Thursday, December 12, 2013

SOMEONE SHOULD HAVE TOLD LE SUEUR COUNTY CPS WORKER KRENIK AND SCHOER THAT IT IS A CRIME TO ABUSE PEOPLE AND CHILDREN! THEIR SUPERVISOR DID NOT WANT TON STOP THEM FROM ABUSING CHILDREN AND ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES

Mother is being told she needs to compile a list of as many people involved in the crimes against her as possible.

LE SUEUR COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES

TRI CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL


LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES


TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER

ABDUCTION See also FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Children
Taking without consent, 2013 609.265
Conviction, effects, human services licensees, 2013 245C.152013 245C.24
Crime against the person, civil commitment definitions, 2013 253B.02
Developmentally disabled persons, 2013 252.05
Generally, 2013 609.265

ABUSE See also MALTREATMENT


Child abuse, see CHILD ABUSE
Children in need of protection or services, see CHILDREN IN NEED OF PROTECTION OR SERVICES
Committed persons, crimes against the person, 2013 253B.02
Definitions

Vulnerable adults, 2013 626.557
Domestic abuse, see DOMESTIC ABUSE
Home and community-based services recipients, 2013 245D.071
Policy of state, zero tolerance of violence, 2013 1.502013 15.86 Someone should have told Cari Krenik there is a zero tollerance of abuse maybe then she would have hesitated before she broke the law by committing a hate crime against Eugenie Harris and her three babies. There was no stopping her though she was determined to harm the four family members and now it will be cari missing christmas next year with her family because criminals do jail time. he will have a cell mate though with her buddy sally schroer. 
Vulnerable adults, see Abuse under VULNERABLE ADULTS

609.265 ABDUCTION.

Whoever, for the purpose of marriage, takes a person under the age of 18 years, without the consent of the parents, guardian, or other person having legal custody of such person is guilty of abduction and may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than one year or to payment of a fine of not more than $3,000, or both.


JUDGE M MICHAEL BAXTER WHO VIOLATED THE LAW AND THE MOTHERS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF SOMEONE WHO IS UNDER A PROTECTED CLASS TO FILL AN ORDER FOR CHILDREN

The worker in this case is only able to document signs of maltreatment and abuse that she is responsible for both to the mother and the children.

VIOLATION OF THE MOTHERS 4TH AMENDMENT RIGHTS
ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE
SALLY SCHROER CLAIMS SHE KNOCKED ON THE DOOR  AND HEARD A BABY CRYING OPENED DOOR AND YELLED GENIES NAME. THE FOUR YEAR OLD CAME TO THE DOOR

THERE IS NO EVIDENCE SCHROER DID THIS DESPITE PEOPLE BEING IN THE HOME AND AN OFFICER ARRIVING ON THE SCENE WHO DOES NOT BACK UP THE FACT THAT A CHILD IS CRYING IT SEEMS MORE LIKELY SCHROER WALKED IN NEVER KNOCKING AND INTERVIEWED THE CHILD.

THEN TO COVER HER ASS FOR AN ILLEGAL WARRANTLESS SEARCH SHE WENT OUTSIDE TO CALL AN OFFICER

SCHROERS FILES ARE FILLED WITH HER BREAKING THE LAW AND LYING TO PROTECT HERSELF. IT IS EASY TO PROVE SHE HAS A PERSONAL VENDETTA AGAINST THE MOTHER AND IS WILLING TO BREAK THE LAW TO HURT HER.

FURTHER MORE WHEN SCHROER ILLEGALLY ENTERED THE HOME ON THE 28TH OF SEPTEMBER SHE AGAIN WALKED IN TO THE PRIVATE RESIDENCE WITH OUT KNOCKING OUTSIDE AND WAS FOUND EXITING THE APARTMENT WHEN SHE IS MET BY THE RENTERS ON THE STAIRWELL.

THAT MEANS SHE DID NOT KNOCK WHEN SHE DISCOVERED THE CHILDREN. SHE WALKED IN AND LIED ABOUT A CRYING CHILD.

THE OFFICER ARRIVES TO DO A WELFARE CHECK AND THE LAW STATES HE MUST HAVE EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCE TO ENTER WITH OUT A WARRANT OR HE NEEDS TO GET A WARRANT OR CONSENT. THE WORD OF A CHILD PROTECTION WORKER WHO JUST BROKE THE LAW TO VIOLATE THE RENTERS RIGHT TO PRIVACY IS NOT ENOUGH FOR HIM TO OPEN THE DOOR

THE OFFICER DOES OPEN THE DOOR. tHE SOCIAL WORKER AND THE OFFICER SEARCH THE ENTIRE APARTMENT ALSO AGAINST THE LAW

THE SOCIAL WORKER BEGIN GOING THROUGH DRESSERS AND CLOSETS COMPLETELY STUPID!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! sHE THINKS EUGENIE HARRIS IS TO STUPID TO PARENT WELL I THINK SHE IS TO STUPID TO BE A CHILD PROTECTION WORKER.

THEY COURT ORDER FULL ACCESS TO HER MEDICAL RECORDS.

THEY COURT ORDER A PHYSICAL EXAMINATION OF HER BRAIN ROCHESTER CLAIMS JUDGES ARE NOT DOCTORS AND JUDGES ARE OFF THEIR ROCKERS IF THEY THINK THAT IT IS LEGAL TO COURT ORDER A GENERAL SEARCH ON HOW SOMEONES BRAIN WORKS
________________________________________________________________________
BECAUSE THE JUDGE DID NOT REVIEW EVIDENCE AND THE FINDING OF FACTS WAS WRITTEN UP BY SOMEONE WHO DID NOT ATTEND THE ENTIRE TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS

THEY LISTED THAT MOTHER DID NOT SIGN OVER MEDICAL RECORDS SHE DID MEET THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS BY SUBMITTING SPECIFIC INFORMATION SHOWING THAT SHE HAD A PHYSICAL WHICH IS ALL THEY WANTED AND SHE PROVIDED PROOF HAD CARI KRENIK PARTICIPATED IN THE HEARING SHE WOULD HAVE KNOWN THAT. THE JUDGE BASICALLY RUBBER STAMPED THIS

SALLY SCHROER LISTS PRIVATE INFORMATION OF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE IN TPR ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
DUE PRCESS
_______________________________________________________________________________
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT  TO PARENT AND MAKE DECISIONS FOR HER CHILDREN
UNLAWFUL SEPARATION
________________________________________________________________________________
HATE CRIME
_________________________________________________________________________________
DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE

_________________________________________________________________________________




against the young mother when she commits perjury, the assistant county attorney rather than act in a professional way by advising the the county worker that perjury is illegal and that she should stop the case worker shuts down all aspects of communication to the person asking why a child protection worker paid with tax dollars is committing a crime against a person who has a disability and her children.

Judge M Michael Baxter: Irene Christenson, visitation supervisor do you swear to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth
Irene Christenson: I do!
Lawyer: do the children ever get upset when  they have to leave their mother?
Irene Christenson: NO NEVER

Evidence that county employees with held details with intent to harm the children and mother. Listen to the two year old that belongs to this mother.Listen to her scream.
[A] claim of deliberate indifference, unlike one of negligence, ... implies at a minimum that defendants were plainly placed on notice of a danger and chose to ignore the danger notwithstanding the notice."1
In Tilton v Playboy, the plaintiff sued the defendant for use of explicit material involving a person under the age of majority. Justice Pryor of the United States Court of Appeals wrote:
"Hate Crime Legal Definition:
The subtly or overt victimization of an individual, for no reason other than skin color, religion, parental heritage, disability, sexual orientation, gender or gender identity.

At Chapter 12-19, §38(a) of the State of Rhode Island General Laws, under the title Hate Crimes Sentencing Act, 2013, this:Also known as bias crimes1 or criminal harassment motivated by racially or other grounds protected under localhuman rights or criminal statutes.
"If any person has been convicted of a crime charged by complaint, information, or indictment in which he or she intentionally selected the person against whom the offense is committed or selected the property that is damaged or otherwise affected by the offense because of the actor's hatred or animus toward the actual or perceived disability,religion, color, race, national origin or ancestry, sexual orientation, or gender of that person or the owner or occupant of that property, he or she shall be subject to the penalties provided in this section."We have long recognized that the knowledge element of a statute can be proved by demonstrating either actual knowledge or deliberate ignorance. Knowledge through deliberate indifference occurs where a party acts with an awareness of the high probability of the existence of the fact in question."
 This does fall under civil law as a hate crime Sally schroer, Cari Krenik claim that if the mother requires assistance to maintain her home she is not eligible to be the parent to her children. Sally schroer blasts private information in the tpr cari krenik said causing the children to have developmental delays is not as big of a deal as it is for them to not live in a home that public assistance pays for. I am pretty sure that is how backwaRDS  Le sueur county mental health specialists are growing up poor is worse then growing up with personality disorders Shari Solheim documents mother is to stupid to be a parent because she was tortured as a child and seems to have problems when we are torturing her as well. She will never get those kids back. Both case workers show premeditated intent to harm the mother when they are both willing to commit crimes against her to seperate her children and cut services.