I just found this in my group the county will have to pay every thing back for foster care or any funding that they received that did not comply with reasonable effort. Minnesota states any issue that is poverty related cannot be called neglect or maltreatment . The only recourse a social worker who just made an illegal search and seizure by breaking in to a home has when they stumble on a poverty related issue is to offer services to help the mother to prevent the situation.
Anita Bracken when putting together her case plan found two separate resources that offered a free phone and the mother always had a phone from the time Anita Bracken started helping organize her case plan.
Sally Schroer caused and describes a terroristic removal of children causing them to experience mental break downs.
If Sally Schroer removed the children she is now in contempt of the law. her crimes breaking and entering, an illegal search and seizure not just but once but twice, she is also in contempt of not making a reasonable effort.
Now if Sally Schroer fails to reunite the children under safe circumstances forcing an unnecessary separation which she is guilty of upon the first removal, then there is welcome manor, and New York Mills and a family member who came forward. We now have a total of four times that can be verified that Sally Schroer broke the reasonable effort law by taking funds fraudulently.
She also cut services to a mother with a disability that means because i can prove there was no maltreatment because it was poverty related to the grand jury which as long as I have proof it does not matter what the judge did when he violated and singled out this mother so he could give her children away. the only way reasonable effort was made would be to receive services to help with out removing the children.
there were zero services
if I can prove the social worker ignored the case plan attachment keep family involved and mother will be completely involved in both boys education. if all that was done. wait it was not done.
if sally schroer even once did not reunite the family in safe conditions through out the chips before services were stopped by the county then she did not make a reasonable effort!!!!!!!!!
if housing was cut putting mother on the street then no reasonable effort
sally schroer blocked the mother from being reunited with her children 3 times which would have been supervised this can all be in a complaint with proof
if sally schroer did not allow the mother to help create her own case plan she did not make reasonable effort
THE JUDGE WHO DENIED THIS MOTHER DUE PROCESS HAS NO SAY IF YOU CAN PROVE IT IN YOUR COMPLAINT
THAT WE CAN DO !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! THE JUDGE WHO VIOLATED THIS MOTHER TO DESTROY HER LIFE CANNOT LIE OUT OF THIS
Services to Families in Crisis - as mandated by 42 U.S.C. § 671 (a) (15) and § 672 (a) (1) — an agency cannot be reimbursed for the cost of a child's out-of-home care unless the reasonable efforts requirement is met.