIM 

7. Social Worker Sally Schroer refused to allow me to
provide transportation for the children or to be the
supervisor, even though the visits were scheduled to
be conducted in my home. This seemed very strange to
me, since I had been appointed to have physical
custody of Marshall, and all of a sudden, the County
workers didn=t want me to really be involved at all. 
8. The person who was asked to provide transportation
for the children and supervise the visits, Cis
Christianson, whom I learned was Sally Schroer=s
former school teacher, had a very limited time
schedule to provide such assistance. Her limited
scheduled resulted in Sheila getting very little
visitation with her children.

THIS IS CONSISTANT WITH MOTHERS CASE AND SALLY SCHROER SPENDS COUNTY MONEY TO ALINATE CHILD AND PARENT FROM FAMILY 
16. The County refused to allow my father to supervise
visits, even though they approved him as a foster
parent for M.N and the Court had appointed him as
temporary physical custodian.

17. After innumerable problems in trying to deal with
Le Sueur County, I became even more depressed and
discouraged; I felt it was a Ano win@ situation - they
did not want me in my children=s lives, and there was
no point in fighting the system. 
18. I never received personal notice of the fact that
the County was trying to terminate my parental rights
even though I lived in Minnesota the entire time. I
have never lived in Ohio, and never told anyone I
intended to do so.



22. Due to the support I receive from my husband and
my mother-in-law, and the mental health treatment,
including my medications, I am delighted to say that I
have been able to regain healthy relationships with
both of my sons.

Sunday, October 27, 2013

CASE PLAN FOR CARI KRENIK AND SALLY SCHROER

FINDINGS
UNABLE TO BE LAW ABIDING 
MALTREATMENT OF CHILD-PRISON
ABDUCTION OF CHILD-PRISON
BREAKING AND ENTERING-PRISON
BREAKING AND ENTERING
BREAKING AND ENTERING
PERJURY PRISON
PERJURY
PERJURY
ABUSE OF A PERSON WITH DISABILITY-PRISON
MALTREATMENT OF CHILD - PRISON 





Saturday, October 26, 2013

IS POVERTY ASSOCIATED WITH CRIME?

I ONCE BELIEVED THAT POVERTY AND CRIME WENT HAND AND HAND UNTIL I READ THROUGH A STACK OF PAPERWORK DETAILING THE BREAKING AND ENTERING IN TO PRIVATE PROPERTY TO ABDUCT CHILDREN. ONLY TO FIND RESPECTABLE PEOPLE ABDUCTING CHILDREN IN VIOLATION ON THE LAW AND IN VIOLATION OF THE MOTHER AND HER FAMILY. I ALSO WATCHED VIDEOS LISTENED TO TAPE RECORDINGS. I HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE NOW TO
 BELIEVE LE SUEUR COUNTY COUNTY OFFICIALS AND EMPLOYEES POSE A THREAT TO THEIR COMMUNITY AND THE SANCTION OF THEIR FAMILIES.  THERE IS A CLASS STATUS WITH RULES IN THE SMALL COMMUNITY OF LE CENTER. FOR ME THIS IS VERY STRANGE BECAUSE I GREW UP IN A SMALL TOWN AND THERE WAS NEVER A CLASS STATUS THAT ALLOWED A MORE POWERFUL GROUP OF PEOPLE TO INTENTIONALLY HARM THE LOWER CLASS. THE TOWN I GREW UP IN, "WE THE PEOPLE WAS A REALITY" WE TOOK CARE OF EACH OTHER, THERE WAS RESPECT.

IN LE CENTER CORRUPT IGNORANT ASSHOLE WORK IN THE BASEMENT OF THE COURT HOUSE. THEY COMMIT CRIMES AGAINST THE VULNERABLE TO SUPPLY CHILDREN TO THE MENTALLY DISTURBED (FOR EXAMPLE TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER). THIS SADISTIC COUPLE ACTUALLY BELIEVES THEY ARE ENTITLED TO PARENT SOMEONE ELSE S CHILDREN. TO ACHIEVE THIS THEY SEND IN COUNTY OFFICIALS WHO COMMIT CRIMES AGAINST HER ACTUALLY RAPING THE MOTHER OF HER CHILDREN.


 BY RAPING A MOTHER OF HER CHILDREN SALLY SCHROER NEVER Saw EUGENIE HARRIS AS A PERSON. SHE ONLY NOTED WHAT SHE COULD TAKE FROM HER TO GIVE TO ANOTHER. HER RECORDED CONDUCT IN  THE COURT ROOM ALLOWS YOU TO SEE A TRUE PREDATOR. I CAN ONLY HEAR WHAT SHE DOES AND NOT SEE. HOWEVER MS BRACKEN NICELY DETAILS HER ANIMATED ACTIONS. ALONG WITH OTHER INDIVIDUALS.

FOR EXAMPLE MEGAN GAUDETTE AND JUDGE BAXTER'S ANIMATED BEHAVIOR. MEGAN GAUDETTE HAD TO STEP DOWN BECAUSE SHE HAD BEEN HIDING A HUGE CONFLICT OF INTEREST. SHE ACTUALLY SHOWS UP AT A TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS HEARING AND SITS IN THE CORNER TEXTING AND SHE AND JUDGE BAXTER ARE MAKING A SERIES OF EXCHANGES THROUGH EYE CONTACT.

I FOUND AN EMAIL SENT TO ONE OF THE LAWYERS FROM MS BRACKEN SAYING THAT THE JUDGE IS NOT CAPABLE OF A FAIR TRIAL HE WILL  INTENTIONALLY HARM THIS FAMILY AND NEEDS TO STEP DOWN. HE HAS SPECIAL WAITING AREAS FOR TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER HE ACCEPTED AN ORDER FROM THE DOBMEIER'S TO KEEP THE CHILDREN. WHO DISHONORS AND REDUCES A COURT ROOM TO SERVE THE  PURPOSE OF PLACING AND ACCEPTING ORDERS FROM CHILDLESS COUPLES ASKING FOR POOR PEOPLES CHILDREN.

IS HE A JUDGE OR A BLACK MARKET BABY BROKER.

FROM SEPTEMBER 21ST TO TODAY'S DATE THERE IS ZERO EVIDENCE RECORDED BY THE COUNTY OF LE CENTER THAT THIS MOTHER EVER ABUSED OR NEGLECTED HER CHILDREN. ALSO ACCORDING TO THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA ON  THE OTHER HAND I HAVE A MOUNTAIN OF EVIDENCE THAT SHOWS THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE PARTICIPATED IN A CRIME OF SOME FORM AGAINST EUGENIE HARRIS AND HER THREE BABIES.




I KNOW THE THE MIDDLE CHILD AND I HAVE TO SAY YOU SEE HOW DESPERATE HE IS TO BE WITH HIS MOM. HE WAS ONCE CHARISMATIC A DELIGHT TO BE AROUND, A LITTLE CHARMER.

IT BREAKS YOUR HEART TO KNOW SOMEONE LIKE CARI KRENIK WOULD LIE NOT JUST ONCE BUT 50 TIMES TO MAKE SURE HE NEVER SAW HIS MOMMY AGAIN.

THEN CANCELLED MOTHERS  RIDE AND LIED ABOUT THE VISIT SCHEDULE.  YOU JUST KNOW THIS WOMAN IS SUCH A SADISTIC BITCH SHE NEVER ONCE WENT TO A SHRINK AND SAID HOW CAN I DO THIS WITH AS LITTLE DAMAGE AS POSSIBLE. TO MOTHER AND CHILDREN WHAT IS BEST FOR BOTH.

CARI SEES MOM AS NOT HUMAN SO SHE SENT OUT A SEPT SCHEDULE MIS LEADING HER THEN CANCELLED THE RIDE SO NO LAST VISIT COULD TAKE PLACE AND THEN LIED TO EVERY ONE.


NOW I ASSOCIATE CRIME TO
A JUDGE
A POLICE OFFICER
COUNTY ATTORNEY
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
HEAD OF HUMAN SERVICES
SUPERVISOR OF CHILD PROTECTION
CHILD PROTECTION WORKER
CHILD PROTECTION WORKER
FOSTER CARE GIVERS

  1. Iowa: CPS Social Worker Charged With Perjury during TPR Hearing ...

    fightcps.com/.../iowa-cps-social-worker-charged-with-perjury-during-tpr...

    Jun 14, 2007 - An Iowa CPS social worker has been charged with perjury for lying during a TPR hearing.
    You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 9/5/13

  2. Social worker's perjury trial to start Wednesday

    wcfcourier.com/.../social-worker...perjury.../article_764a86fa-2f72-55e1...

    Jan 8, 2008 - INDEPENDENCE - The trial for a Buchanan County social workercharged with three counts of perjury is slated to begin Wednesday.

  3. Hold Social Services accountable for their abusive/perjury actions.

    https://www.change.org/.../office-of-children-and-family-services-hold-s...

    Too many families are pulled apart by social services that don't need to be. This happens when a case worker lies/mis-leads and keeps out actual facts...


  1. social worker gets 5 years in prison for perjury and falsifying ...

    billandsharon9.wordpress.com/.../social-worker-gets-5-years-in-prison-f...

    Aug 27, 2013 - SOCIAL WORKER GETS 5 YEARS IN PRISON FOR PERJURY AND FALSIFYING EVIDENCE!!!.

SALLY SCHROER AND CARI KRENIK SPEND EXTRA MONEY TO MAINTAIN PARENTAL ALIENATION ULTIMATELY TORTURING CHILDREN

The Termination of parental rights document lists out how much money is spent on new furniture for Tony and Melissa Dobmeier.

I am also looking for the amount of money that was spent on the parent child therapy, Sally Schroer provided for Melissa and Tony Dobmeier with Eugenie Harris's three children. 

NOTE: Sally Schroer actually provided services to the Dobmeier's to do parent child therapy with the children and denied the mother of the children to participate.


(Job Education Deficit?) 

It is my belief a trained social worker would know and understand that services are for the family. So maybe the mother and children should have been doing this therapy?

It does appear some money went to the mother helping her with rent and utilities for a month and a half but that was cut off.. Maybe  because the county could not afford parent child therapy for Melissa and tony Dobmeier and Eugenie Harris's children? while helping the mother out. 

(Job Education Deficit?) 

Then there was all that money getting pumped into foster care that was never required in the first place. Had Sally Schroer not violated the mothers home by breaking in the children would not be in foster care. Even with Sally Schroer breaking in or invited in according to Minnesota law she still could not remove those kids legally based on the circumstances mother did nothing wrong. 

You know who did? 

Sally Schroer 15 year child protection worker just broke in to someones private residence with zero evidence of consent, a warrant or exigent circumstances.

(Job Education Deficit?) 

Sally Schroer's education deficiency  not only extends to her job's actual purpose example give service to mother not foster care people.  Sally Schroer's ignorance goes beyond that. She clearly fails to grasp the severity of her ignorance when it comes to doing her job in accordance with the law.

Ironically it just makes me giggle she claims the children were removed for an education deficit. 

One Email says Sally Schroer thinks the mother has a low IQ, oh  wait that was Shari Solheim. She sent an email to a program director saying Genie has a low IQ and is too stupid to parent...

 There are two sides to every coin Shari.

For example sending out an email like that makes you too stupid to work in a human service department. 
(Sally Schroer's Job Education Deficit) 
will cost the county of Le Sueur
 1) COUNTY IS BEING SUED FOR SOCIAL WORKER MAKING THREE ILLEGAL ENTRANCES IN TO THE PRIVATE RESIDENCE

 2) COUNTY IS BEING SUED FOR THE ILLEGAL ENTRANCE OF A POLICE OFFICER

 3) COUNTY IS BEING SUED FOR THE ABDUCTION OF 3 SMALL CHILDREN THAT WERE REMOVED FROM THEIR HOME WITH OUT EVIDENCE OF IMMINENT DANGER

 4) COUNTY IS BEING SUED FOR LAWYERS INVOLVEMENT IN HOLDING CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE WHEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SAYS NO MALTREATMENT SHALL BE FOUND

IT WOULD HAVE BEEN CHEAPER FOR THE COUNTY  TO HIRE AN EDUCATED HUMAN SERVICE CHILD PROTECTION WORKER BECAUSE MAYBE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN NO BREAKING AND ENTERING ABDUCTIONS AND ASSAULTS ON CHILDREN AND THEIR MOTHER.

SALLY SCHROER'S (Education Deficit) EXTENDS TO HER KNOWLEDGE OF POVERTY. DEAR DEAR EDUCATION DEFICIT SALLY I HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO LIVE WITH MY FATHER WHO HAD A POOL IN THE BACK YARD OR LIVE WITH MY MOTHER WHO COULD NOT ALWAYS AFFORD HEAT IN THE WINTER AND COULD NOT AFFORD A CAR.

I OPTED TO LIVE WITH MY MOTHER. THAT IS HOW IGNORANT THIS LADY IS... WE WERE POOR BUT WE WERE TOGETHER AND TOGETHER WE COULD FIGURE ANYTHING OUT. COULD YOU IMAGINE THE WORLD AND WHAT IT WOULD BE LIKE WITH OUT THE POOR. THE WORLD WOULD BE FULL OF PEOPLE TEARING FAMILIES APART BECAUSE THEY ARE POOR.

OR THEY WOULD BE TEARING FAMILIES APART BECAUSE THEY ASSUMED PEOPLE WHO WERE ABUSED ALWAYS ABUSE.

WE WOULD HAVE A WORLD WITH OUT LOVE AND COMPASSION AND STRENGTH.



SALLY SCHROER WENT IN TO THE HOME AND MADE UP A STORY ABOUT HEARING A BABY CRY  SHE HAD THE OFFICER COME WHO ALSO BROKE THE LAW WHEN HE ENTERED THE HOME.

A TRAINED SOCIAL WORKER WOULD KNOW THAT IF SHE DID BELIEVE THE CHILD WAS ABOUT TO DIE AND ENTERED THE HOME, YOU DO NOT GET TO WALK AROUND THE HOME, PULLING OPEN DRAWERS AND AND CLOSETS. YOU DO GET TO STAY IN ONE ROOM AND MAKE SURE ALL KIDS ARE ACCOUNTED FOR BUT YOU MAY NOT INTERROGATE CHILDREN OPEN DRAWERS ETC.

SALLY SCHROER BROKE AND ENTERED THREE TIMES INTERROGATING CHILDREN NONE OF WHICH WERE CRYING SHE WAS DIGGING THROUGH DRESSERS AND CLOSETS .
A TRAINED SOCIAL WORKER WAITS IN THE ROOM THEY ENTERED AND SITS WITH CHILDREN UNTIL HELP COMES. OR PARENT COMES.

THE MOTHER HAD A HOME FOR VISITS TO TAKE PLACE COUNTY REFUSES TO WORK WITH MOTHER AND CHOOSES TO PAY IRENE CHRISTENSEN MORE MONEY IN HOURS

TO REINFORCE ISOLATION OF MOTHER WHO HAS A DISABILITY AND I HAVE A TAPE RECORDING OF CARI SAYING IF YOU DONT LIKE IT GET A LAWYER. NO CARI, NO THANK YOU, NO ONE LIKES THAT YOU SAID THAT AND NOW I WOULD LIKE TO WELCOME YOU TO THE WORLD OF EUGENIE HARRIS.

CARI KRENIK IT IS YOUR TURN TO BE INVESTIGATED FOR ABUSE THE DIFFERENCE IS  YOU ARE THE ABUSER BEING INVESTIGATED AND THERE IS PROOF THAT YOU ARE AN ABUSER THERE IS NO PROOF THAT EUGENIE HARRIS ABUSED OR NEGLECTED. I HAVE THOUSANDS OF SHEETS SHOWING SHE AND HER CHILDREN WERE ACCOSTED BY  YOU CARI KRENIK ENJOY THE INVESTIGATION


MOREWASTED MONEY TO ABUSE THE MOTHER AND CHILDREN
 SALLY SCHROER PAYS FOR A DRIVER TO GO TO FARIBAULT  AND PICK UP MOTHER AND DRIVE HER TO LE CENTER THAT IS A TWO WAY TRIP THEN THE DRIVER PICKS HER UP AT THE END OF THE VISIT AND DRIVES HER BACK TO FARIBAULT AND DRIVES HIMSELF BACK TO LE CENTER

WHEN IRENE CHRISTENON WOULD HANDLE OTHER SUPERVISED VISITS BY DRIVING DIRECTLY TO FARIBAULT AND GOING BACK TO LE CENTER

EUGENIE HARRIS WAS TREATED DIFFERENTLY.

THE COUNTY PAID FOR FOSTER CARE AND RESIDENTAL TREATMENT FOR MOTHER WHEN THEY WERE SUPPOSE TO SEND CHILDREN AND MOTHER TO THE SAME

CARI KRENIK INHUMANE SEPARATION OF SMALL CHILDREN FROM MOTHER CHILDREN SHOWING SYMPTOMS OF TORTURE


THE COUNTY IS INCAPABLE AND UNDER EDUCATED IN ACTING IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD
WHICH IS SELF EXPLANATORY BEING A TEENAGER IN FOSTER CARE TRIED TO COMITT SUICIDE WHEN A CHILD PROTECTION WORKER REMOVED THE CHILD FROM FOSTER PARENTS THE CHILD LOVED. THE REASON THE CHILD TURNED OF AGE TO DRIVE. WHEN THE CHILD RECEIVED THEIR PERMIT THE FOSTER PARENT STARTED TEACHING THE CHILD HOW TO DRIVE ACCORDING TO THE LAW AND THE RIGHT OF PASSAGE EVERY CHILD GOES THROUGH AT THIS AGE. LE SUEUR COUNTY SAID IT WAS AGAINST THE RULE TO ALLOW THE TEEN WITH A PERMIT TO DRIVE A CAR WITH A LICENSED DRIVER. THE CHILD WAS ABRUPTLY REMOVED FROM THE HOME AND PLACED SOMEWHERE ELSE FORCED TO CHANGE SCHOOLS. THE CHILD BECAME DEPRESSED AND TRIED TO TAKE THEIR OWN LIFE AS A RESULT OF THE ABRUPT REMOVAL. 

THEY DID NOT PROVIDE THE MOTHER WITH ANY INFORMATION AS TO WHAT WAS GOING TO HAPPEN OR HOW TO PLAN THOUGH MOTHER ASKED. IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THEY PLAN ON DRUGGING THE CHILDREN TO NUMB THEM BECAUSE THEY HAVE RESPONDED POORLY TO THE DOBMEIER'S CARE BECAUSE THEY WERE NEVER ABUSED UNTIL SALLY SCHROER BROKE IN THEIR HOME AND ASSAULTED THEM



THEY WERE THEN FORCED TO PARTICIPATE IN TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER'S FANTASY WHICH REQUIRED ERASING IDENTITY AND RIGGING THE GAME TO GET RID OF THERE MOM. WHO NEVER ABUSED THEM AND MET ALL THEIR NEEDS EXCEPT WHEN IT CAME TO POVERTY




  • YOU HAVE MY KIDS ANSWER THE PHONE‏

Eugenie Harris (eugenieharris@outlook.com)
6/05/13
To: sschroer@co.le-sueur.mn.us, lfreeman@co.le-sueur.mn.us
From:eugenieharris@outlook.com
Saved:Wed 6/05/13 2:15 PM
To:sschroer@co.le-sueur.mn.us (sschroer@co.le-sueur.mn.us); lfreeman@co.le-sueur.mn.us (lfreeman@co.le-sueur.mn.us)

Friday, October 25, 2013

LE CENTER SUPPORT

THE MOTHER WANTS TO THANK ALL OF YOU FROM THE COUNTY OF LE SUEUR AND TOWN OF LE CENTER WHO ARE OUTRAGED BY COUNTY OFFICIAL CONDUCT.  THE MOTHER APPRECIATES YOUR SUPPORT.

SHE IS HOWEVER CONCERNED TO ACCEPT HELP FROM ANY OF YOU BECAUSE SALLY SCHROER BROKE IN TO THE MOTHERS HOME AND TOOK HER KIDS WITH ZERO ABUSE OR NEGLECT. SHE HAD THE COUNTY LAWYERS MAKE UP VIOLATIONS THAT DO NOT APPLY. THEY THEN TORTURED HER FOR A YEAR.

THAT MEANS IF ANY OF YOU HAVE CHILDREN YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN ARE NOT SAFE. THIS EXTENDS BEYOND JUST A CHILD PROTECTION WORKER.

A JUDGE
A CHILD PROTECTION WORKER
A CHILD PROTECTION WORKER
ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
COUNTY ATTORNEY
HEAD OF HUMAN SERVICES
SUPERVISOR OF HUMAN SERVICES
POLICE OFFICER
FOSTER CARE GIVERS VERY DANGEROUS PEOPLE AS WELL.

I AM AND THE MOTHER IS CONCERNED FOR THE LIVES OF YOUR CHILDREN WITH THIS KIND OF CHILD TRAFFICKING GOING ON.

WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN IS THE PEOPLE IN THOSE POSITIONS ARE GOING TO BANKRUPT THE COUNTY. THE BOYS ARE BEING DRUGGED BECAUSE  COUNTY WORKER CARI KRENIK WANTED TO DRAG THIS OUT AS LONG AS SHE CAN. IT COULD COST THE COUNTY QUITE A BIT OF MONEY I HOPE MOTHER DOES NOT SETTLE THE COUNTY INHUMANELY SEPARATED HER AND HER CHILDREN  AS MENTIONED BEFORE AND HAS LEFT THEM IN THE CARE OF DANGEROUS PEOPLE ACCORDING TO MS NOAKES THEY ARE HARMING HER CHILDREN


APELLATE COURT WILL LOOK FOR TESTIMONY FROM MS BRACKEN IF JUDGE DID HIS JOB CORRECTLY

THE APPELLATE COURT WILL LOOK FOR TESTIMONY FROM MS BRACKEN TO SEE WHY BAXTER MADE THE  DECISION TO SEPARATE A FAMILY PERMANENTLY WHEN SUPPORTING TESTIMONY SAID THE CHILDREN CONTINUE TO GET WORSE UNDER THE CARE OF TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER.

THERE IS MULTIPLE REQUESTS FOR MS BRACKEN'S TESTIMONY AND THE JUDGE SPECIFICALLY DENIED MS BRACKEN TO SPEAK.

THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR THE APPELLATE COURT TO NOTE MS BRACKEN IS DENIED OPPORTUNITY TO TESTIFY. MULTIPLE TIMES THE REQUEST WAS MADE AND MULTIPLE TIMES BAXTER DENIED. THIS EXPOSES THE JUDGES AGENDA TO INTENTIONALLY HARM THE MOTHER AND HER CHILDREN.

NOT AS IF THIS IS THE FIRST TIME BAXTER HAVING AN AGENDA WAS EXPOSED BECAUSE IN APRIL HE STATES HE CANT ALLOW THE CHILDREN TO GO WITH MS BRACKEN BECAUSE HE WILL HAVE TO GET THEM BACK?

UMMMMM WHAT!!! NO BECAUSE THEY WILL BE WITH THEIR GRANDMOTHER AND WITH THEIR MOTHER UNDER SUPERVISION.

BAXTER HAS TAKEN AN OATH PROMISING TO ALLOW ALL INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED TO BE HEARD. BAXTER CAN ONLY MAKE DECISIONS BASED ON EVIDENCE AND LAWS. IF BAXTER DOES NOT ALLOW BOTH SIDES TO BE HEARD AND IGNORES LAWS VIOLATING THE RIGHTS OF A PERSON HE HAS EFFECTIVELY DECIDED HE IS NOT FIT TO BE A JUDGE

BAXTER SPECIFICALLY REFUSES MS BRACKEN TO TESTIFY...

I JUST FOUND SUPPORTING INFORMATION THAT STATE OF MINNESOTA PLACES OBSERVERS IN COURT ROOMS TO PREVENT JUDICIAL ABUSE AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN AS IN THE CASE OF WHAT HAPPENED HERE. THERE IS AN BELIEF THAT WOMEN AND CHILDREN ARE HIGH RISK TO BE ABUSED IN CHILD PROTECTION CASES BY THE OFFICIALS INVOLVED.

AFTER GOING THROUGH ALL THIS EVIDENCE I CAN SEE THAT IT IS TRUE.

MINNESOTA HAS ALMOST NO RECORD OF COUNTIES TRAFFICKING CHILDREN OF THE POOR  LIKE THIS. IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT IT DOES  NOT HAPPENED BUT MOST STATES HAVE A REPUTATION OF REPEATED ABUSE OF ILLEGAL SEPARATION AND FORCED ADOPTION. SOME OF THOSE STATES THAT ARE WELL KNOWN FOR TRAFFICKING THE CHILDREN OF THE POOR FOR FORCED ADOPTIONS LIKE BAXTER JUST DID; ARE  KENTUCKY , TEXAS, CALIFORNIA AND FLORIDA.

THERE IS ONE OTHER CASE IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, A GRANDMOTHER IS FIGHTING FOR HER GRANDCHILDREN. SHE IS IN A CUSTODY BATTLE WITH FOSTER PARENTS.  

I AM ASSUMING THAT THE STATE OF MINNESOTA IS NOT EXPERIENCING ALLOT OF UNLAWFUL SOCIAL WORKER ABDUCTIONS IS BECAUSE THOSE INVOLVED ARE DEALT WITH. THE STATE ALSO TRAINED AND PLANTED BUGS IN THE COURT ROOM.

TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER NEVER ENTERING THE COURT ROOM THE SAME WAY EVERYONE ELSE DOES IS EVIDENT



PSYCHOLOGIST INSISTS JUDGE TERMINATED THE RIGHTS OF THE WRONG PERSON DOBMEIER'S ABUSING CHILDREN AND SEEM TO BE AWARE AND GOOD WITH THAT

TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER'S ATTENDANCE AT EVERY HEARING MAKES THEM LOOK LIKE THEY ARE SICK, SELFISH INDIVIDUALS, ROSE VALDEZ AGREES THAT IT IS VERY RARE FOR SOMEONE IN THEIR POSITION TO SHOW UP AT HEARING LIKE THAT ROOTING FOR THE BREAK DOWN OF A FAMILY SO THEIR NEEDS CAN BE MET

THE PSYCHOLOGIST POINTS OUT THAT THEY ARE NOT SAFE BECAUSE THEY RECOGNIZE THE SEVERE PAIN THE CHILDREN ARE IN YET STILL THEY CONTINUE TO WORK TOWARD DISSOLVING THE FAMILY KNOWING THE CHILDREN WILL BE DESTROYED BY THE SEPARATION.

THE PSYCHOLOGIST IS IN SHOCK THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE EVEN ALLOWED TO DO FOSTER CARE BASED ON THE LEVEL OF ABUSE THEY WILL INFLICT AND ACCEPT PUTTING CHILDREN THROUGH TO MEET THEIR OWN NEEDS

THE SHRINK WAS EVEN MORE CONCERNED WHEN CARI KRENIK TURNED THE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS INTO A WHOSE THE BETTER PARENT COMPETITION.

THE SHRINK SAID MOTHER HAS A HISTORY OF REMOVING HER SELF AND CHILDREN OUT OF ABUSIVE SITUATION

WHILE TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER STAND UP AND SAY THEY ARE AWARE THEY ARE ABUSING CHILDREN SPECIALISTS SAY CHILDREN ARE GETTING WORSE IN THEIR CARE AND THE COUNTY TERMINATED THE WRONG PARENTS RIGHTS



BACKING THIS IS THE PSYCHOLOGIST WHO IS CONSIDERING REPORTING THEM

ON THE RECORD OFF THE RECORD WOOPS SOMEONE FOUND A LOOP HOLE HAHAHAHA

SALLY SCHROER WAS GIVEN  RECOMMENDATIONS TO SEND MOTHER TO A FACILITY WITH CHILDREN FOR INPATIENT FOLLOW UP  CARE. DOCUMENTATION SHOWS THAT BOTH TIMES MOTHER IS SENT TO FOLLOW UP CARE WITH OUT CHILDREN. PERJURY CAN BE SEEN WITH INCONSISTANT TESTIMONY. NEVER MIND THE ENTIRE FINDING OF FACTS WILL SHOW THAT A JUDGE HAS HIS SIGNATURE ON THE FINDING OF FACTS IN WHICH HE JUSTIFIED TERMINATING THE MOTHERS RIGHTS. SALLY SCHROER WRITES IN THE ORDER UNDER TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS MOTHER IS A NO SHOW FOR WELCOME MANOR WHERE HER CHILDREN ULTIMATELY COULD HAVE JOINED HER.

SALLY SCHROER WRITES THIS IMPLYING MOTHER OPTED OUT OF A SERVICE KNOWING SHE WOULD BE REUNITED WITH HER CHILDREN. SHE DOES NOT SAY I TOLD MOTHER CHILDREN COULD NOT GO.

SALLY SCHROER THAN DOCUMENTS TELLING ANITA BRACKEN A LIE WHEN SHE CONFRONTS SCHROER ABOUT WHAT A REASONABLE EFFORT IS.  NOT ALLOWING THE CHILDREN TO GO WAS A MISTAKE. SALLY SCHROER LIED TO ANITA BRACKEN AND DOCUMENTED SHE LIED IN HER CHRONOLOGY REPORT SHE TELLS ANITA THE CHILDREN WERE GOING TO  JOIN HER IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS..

ON THE STAND THE COMPULSIVE LIAR STRUGGLES AND STATES SHE WOULD ONLY DO AN OVER NIGHT THAT INDICATES SALLY SCHROER IS COMMITTING PERJURY WITH HOLDING EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE WITH THE INTENT TO HARM THE MOTHER.

UNDER REASONABLE EFFORT ANYTIME THE WORKER FAILS TO REUNITE MOTHER WITH HER CHILDREN SAFELY ; WHICH RESULTS IN AN UNNECESSARY SEPARATION OF THE PARENT AND CHILD THE WORKER IS COMMITTING A CRIME AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN

SALLY SCHROER DOCUMENTS CUTTING SERVICES FORCING MOTHER IN TO HOMELESSNESS THIS IS A CRIME AGAINST SOMEONE WITH A DISABILITY.

CUT SERVICES AND UNNECESSARY DRUG TREATMENT CENTERS PROLONG SEPERATION WHILE SCHROER IGNORES CASE PLAN
.

THE MOTHERS CHILDREN HAVE ATTACHMENT DISORDER AND DEVELOPMENTAL TRAUMA DISORDER BECAUSE CARI KRENIK COMMITTED A CRIME AGAINST WOMEN AND CHILDREN AND SOMEONE WITH A DISABILITY

IT HAS BEEN POINTED OUT FOR THE APPELLATE COURT TO LOOK FOR SERVICES FOLLOWING IMPATIENT FOUNTAIN CENTERS THAT INDICATE SERVICES WERE OFFERED AND DENIED BY MOTHER THAT FOLLOWED RECOMMENDATIONS OF INPATIENT FOLLOW UP CARE. THERE IS ZERO SERVICES OFFERED FOR MOTHER THAT FOLLOWED RECOMMENDATIONS TO REUNITE. ONLY DENIED REQUESTS TO FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS BY THE COUNTY WORKER  WHICH IS HIDDEN. THE LOOPHOLE IS IT CAN BE PROVEN NOW TWO TIMES SALLY SCHROER HID EVIDENCE WITH INTENT TO HARM A BABY


CARI KRENIK AND THE WAY SHE REMOVED THE CHILDREN AND IGNORED THE FACT THE BOYS HAVE  A DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER WILL PUT HER BEHIND BARS. ATTACHMENT DISORDER

MY FAVORITE IS CARI KRENIK STATES MOTHER SAYS BOYFRIEND IS CONTROLING.? WELL SO IS SALLY SCHROER SO WHATS YOUR DAMN POINT SALLY SCHROER HAS PROVEN EVIDENCE SHE CAUSED A BABY TO HAVE A MENTAL BREAKDOWN




Thursday, October 24, 2013

Dissabilities and Mental Illness, DID YOU KNOW SOMEONE WHO IS MENTALLY ILL CAN WORK THEIR WAY IN TO A POSITION FOR CHILD PROTECTION

These two boys are experiencing symptoms of complex post traumatic stress disorder  which is the result of being tortured in captivity for a prolong period of time. 

If you see us many county officials had to break many laws which resulted in a developmental disorder. A mandated reporter added up the list of crimes that were committed with intent to harm us  then compared it to the care our mother provided for us. The psychologist said he has no reason to believe she would ever need to be reported. 

we do know that 2 child protection case workers Sally Schroer and Kari Krenik who work for Le Sueur county in the town of Le Center  have been  reported by a mandated reporter after the psychologist determined the two workers committed crimes with intent to harm a child. Not just us but our baby sister is in danger of attachment disorder.  

The honorable Judge M Michael Baxter who committed perjury and violated the laws to violate laws that were put in place to keep our mother safe from abuse. What makes us mad is this guy is in a job that will allow him to become a threat to the community based on what he did to our mother.  The judge was more interested in the best interest of his friends then he was us guys. 

Susan Rynda blocked people who believed the mother was not safe with one of her employees. This lady did not respond with an investigation she responded with a lawyer blocking the family and refusing to honor a release and power of attorney. This was done to block the concerned family member so that abuse of the mother could continue. 

Lowell Freeman did nothing while his workers were hard at work committing crimes to violate the lives of children 

county lawyers 

tony dobmeier only cares about himself and stripped us of our identity alienated us from a loving mother 

we now are never going to be right again because the judge allowed the abusive sick mess


'of had to lie and break laws to make sure the children endure prolonged torture by tony and Melissa Dobmeier. 


ABUSIVE PEOPLE ARE MENTALLY ILL.  FOR EXAMPLE SALLY SCHROER AND CARI KRENIK WHO WERE JUST REPORTED BY A PSYCHOLOGIST, WHO IS A  MANDATED REPORTER AFTER GOING OVER EUGENIE HARRIS'S FILE. THEY AMONG OTHERS WERE GUILTY OF KNOWING THE ABUSE WAS HAPPENING OR ACTUALLY GUILTY OF PARTICIPATING IN IT.

MS BRACKEN WAS FOLLOWING CARI KRENIK'S RECOMMENDATION WHICH RESULTED IN A PSYCHOLOGIST  INFORMING EUGENIE HARRIS AND MS BRACKEN THAT THEY SHOULD KNOW HE IS A MANDATED REPORTER, AND OBLIGATED TO REPORT THIS ABUSE OF BOTH CASE WORKERS.

LE SUEUR COUNTY'S CHILD PROTECTION WORKERS  CARI KRENIK AND  SALLY SCHROER  HAVE ACTUALLY DOCUMENTED THAT THE HARRIS CHILDREN HAVE DEVELOPED COMPLEX POST TRAUMATIC STRESS SYNDROME AS THE RESULT OF AN INITIAL ASSAULT ON THE CHILDREN SEPTEMBER 21ST 2012. SALLY SCHROER BROKE IN TO THE HOME AND ILLEGALLY ABDUCTED ALL THREE CHILDREN. SALLY SCHROER FIRST TRIES TO ACCUSE MOTHER OF KEEPING CHILDREN HOME SICK WHO WERE NOT ACTUALLY SICK. ONCE THEY WENT TO THE DOCTOR SCHROER TRIES TO IMPLY THAT THEY WERE MEDICALLY NEGLECTED. SHE LATER DOCUMENTS MALTREATMENT AND LEAVES THE NUMBER OF MINUTES LEFT ALONE OUT OF THE DOCUMENTATION AND STATES OLDEST CHILD HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY LEFT ALONE TO CARE FOR HIS SIBLINGS.

JUST READING IT, I THOUGHT 8 HOURS ALONE. MS BRACKEN WANTS TO KNOW HOW MUCH CARE GIVING THE OLDEST HAD TO PROVIDE IN 5 MINUTES. MS BRACKEN WANTS TO KNOW WHY THE TIME FRAME IS LEFT OUT. MR FREEMAN CLAIMS THEY DON'T LIKE TO MUCH INFORMATION. IT LOOKS LIKE SALLY SCHROER GOES THROUGH A LIST OF RULES BUT IS UNABLE TO APPLY ANY THAT CAN LEGALLY HAVE THE CHILDREN REMOVED.

SHE IGNORED MINNESOTA MALTREATMENT SCREENING AND REMOVED  CHILDREN UNDER FALSE ALLEGATIONS. THE VIOLENCE AGAINST THE CHILDREN COMMITTED BY SCHROER WAS LIKELY THE RESULT OF HER LOW IQ OR UNDERSTANDING THAT SHE IS ABUSIVE (TO BE RULED OUT)

THE SOCIAL WORKER SPIRALED COMMITTING PERJURY AND IGNORING GLARING EVIDENCE THAT THE HARRIS CHILDREN ARE DEVELOPING COMPLEX POST TRAUMATIC STRESS SYNDROME . IF THEY WERE TO EXPERIENCE AN ASSAULT LIKE THE ONE THEY ENDURED BY SALLY SCHROER AND  THEN PLACED THEM IN A CAPTIVE ENVIRONMENT PSYCHOLOGICALLY TORTURING THEM.

INFACT MS NOAKES TELLS HER THE CHILDREN ARE GETTING WORSE THEY ARE ALSO BREAKING DOWN WHEN DOBMEIER GOES TO WORK. SCHROER THINKS THAT IS SWEET THEY ARE BONDING WITH HIM

THE PSYCHOLOGIST TOLD THE MOTHER THE SICK WOMAN'S IGNORANT REMARK. THE DR SAID THAT THE CHILDREN ARE RELIVING THE TRAUMA OF THE INITIAL ASSAULT THAT TOOK PLACE AGAINST THEM BY SALLY SCHROER TAKING THEM FROM THEIR MOTHER.

THE DR TELLS HARRIS MY GOD AND THEY CALL YOU UNEDUCATED IN HERE. MENTAL ILLNESS UNTREATED WELL AINT THAT THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK ONLY ONE PERSON HERE HAS ACTUALLY ASSAULTED, ABUSED, AND MALTREATED A CHILD AND THAT IS SALLY SCHROER AND ALSO CARI KRENIK SCHROERS ABUSIVE TAG TEAM PARTNER.
THE HARRIS CHILDREN DEFINITELY SHOWING SIGNS OF  DEVELOPMENTAL TRAUMA  DISORDER AS THE RESULT OF ABUSE IN CAPTIVITY OVER A PROLONGED PERIOD OF TIME. THEY ARE PROBABLY DRUGGING THEM FOR ATTENTION DEFICIT AND WITH PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGS TO NUMB THEM. THIS WILL LIKELY EVOLVE IN TO  PERSONALITY DISORDERS.   

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a common reaction to traumatic events such as
assault, disaster or severe accidents. The symptoms include repeated and unwanted
reexperiencing of the event, hyperarousal, emotional numbing and avoidance of stimuli
(including thoughts) which could serve as reminders for the event. Many people experience at
least some of these symptoms in the immediate aftermath of the traumatic event. A sizeable
proportion recover in the next few weeks or months, but in a signi®cant subgroup the

BABY AGE 1 EXPERIENCES A NERVOUS BREAK DOWN, 
CHILD AGE 4 STOPS EATING AND SLEEPING AND OBSESSIVELY TALKING ABOUT DEATH AND KILLING 
CHILD AGE 6 RESENTS MOTHER FOR SALLY SCHROER'S INABILITY TO REMAIN LAW ABIDING SO SHE CAN GET OFF ON BREAKING THREE CHILDREN. 

IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE REMOVED MOTHER AND EXPOSED TO SCHROER SICK LEVEL OF VIOLENCE SHE  EXPOSED THEM TO A PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA 

JUST LIKE MOM WAS.
SCHROER AMPS UP THE ABUSE AND SEEMS TO BE VERY FAMILIAR AND COMFORTABLE WITH A FORM OF ABUSE CALLED PARENTAL ALIENATION.  SALLY SCHROER BEGINS ALIENATING THE MOTHER AND THE CHILDREN GROW WORSE 

THE CHILDREN ARE NOT ABLE TO IMPROVE WITH THEIR MENTALLY DISTURBED CAPTORS PLAYING PARENTS AND  ERASING THEIR IDENTITY,. TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER APPEAR TO THRIVE GETTING THEIR NEEDS MET BY FORCING TRAUMATIZED CHILDREN IN TO PLAYING A ROLE TO MEET THEIR NEEDS. HOWEVER TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER HAVE TO TAKE AWAY THE CHILDRENS IDENTITY TO MAKE THE CHILDREN MEET THE DOBMEIERS  NEEDS. 





MINNESOTA HAS A VERY CLEAN RECORD WHEN IT COMES TO COUNTY PROTECTION WORKERS INVOLVED IN THE TRAFFICKING OF CHILDREN. SO I AM SURPRISED THESE PEOPLE WOULD ATTEMPT IT. 

Minnesota is one of the states that does the 

most to stop SOCIAL WORKERS WHO ARE 


INVOLVED WITH  CHILD TRAFFICKING