Wednesday, October 23, 2013

RECOMMENDATIONS OF CARI KRENIK....

KARI KRENIK MEETS WITH MOM WHEN ANITA BRACKEN IS NOT PRESENT... THAT WAS A REALLY BAD MOVE FOR CARI  WHO HAS PROVIDED ENOUGH SUPPORTING EVIDENCE THAT SHE WILL BE RED FLAGGED WITH MALTREATMENT OF A CHILD AND AN ADULT WITH A DISABILITY.

CARI TELLS MOM YOU ARE ENTITLED TO A FAREWELL VISIT. WE THINK YOU SHOULD MEET WITH A PSYCHOLOGIST TO FIND OUT HOW YOU SHOULD EXPLAIN TO YOUR CHILDREN;THAT YOU WONT BE AROUND. CARI TELLS MOTHER  IT MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA TO HAVE THE FOLLOWING PEOPLE WITH YOU.

KARI KRENIK- SEEMS TO GET A PHYSICAL AND EMOTIONAL PLEASURE  AS A RESULT OF THE TORTURE OF BABIES (TO BE RULED OUT) MADE THREATS TO MOTHER'S CHILDREN INSISTING IF SHE WERE TO HAVE TO DEAL WITH MS BRACKEN SHE WOULD TELL THE JUDGE TO TERMINATE NOW...CARI CREATED 50 + FALSE REASONS TO TERMINATE MOTHERS RIGHTS TO SATISFY HER OWN PSYCHOLOGICAL NEED (TO BE RULED OUT) AND PROLONG THE  TORTURE OF VULNERABLE CITIZENS .

IRENE CHRISTENSEN - 
THERE IS FACTUAL EVIDENCE THAT SHE LIED IN SUPERVISED VISIT DOCUMENTATION. SHE LIED UNDER OATH ON THE STAND WITH THE INTENT TO HARM... THERE IS NO TO BE RULED OUT. TAPE RECORDINGS AND SIGNATURES OF PEOPLE INVOLVED ATTESTING THIS TO BE TRUE.  

ROSE VALDEZ - 
ANITA BRACKEN STARTED ATTENDING COURT HEARINGS AND LOOKED UP THIS LADIES RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE CHILD. ANITA BRACKEN'S COURT RECORDINGS ROSE VALDEZ IS ASKED WHAT DO YOU THINK CAN THE BOYS STAY WITH MS BRACKEN. VALDEZ RESPOND I DON'T THINK SO SHE HAS AN ON AGAIN OFF AGAIN RELATIONSHIP WITH HER SON. SUDDENLY I HEAR A LOUD GASP LIKE SOMEONE WAS SHOCKED. i ASKED ANITA ABOUT THIS AND SHE INFORMED ME ROSE VALDEZ MADE A STATEMENT THAT SHE COULD HAVE NOT POSSIBLY KNOWN THE ANSWER TO AND HER JOB IS TO ACT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD. SHE SHOULD HAVE TOLD THE JUDGE SHE WOULD LIKE TO MEET WITH MS BRACKEN TO SEE IF THAT WOULD BE IN THE CHILDS BEST INTEREST. SHE CHOSE TO MAKE SOMETHING UP INDICATING THIS LADY IS DANGEROUS AND INTENTIONALLY NOT ACTING IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD.

_____________________________________________________________________________________
ANITA BRACKEN REPORTS THAT SHE AGREES WITH KRENIK TO SOME DEGREE BUT BELIEVES THAT CORRECT AND TRUE FACTS SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE PSYCHOLOGIST TO CORRECTLY HELP THE MOTHER WITH THE TASK. BRACKEN GOES THROUGH THE MOUNTAIN OF PAPER WORK THAT PROVIDES SUPPORTING EVIDENCE TO ALL THE LAWS THAT WERE VIOLATED AND BY WHOM TO HELP THE PSYCHOLOGIST CORRECTLY ASSIST MOTHER WITH THE CONVERSATION. 

THE APPOINTMENT WAS MADE 
MS BRACKEN TAKES MOTHER WITH THE MOUND OF EVIDENCE TAPE RECORDINGS AND NOTE BOOKS OF DOCUMENTATION AND EXPLAINS WHY MOTHER IS NOT WITH HER CHILDREN AND THAT CARI KRENIK WANTS MOTHER TO BE PREPARED TO KNOW HOW TO TELL HER CHILDREN WHY SHE IS NOT WITH THEM. THE PSYCHOLOGIST RESPONDS WITH ( I HOPE YOU KNOW I AM A MANDATED REPORTER AND I WILL NEED TO FOLLOW UP ON THIS BY REPORTING THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS FOR INTENTIONAL ABUSE AND NEGLECT OF A CHILD AND AN ADULT WITH A DISABILITY 

SALLY SCHROER -CHILD PROTECTION WORKER
CARI KRENIK -CHILD PROTECTION WORKER
M MICHAEL BAXTER -JUDGE
SUSAN RYNDA-HEAD OF HUMAN SERVICES 
MEGAN GAUDETTE -ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY
LOWELL FREEMAN- SUPERVISOR FOR CHILD PROTECTION 
ROSE VALDEZ - GUARDIAN AD LITEM 

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THE WORKER WHO WOULD TELL YOU TO COME HERE KNOWING I AM A MANDATED REPORTER 
THEY DOCUMENTED INTENTIONALLY BREAKING SPECIFIC LAWS TO INTENTIONALLY HARM CHILDREN AND ADULTS
WOW. 
I THINK ITS BETTER THAT SHE NOT TELL THE KIDS SHE IS NOT GOING TO BE AROUND BECAUSE THESE PEOPLE ARE GOING TO REGRET THIS . I DID TELL THEM SHE WILL BE SUING THEM AND THAT BECAUSE THE SOCIAL WORKERS LOST IMMUNITY WITH THE FIRST FALSE REPORT THEY BOTH MADE SHOWING INTENT TO HARM A CHILD AND EXPLOIT AN ADULT THEY CAN BE LEGALLY CHARGED. 
THE PSYCHOLOGIST SAID WELL I AM SORRY BUT I AM A MANDATED REPORTER AND YOU JUST PRESENTED ME WITH PROOF THE PEOPLE ARE A THREAT (NOTES OF ANITA BRACKEN)