Wednesday, November 20, 2013




This is partially what we too are arguing. 


Due to the social worker SALLY SCHROER / 

CARI KRENIK
 providing false

 testimony, knowingly fraudulent reports,

 omission of evidence etc., the court and 

other "professionals" relied on these 

statements to make critical decisions and

 delay and/or prevent reunification or even 

basic normal contact and to deny parental 

decision making. So, in my opinion, this all 

falls under violations to our families

 constitutional rights, therefore a 1983 suit.

THEN THERE IS THE ILLEGAL SEARCH AND

 SEIZURE OF SALLY SCHROER AND OFFICER

 TRACEY HANNA.  

SALLY SCHROER BREAKING AND ENTERING IN TO THE HOME 3 DIFFERENT TIMES. 

IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THEY LIFTED FINGER PRINTS OFF OF  THE DRESSERS SALLY

 SCHROER WENT THROUGH WHEN SHE BROKE IN TO THE HOME THE SECOND TIME. 

THE POLICE OFFICER ENTERING ON THE WORD OF OF A SOCIAL WORKER WITH NO

 PROOF OF EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES. POOR GUY WAS NOT AWARE OF SALLY 

SCHROER'S ALCOHOL PROBLEM BY LE SUEUR COUNTY'S DEFINITION OF AN ADDICT 

THAT MAY BE WHY SHE HAS TO LIE PATHOLOGICALLY