Sunday, September 15, 2013

FINDING OF FACTS PART 2 JUDGE M MICHAEL BAXTER BABY BROKER




                               

THE BOYS REACTING TO THEIR MOTHER GOING TO GET DRINKS FROM THE CAR 

A JUDGE IS COMMITTING PERJURY IN 1-30 + STATEMENTS; Perjury affects the integrity of the judicial fact-finding process, all offenders should be vigorously prosecuted. Cases may be submitted to the grand jury ...

FINDING OF FACT
I MISSED THE END NOTES AT THE END OF the PAGE MOTHER IS LIVING TRANSIENT LIFE STYLE AND LIVING IN TENT JULY AND AUGUST WITH ALL THREE CHILDREN LIVING WITH HER.  INCORRECT information.

If mother is living in an apartment when the county gets involved then it sounds like any hardship the family suffered was corrected and while maybe it is not common for people to go homeless in Le Center it happens all over the United States and families may for a time go with out housing. The Ombudsman I interviewed who is now a lawyer who's children are now grown told me for a time she lived in a car with her children.

As a child protection case worker myself I was told if a family is homeless it is my job to find them resources to correct their conditions. So the above remark is a sign of discrimination and bias against situations that are the result of someone's socioeconomic status.
Education for Justice Fact Sheets
By Mid-Minnesota Legal Aid and Legal Services State Support

Education for Justice  P.O. Box 14246  St. Pa




Can my rights be terminated just because things in my life are hard?
Your rights can’t be terminated just because you physically or financially can’t provide for your children. This means that having a disability, being homeless, or being poor are not good 
enough reasons to terminate your rights. A social worker can work with you to find resources 

to help you.


WHAT IF MY SOCIAL WORKER INTENTIONALLY CUTS RENTAL ASSISTANCE AND DID NOT TELL ME ?   I ASKED MY SOCIAL WORKER FOR HELP SO I WOULD NOT GO HOMELESS WITH NO MONEY, NO FOOD, NO PHONE, AND NO TRANSPORTATION 

(MY SOCIAL WORKER RESPONDED I AM DONE HELPING YOU)


THESE PEOPLE HAVE SERIOUS PREJUDICE AGAINST POVERTY, SALLY SCHROER DOCUMENTS CB ARRIVED AT COURT HOUSE ON FOOT!!!!!!!!!!!! ALMOST THE ENTIRE TPR ORDER IS DISCUSSING FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AS A REASON FOR TERMINATION OF MOTHERS PARENTAL RIGHTS. NOTE NUMBER  30  AND 31 


(27) DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT WERE PROVIDED  FOR ALL THREE CHILDREN. THEY ARE ALL EXPERIENCING  SEVERE EMOTIONAL DAMAGE BY THE UNLAWFUL AND EXTREMELY ABUSIVE REMOVAL THAT WAS FOLLOWED UP WITH PARENTAL ALIENATION OF THE MOTHER. THAT HAS BEEN ON GOING WITH THE 100% FULL SUPPORT OF HEAD OF HUMAN SERVICE SUSAN RYNDA, SALLY SCHROER'S SUPERVISOR LOWELL FREEMAN, AND SALLY SCHROER. LATER THE SEVERE CHILD ABUSE OF THESE CHILDREN WOULD BE CONTINUED BY AN EQUALLY DANGEROUS WOMAN NAMED CARIE KRENIK..WITH THE SAME SUPPORT BEHIND HER AS SALLY SCHROER.

 BOTH BOYS DIAGNOSED WITH SEVERE EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THE COUNTIES EMOTIONALLY VIOLENT REMOVAL FROM THEIR MOTHER. PLUS BEING EXPOSED TO PEOPLE WHO JUSTIFY ABUSING THEM SO THEY CAN BE PARENTS.
IT WAS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CHILDREN PARTICIPATE IN CHILD PARENT  INTERACTION THERAPY OR IT WOULD CONTINUE TO GET WORSE.

(28 ) COUNTY ORDERED PARENT CHILD THERAPY WITH AMY NOAKES.  MOTHER PARTICIPATES 5 TIMES AND ON FEBRUARY 11, 2013 NOAKES SHOWS UP FOR AN APPOINTMENT AT THE HOME OF MOTHER AND MOTHER IS NOT THERE.

MOTHER IS NOT THERE BECAUSE AFTER MELISA AND TONY DOBMEIER TOLD SALLY SCHROER THEY WANT TO KEEP EUGENIE'S CHILDREN, SALLY SCHROER CUT MOTHERS RENTAL AND UTILITY ASSISTANCE FORCING HER IN TO HOMELESSNESS WITH ABSOLUTELY NO RESOURCES IN THE MIDDLE OF WINTER AND WHEN EUGENIE ASKED FOR HELP SALLY SCHROER PROFESSED SHE IS DONE HELPING HER. MOTHER HAS NO PLACE TO LIVE NO FOOD NO PHONE NO TRANSPORTATION. I BELIEVE THAT MAY BE WHY MOM WAS NOT HOME.

MS NOAKES ATTEMPTED TO CONTACT MOTHER BY PHONE THREE TIMES BUT MOTHER NEVER CONTACTED ANY ONE TO SCHEDULE ANY FURTHER APPOINTMENTS.

MOTHER HAS TROUBLE AFFORDING A PHONE AND IS STRUGGLING TO FIND A PLACE TO SLEEP EVERY DAY. SHE HAD NO FAMILY IN IN LE CENTER AND GETS DISPLACED TO FARIBAULT.

 ACCORDING TO # 24 OF THIS DOCUMENT; MOTHER WAS PROVIDED WITH A CASE MANAGER (SALLY SCHROER) AND ACCORDING TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA CHILD PROTECTION WORKER  HANDBOOK IT IS THE CASE MANAGERS JOB TO GET MOTHER TO AND FROM THESE APPOINTMENTS AND OR TO PROVIDE RENTAL ASSISTANCE TO PREVENT HOMELESSNESS IF APPOINTMENTS WERE TO TAKE PLACE IN THE HOME.

 IF THE APPOINTMENTS ARE TAKING PLACE IN MOTHERS HOME THEN THIS WOULD BE A PROBLEM BECAUSE SALLY SCHROER CUT THE MOTHERS RENTAL AND UTILITY ASSISTANCE WITHOUT INFORMING HER IN NOVEMBER. THE TIME FRAME IS CONSISTENT WITH THE FIRST ORDER PLACED BY TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER TO HAVE THE WORKER GET RID OF MOTHER SO THEY CAN KEEP HER CHILDREN PERMANENTLY.

CONSEQUENTLY HAD THE WORKER NOT BROKE SO MANY LAWS AND VIOLATED MOTHERS RIGHTS THE CHILDREN WOULD NOT NEED THERAPY FOR THE PSYCHOLOGICAL DAMAGE THE CHILD ABUSER SALLY SCHROER INTENTIONALLY P;UT THEM THROUGH.

 NOT ONCE BUT SEVERAL TIMES SHE ILLEGALLY ENTERED THE MOTHERS HOME WITH OUT PROBABLE CAUSE, EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES, CONSENT AND OR A PHYSICAL WARRANT SHE THEN TWICE ILLEGALLY INTERVIEWED CHILDREN ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WHICH IS PART OF THE SEARCH AND SEIZURE PROCESS THAT AGAIN REQUIRES  PROBABLE CAUSE, EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES, CONSENT AND OR A PHYSICAL WARRANT. NONE OF WHICH SHE HAD.

SALLY THEN ILLEGALLY SEIZED  CHILDREN  WITHOUT PROBABLE CAUSE, EXIGENT CIRCUMSTANCES, CONSENT AND OR A PHYSICAL WARRANT.

BECAUSE THE CHILDREN WERE NOT IN IMMINENT DANGER THE REQUIRES SERVICES TO BE OFFERED BEFORE REMOVAL.

ONCE SCHROER CUT HOUSING ANYTHING THAT CAUSES PROBLEMS AS A RESULT OF SALLY SCHROER FORCING SOMEONE WITH A DISABILITY OUT IN TO THE COLD IS GOING TO FALL UNDER REASONABLE EFFORT WAS NOT MET BY THE COUNTY

IN A NUT SHELL
TESTIFIED TO IN COURT AND Earlier IN THIS  DOCUMENT SEE (# 24 ) MOTHER IS GIVEN A CASE MANAGER TO HELP HER ORGANIZE AND COMPLETE THE CASE PLAN
SALLY SCHROER KNOWS WHERE MOTHER IS BECAUSE MOTHER CHECKS IN WITH HER REGULARLY. IT APPEARS AS THOUGH NOAKES IS COMMUNICATING WITH CASE MANAGER THAT SHE IS HAVING TROUBLE GETTING A HOLD OF MOTHER. CASE MANAGER HAS CONTACT WITH MOTHER. ANYONE ELSE SEE THE BREAKDOWN HERE.
 PLUS IF APPOINMENTS WERE TAKING PLACE IN MOTHERS HOME, SALLY SCHROER CUT THE ASSISTANCE FORCING MOTHER IN TO HOMELESSNESS


 DEFENSE ATTORNEY ASKS WHY SCHROER IS NOT DOING ANYTHING ABOUT GETTING MOTHER BACK IN TO THERAPY. SCHROER ADMITS SHE WAS ONLY FOCUSED ON MOTHERS THC USE WHICH ACCORDING TO TESTIMONY HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MALTREATMENT.

26.556

8) chronic and severe use of alcohol or a controlled substance by a parent or person responsible for the care of the child that adversely affects the child's basic needs and safety. There was never any maltreatment as a result of illegal or even legal chemical use.

  PSYCHOLOGISTS AND PARENT SPECIALISTS TESTIFY MALTREATMENT WAS THE RESULT OF MOTHERS OWN CHILDHOOD ABUSE. MOTHER DID NOT HAVE EXPOSURE TO A GOOD ROLE MODEL SETTING AGE APPROPRIATE STANDARDS. THIS RESULTED IN MOTHER HAVING UNREALISTIC EXPECTATIONS AS TO HOW OLD A CHILD CAN BE WHEN LEFT ALONE. 

WHEN A PROGRAM WAS AVAILABLE THAT COMBINED TREATMENT, THERAPY AND PARENTING CLASSES. SALLY SCHROER DOCUMENTS SHE WOULD NOT SEND CHILDREN AT LEAST 6 TIMES TO THE PARENTING PORTION OF THIS TREATMENT

SHE EVEN SAYS IN ONE REPORT MOTHER REALLY SHOT HERSELF IN THE FOOT BECAUSE I WILL NEVER SEND CHILDREN TO WELCOME MANOR. SCHROER SAYS SHE WILL NOT TAKE CHILDREN FROM THE DOBMEIER'S WHO PLACED AN ORDER TO KEEP EUGENIE'S CHILDREN IN LATE OCTOBER EARLY NOVEMBER. WHEN SCHROER TOLD MOTHER HER CHILDREN COULD NOT GO IT DID NOT MAKE SENSE FOR MOTHER TO GO BECAUSE THE PROGRAM WAS AN EXTENDED PROGRAM THAT WOULD HAVE PROLONGED THE AMOUNT OF TIME SHE WAS IN TREATMENT AND AWAY FROM HER CHILDREN.


 


(29) TESTING POSITIVE
THE JUDGE USES TWO TESTINGS IN ONE WEEK FOR A SINGULAR USE THAT WAS PRIOR TO CHIPS CASE AND CPS INVOLVEMENT. THC STAYS IN YOUR SYSTEM FOR WEEKS I BELIEVE.



 LISTS BOTH DATES AS TWO DIFFERENT USES. THIS IS ALSO DONE IN JANUARY FOR THC 2 DATES FOR A SINGULAR USE. THC STAYS IN YOUR SYSTEM FOR A LONG TIME AND THOSE TWO DATES IN ONE WEEK ARE CLOSE TOGETHER. SO THEY  WERE FROM  A ONE TIME USE.

 THEY ARE LISTING PAIN KILLERS FROM MOTHERS TEETH BEING PULLED. GETTING MOTHERS TEETH FIXED IS ON HER CASE PLAN. THE COUNTY WAS ALSO PROVIDED PROOF FROM THE DENTIST THAT THE PRESCRIPTION WAS MADE BY HER DENTIST TO HELP WITH PAIN AS A RESULT OF A PULLED TOOTH.  THERE IS ALSO AN EMAIL SENT BY EUGENIE TO HER CASE WORKER AND LAWYER INFOMING THEM BOTH, THAT A TOOTH WAS PULLED AND THAT A PAIN NMEDICATION WAS PRESCRIBED. EUGENIE'S TEETH WERE SO BAD SHE WAS IN THE DENTIST OFFICE 2-3 TIMES A WEEK BECAUSE SO MANY OF HER TEETH WERE INFECTED AND ABSESSING.

HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD ALLOW THEIR MOUTH TO BE INFECTED FOR THREE MONTHS TO COMPLETE AN OUT PATIENT TREATMENT? IT IS IN HER CASE PLAN TO GET TEETH FIXED. IT GOT TO THE POINT SHE WAS IN SO MUCH PAIN AND HER MOUTH WAS SWELLING THAT SHE DID NOT HAVE A CHOICE BUT TO GET HER TEETH FIXED

  THE COUNTY IS AWARE THAT SHE HAS A MOUTH FULL OF ROTTING TEETH. THEY SHOULD ALSO KNOW IF SOMEONE IS HAVEING TEETH PULLED THAT IT REQUIRES MEDICATION. SO IF A SECOND TREATMENT IS GOING TO CONFLICT WITH HER SEEKING TREATMENT FOR HER ROTTING TEETH THEN MAYBE HOLD OFF ON ANOTHER TREATMENT FACILITY BEING INVOLVED FOR A PHYSICALLY NON ADDICTIVE DRUG THAT PLAYED NO ROLE IN THE MALTREATMENT OF HER CHILDREN.

GETTING HER TEETH FIXED AND A PRESCRIBED MEDICATION WITH ANTIBIOTICS TO TREAT THE INFECTION IS NOTHING COMPARED TO PEOPLE BREAKING STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS TO REMOVE CHILDREN ILLEGALLY.

JUST SAYING.


TREATMENT PLAN WAS CONFLICTING WITH HER ABILITY TO MAINTAIN HER PHYSICAL HEALTH.
____________________________________________________________________
IN SUM UP TO THIS POINT UNHONERABLE JUDGE M.MICHAEL BAXTER HAS MALICIOUSLY PERJURED ALL BUT A FEW OF THE STATEMENTS. SHOWING  INTENT TO CAUSE THE MOTHER AND HER THREE CHILDREN  HARM  BY MEANS OF PROLONGED FORCED PAINFUL SEPARATION.

(30) LSCDHS ALSO PROVIDED MOTHER WITH TRANSPORTATION SERVICES  MOTHER WAS NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE HER OWN TRANSPORTATION FOR VISITS AT ANY POINT DURING THE CHIPS CASE. LSCDHS OR FOSTER PARENTS HAD TO DO IT. MOTHER ALSO RECEIVED TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR APPOINTMENTS FOR HER SELF AND FOR CHILDREN AND FOR COURT.

COUNTY  CUT RENTAL ASSISTANCE AND MOTHER IS DISPLACED TO ANOTHER TOWN. SO IT SEEMS LIKE THEY ARE BLAMING MOTHER FOR SOMETHING THEY DID..... HAD SHE REMAINED IN LE CENTER SHE COULD HAVE WALKED TO LOCAL ESTABLISHMENTS. ALSO ANITA BRACKEN OFFERED TO ASSIST WITH VISITATION TRANSPORTATION AND THE JUDGE SAID NO WE HAVE IT COVERED !!!!!!

FROM APRIL TO AUGUST ANITA BRACKEN PROVIDED TRANSPORTATION TO AND FROM COURT. ALSO TRANSPORTATION TO ALL APPOINTMENTS.

#31 IS THE ONE I CANNOT HELP BUT LAUGH AT BECAUSE UMMM HELLO JUDGE !!!!!

(31) PROVIDED  RENTAL AND UTILITY ASSISTANCE TO MAINTAIN STABLE HOME BUT SHE ULTIMATELY GOES HOMELESS

ANYONE ELSE SEE WHAT IS WRONG WITH THAT PHRASING????? HOW THE HELL DOES SOMEONE GO HOMELESS IF THEY ARE RECEIVING RENTAL AND UTILITY ASSISTANCE 


THEY DONT  


ABSENT FROM FINDING OF FACTS RENTAL ASSISTANCE IS CUT WHEN AN ORDER IS PLACED BY TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER WITH SALLY SCHROER TO KEEP EUGENIE HARRIS'S CHILDREN.  WHEN MOTHER ASKS FOR HELP FROM SCHROER WHO INTENTIONALLY CUT THE RENTAL SERVICE EUGENIE HARRIS IS TOLD DURING THE REUNIFICATION PERIOD I AM DONE HELPING YOU.


I AM DONE HELPING YOU DURING THE REUNIFICATION PERIOD
JUDGE M.MICHAEL BAXTER BELIEVES THAT A REASONABLE EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE BY THE COUNTY. 


WHAT IS ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATION?

The Minnesota Human Rights Act (Minn. Statutes, Chapter 363A), the state's comprehensive civil rights law, declares that certain types of differential treatment are unfair, discriminatory practices and against the law. The Act prohibits discrimination in employment, housing and real property, public accommodations, public services, education, credit services and business.
Not every act that is unfair or unreasonable is illegal. To be considered unlawful under the Human Rights Act, the discrimination must have happened because of one of the following reasons: race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, physical or mental disability, receipt of public assistance, age, family status (housing only), and Human Rights Commission activity (employment only). These personal characteristics are also called "protected classes."

(32) IS ABOUT MOTHERS LIVE IN BOYFRIEND AND MOTHER TESTIFIED IN COURT THAT HE WOULD NOT BE PARTICIPATING IN THE CHILDREN'S LIFE. SO NOT RELEVANT...

(33) SUPERVISED VISITATION DATE STARTED SEPT 24, 2012

(34) SUPERVISED VISITS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED TO MOTHER
 NOTE: CHILDREN SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN REMOVED UNDER STATE LAW FOR REASONABLE EFFORT,SERVICES HAVE TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO REMOVAL  COUNTY IS IN THE WRONG BY OFFERING SUPERVISED VISITS BECAUSE THE CHILDREN ARE BEING HELD IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW.

UPDATE IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE COUNTY VIOLATED FEDERAL LAW AS WELL WITH AN ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE. A CRYING BABY IS NOT PROBABLE CAUSE TO STICK YOUR HEAD IN SOMEONES HOME. INTERVIEWING THE FOUR YEAR OLD ON PRIVATE PROPERTY WITHOUT CONSENT OR A WARRANT IS ALSO CONSIDERED A SEARCH AND SEIZURE OF INFORMATION THAT REQUIRES CONSENT OR A WARRANT.  SO THE COUNTY WILL NOT BE ABLE TO USE ANYTHING FROM THEIR FINDINGS FROM THE HOME WHEN CHILDREN WERE ABDUCTED. THEY WILL ALSO BE CHARGED WITH A FEDERAL CRIME!!!

SINCE THAT TIME MOTHER HAS BEEN GENERALLY COMPLIANT WITH THESE VISITS BUT THERE HAVE BEEN A FEW ISSUES NOTED WITH MOTHERS PARTICIPATION IN VISITATION MOTHER AT TIMES ARRIVED LATE LEFT EARLY OR CANCELLED ALL TOGETHER. NOTE: JUDGE  OMITTED DETAILS FOR PURPOSE OF INTENT TO CAUSE EUGENIE HARRIS HARM. EUGENIE HARRIS  ALWAYS RESCHEDULED CANCELLED VISITS

SEE NUMBER #30
(30) LSCDHS ALSO PROVIDED MOTHER WITH TRANSPORTATION SERVICES  MOTHER WAS NOT ABLE TO PROVIDE HER OWN TRANSPORTATION FOR VISITS AT ANY POINT DURING THE CHIPS CASE. THE JUDGE ACTUALLY ESTABLISHES COUNTY IS REASON FOR LATE OR EARLY DISMISSAL OF VISITATION. 



NOTE: I HAVE DOCUMENTATION SHOWING THAT COUNTY WAS ONLY PARTIALLY COMPLIANT WITH VISITATION  SALLY SCHROER CANCELLING  VISITATION TO PUNISH MOTHER,CUTTING THEM SHORT, AND STARTING THEM LATE. ALSO DRIVERS SHOWING UP LATE. 




(35) MOTHER DOES NOT TAKE INITIATIVE IN PLANNING ACTIVITIES FOR CHILDREN
LSCDHS FREQUENTLY SUGGESTED OR PLANNED LOCATIONS FOR VISITS..IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING ACCORDING TO NUMBER 24 IN FINDING OF FACTS THAT MOTHER IS GIVEN A CASE MANAGER.

I have seen the case plan and if the county would have never cut rental assistance with the intent to get rid of the mother so they could give her children to a local childless couple RELATED TO THE LE SUEUR COUNTY ATTORNEY; then visits would have taken place in her home. see the break down here. I also read the visitation agreement and there is nothing in there telling her she should be doing this.MOTHER  has requested in court for visits to take place at Anita Bracken's residence because that is where she was staying. THAT WAS DENIED. MOTHER REQUESTED TO TAKE KIDS TO DAM DAYS IT WAS DENIED. SALLY SAID SHE DID NOT WANT THE CHILDREN TO LEAVE THE DOBMEIER=S OR THE COUNTY.

Anyway according to the state of Minnesota it is the social workers primary responsibility. Unless Le Sueur COUNTY is exempt from the state of Minnesota's guidelines.

IS IT JUST ME OR IS MOM GETTING BLAMED FOR NOT DOING THE CASE MANAGERS JOB?

Social workers have the primary responsibility to ensure that the visitation plan is developed, implemented and revised as needed. Afixed visitation schedule is best practice and has been related to more frequent visitation and fewer missed visits. Visitation is a purposeful, planned activity that will have a positive effect on a child’s need for safety, well-being and permanency.
The visitation plan:
■Honors a child’s existing bonds and attachments- 
SCHROER REFUSES TO SEND CHILDREN TO WELCOME MANOR WHICH WOULD HAVE REUNITED UNDER SUPERVISION ADDRESSED PARENTING EDUCATION THC USE ATTACHMENT IN CASE PLAN CHILDREN WOULD HAVE BEEN CARED FOR BY MOM EVERY DAY SCHROER DOES NOT WANT TO DISRUPT CHILDREN BEING WITH TONY AND MELISA DOBMEIER

 SHE INSTEAD SENT MOTHER TO A TREATMENT FACILITY THAT PUSHED VISITS TO 1 HOUR A WEEK AND HAD CHILDREN ON THE ROAD FOR 3 HOURS AND DRIVER WAS LATE FOR ALL BUT ONE OF THE ONE HOUR A WEEK VISITS 


CHANGED TO 4 HOURS A WEEK WITH ATTACHMENT IN CASE PLAN
 SCHROER ALSO TRIED TO SET UP A HALF WAY HOUSE OVER 6 HOURS AWAY FOR AN ADDITIONAL 6 MONTHS WHEN ANITA BRACKEN GOT WIND IT THREW A WRENCH IN SCHROERS PLANS,  SCHROER STILL HAD HER SENT TO A HALF WAY HOUSE FOR MARIJUANA USE BUT ONLY 10 MINUTES AWAY. 
  
■ Includes father and mother, siblings, and other relatives or kin who are significant to a child
-NO FAMILY ALLOWED IN PERSON OR ON PHONE 
■ Promotes the family’s individual strengths
COUNTY CANNOT IDENTIFY A SINGLE STRENGTH WHICH WAS MY FIRST INDICATOR THEY HAVE SOMEONE MANNAGING THE CASE WHO IS NOT CAPABLE OF DOING IT. THIS FAMILY CANT RECIEVE HELP FROM SOMEONE WHO IS ACTIVELY TELLING THE MOTHER I am done helping you and is prejudice against people in poverty.  WHEN SOMEONE IS SO BIAS THEY CANNOT FIND ONE STRENGTH YOU KNOW THE PERSON HELPING SHOULD BE REMOVED. That is why over 12 requests were made to have the county worker removed and over 12 requests were denied until the county worker was put up on the stand and looked like an idiot because of what she did.
■ Provides continuity of family relationships
NO FAMILY ALLOWED IN PERSON OR ON PHONE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF MR AND MRS DOBMEIER'S FAMILY. THE DOBMEIERS  STARTED MAKING THIS ABOUT THEM IMMEDIATELY BY CONFUSING THE CHILDREN ABOUT WHO THEY ARE RELATED TOO. THEY PLACED THE ORDER TO GET RID OF THE MOTHER. TONY DOBMEIER TELLS CHILDREN HIS MOTHERIS THEIR GRANDMOTHER THAT HIS SIBLINGS ARE AUNT AND UNCLES THEIR KIDS ARE THEIR COUSINS. TONY DOMEIER TELLS BABY TO CALL HIM DADDY !!! 


IT WAS THE SISTRER OF MRS DOBMEIER WHO TOLD A FOUR YEAR OLD WHO WAS MISSING HIS MOMMY THAT HE CANTR SEE HIS MOMMY BECAUSE SHE IS A CRACK HEAD. THE FOUR YEAR OLD IS TOLD BY MELISA DOBMEIER THAT THE PERSON RIPPING HIS MOTHER APART IS HIS AUNT.  
■ Involves the parent(s), child, and foster family in the
development and ongoing assessment of the plan
PARENTAL ALIENATION HAD FOSTER PARENTS DOING CHILD PARENT THERAPY ONLY GAVE MOM 4 HOURS A WEEK WITH NO OFFERED EDUCATION ACCORDING TO TESTIMONY. FOSTER PARENTS HAVE PLACED ORDER WITH SOCIAL WORKER AND JUDGE TO KEEP MOTHERS CHILDREN.  THERE IS NO INTERACTION OF FOSTER PARENTS AND MOTHER EXCEPT WHEN THEY SHOW UP IN COURT TO WATCH THE MOTHER GET SLAUGHTERED SO THEY CAN KEEP HER KIDS. 


ARE COMPLETELY ISOLATED FROM THE MOTHER NO INTERACTION. TPR EVEN STARTS OUT LIKE IT IS A PARENTING CONTEST BETWEEN MOTHER AND MENTALLY UNSTABLE DOBMEIERS 

■ Involves the family’s support system

FAMILY SUPPORT SYSTEM RECEIVED LETTERS FROM LAWYERS TELLING THEM THEY BETTER STAY AWAY WITH NUMEROUS THREATS WHEN THEY QUESTIONED COUNTY ABOUT SAFETY CONCERNS. SCHROER THREATENS ANITA BRACKEN IF SHE SHOWS UP TO A MEETING SHE LIE TO THE JUDGE AND SAY EUGENIE IS REFUSING TO WORK WITH social services AND SHE WILL LOSE HER KIDS. ANITA BRACKEN RESPOND TO THE THREAT SAYING IT IS UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT AND IT HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED AND SCHROER TELLS ANITA SHE IS GOING TO PRESS HARASSMENT CHARGES ON ANITA IN RESPONCE TO ANITA TELLING HER THAT HER INITIAL THREAT TO PERMANENTLY HARM THE MOTHER AND CHILD RELATIONSHIP IS UNACCEPTABLE AND MUST STOP. 


. THE ONLY PERSON NOT MAKING THREATS IS ANITA BRACKEN AND SALLY SCHROER THE CHILD PROTECTION WORKER HAS TWICE THREATENED TO HARM ANITA BRACKEN. EUGENIE AND HER CHILDREN IF SOMEONE SHOWS UP ON BEHALF OF THE MOTHER. 

■ Arranges visitation in the most home-like setting that will
maintain a child’s safety and existing attachments
 IRENE CHRISTENSON DID NOT WANT TO HAVE VISITATION IN HOME LIKE SETTING BECAUSE ANITA BRACKEN WAS DOCUMENTING THINGS 
THEY WERE HELD AT A PARK AT A LIBRARY AND A GYM. ONLY GIVING MOTHER 4 HOURS A WEEK TO BE A PARENT
■ Connects a child’s safety to the level of supervision
ACCORDING TO THE DIAGRAM MOTHERS REQUIRED  LEVEL IS MODERATE WITH AN EDUCATIONAL ASPECT.  THERE WAS ZERO EDUCATION OFFERED BY IRENE CHRISTENSON. TESTIFIED TO IN COURT. PLUS WHEN THE MOTHER HAD PARENT EDUCATION SET UP AT WELCOME MANOR SALLY SCHROER DID NOT WANT TO REDUCE THE TIME SPENT WITH TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER BY REUNITING CHILDREN WITH MOTHER SO SALLY DOCUMENTS 6 TIMES THAT SHE IS REFUSING TO SEND KIDS THIS WOULD HAVE BEEN IN A SUPERVISED ENVIROMENT 
  
■ Considers a child’s daily schedule, and the parent(s)’ work and/
or treatment obligations.

THERE WAS ALWAYS CONSIDERATION FOR THE DOBMEIERS AND THEIR SCHEDUEL WITH THE CHILDREN BUT NOT FOR THE MOTHER. 

THE NUMBER OF DRUG TREATMENT CLASSES MOTHER HAD TO TAKE PREVENTED HER FROM WORKING AND GOING TO SCHOOL. IN FACT SALLY SCHROER WAS GIVEN THE SCHEDULE FOR THE REQUIRED 3 AA CLASSES A WEEK PLUS MOTHERS 3 DAY A WEEK OUT PATIENT TREATMENT SCHEDULE. SCHROER OVER LAPPED THE VISITATIONS RESTRICTING EUGENIE FROM BEING ABLE TO ATTEND 1 OF THE REQUIRED 3 A WEEK AA MEETINGS. 

SENT EMAIL INFORMING LAWYER THAT SCHROER DID PREVENT MOTHER FROM ATTENDING ONE  OF THE THREE REQUIRED MEETINGS
■ Ensures that visitation frequency and settings are consistent,
and develop progressively towards a permanency goal

VISITATION WAS SET UP TO BE REDUCED SO THE CHILDREN WOULD BE WITH THE DOBMEIERS MORE THAN THE MOTHER. TONY AND MELISA WERE DOING THE PARENT CHILD THERAPY AND PERFORMING ALL PARENTING ROLES. 

■ Respects the family’s culture, faith and rituals
TONY AND MELISA DOBMEIER WHO PLACED AN ORDER TO HAVE THE MOTHER REMOVED SO THEY COULD KEEP HER CHILDREN DID GET THEIR CULTURE AND FAITH AND RITUALS MET. MOTHER WAS ISOLATED OUT

■ Ensures that parent(s) assist in daily decision making, and
participate in everyday activities as much as possible11

FOR TONY AND MELISA DOBMEIER THIS WAS CONSISTENT BUT NOT FOR THE MOTHER. 

MOTHER WAS NO NOT ALLOWED TO EVEN ATTEND HER SONS FAMILY DAY. MELISSA DOBMEIER DID THAT.  SALLY SCHROER TOLD TEACHERS THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO INCLUDE MOTHER IN ON SCHOOL INFORMATION SUCH AS SHE WOULD NOT GET SCHOOL CONFERENCES TO ATTEND. TONY AND MELISA DOBMEIER DID THAT. SHE WAS NOT GIVEN ORDER FORMS FOR SCHOOL PICTURES; THE LIST GOES ON. 


MOTHER WAS LEGALLY ENTITLED TO BE INVOLVED BUT WAS BLOCKED BY SALLY SCHROER THE TEACHERS COMPLIED. 


■ Increases contact and parents’ role toward reunification, or
THIS WAS DONE FOR TONY AND MELISA DOBMEIER THE TEMPORARY CARE GIVERS WHO PLACED AN ORDER TO KEEP THE CHILDREN.
when a child cannot return to parents’ care, continues family
relationships that preserves family and community connections.
FAMILY WAS ISOLATED OUT AT 6 MONTHS BECAUSE SALLY SCHROER WANTS THEM TO GO TO TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER. THAT IS WHY SHE CUT DENIED AND REFUSED SERVICES FOR MOM, WITH EVIDENCE OF TRYING TO KEEP MOTHER SENT AWAY TO RESTRICT HER TIME WITH KIDS.  FAMILY IS TOLD GET A LAWYER IF THEY DONT LIKE BEING FORCED OUT
TONY AND MELISSA DOBMEIER FAMILY CAN AND ALWAYS HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE WITH OUT BEING THREATENED LIKE ANITA BRACKEN WAS 


MOTHER RARELY UTILIZES THE TOY BOX
NOTE ACCORDING TO TESTIMONY IN COURT SHE IS MORE OF A HANDS ON KIND OF MOM WHEN SHE PLAYS WITH HER CHILDREN 







(36) ABOUT MOTHERS BOYFRIEND WHO DID NOT FOLLOW RECOMMENDATIONS SO THERE FOR MOTHER DECIDED HE WOULD NOT BE INVOLVED

(37) NOT ONLY ARE THE CHILDREN TAKEN AWAY BECAUSE MOM PREFERS HANDS ON PLAY VERSUS TOY BOX PLAY TOY BOX PLAY THERE ARE STILL SUPERVISION CONCERNS

(A) IS ABOUT MOTHERS BOYFRIEND AND NOT RELEVANT BECAUSE MOM AGREES KIDS FIRST SO HE WILL NOT BE INVOLVED.

(B) MOTHER ALLOWS BOYS TO MOVE OUT OF SIGHT AT PARK.

PROBLEM NUMBER ONE WITH COUNTY SUPERVISION CONCERNS
(B) IT WAS MADE CLEAR MOM REQUIRED EDUCATION TO CORRECT THE CONDITIONS. THAT WAS THE ONLY THING SHE NEEDED TO CORRECT THE CONDITIONS. THE CHILDREN DID NOT SUFFER FROM MALTREATMENT AS A RESULT OF MOM TESTING POSITIVE FOR THC. IT WAS ALWAYS AN EDUCATIONAL ISSUE. IN COURT IT IS REPEATED THROUGH OUT  FROM PERSON AFTER PERSON  MOTHER NEVER GETS ANY FORM OF EDUCATION. SO THE COUNTY SEEMS TO BE ADMITTING THEY FAILED TO MAKE A REASONABLE EFFORT.

EDUCATION SHOULD HAVE BEEN PART OF HER VISITATION REGIMENT BUT THE COUNTY FOCUSED ON REDUCED VISITS DESPITE THE ATTACHMENT ISSUE WITH THE BABY IN PLACES THAT WERE DIFFICULT FOR ANYONE PERSON TO TRY AND ENFORCE RULES.


. IT ALSO SHOULD HAVE TAKEN PLACE AT WELCOME MANOR  OR IN A HOME LIKE SETTING BUT SCHROER DENIED TO PROVIDE THE CHILDREN FOR THOSE SERVICES. IRENE CHRISTENSON DID NOT WANT TO HAVE VISITS IN HER HOME. SCHROER SHOULD HAVE RESPONDED TO THE NUMEROUS EMAIL REQUESTS ASKING FOR PARENT EDUCATION RESOURCES HOWEVER SHE WAS NEGLIGENT TO RESPOND.


GAL, VISITATION SUPERVISOR, PARENTING SPECIALIST, AND SOCIAL WORKER/CASE MANAGER SALLY SCHROER  ALL SAY COUNTY DOES NOTHING TO HELP MOM WITH THE ONE THING THAT WAS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THE MALTREATMENT AND THAT IS EDUCATION ON COGNITIVE SKILLS FOR HER CHILDREN.

IT WAS ALSO DETERMINED IN COURT THAT SALLY SCHROER WOULD ASK IRENE WHO WRITES THIS DOCUMENTATION TO ALTER DOCUMENTATION.

MOTHER WAS NOT ABLE TO HAVE ANYONE PRESENT FOR HER OWN REPRESENTATION, IN VIOLATION OF HER RIGHTS. THE COUNTY HAS A ONE SIDED VERSION OF EVENTS AND THE COUNTY HAS CONTINUED TO PRESENT FALSE BLAME PERJURED FACTS FROM THE BEGINNING OF THE FIST ORDER BEING PLACED BY MELISSA AND TONY DOBMEIER TO KEEP EUGENIE'S CHILDREN.

 FOR EXAMPLE MOTHER CANCELS VISITS (LEAVE OUT MOTHER RESCHEDULES). INTENTIONAL ISOLATION SO ONLY A COUNTY WORKER IS PRESENT.

WHEN A CONCERN IS EXPRESSED ABOUT MOTHER ONLY HAVING A COUNTY REPRESENTATIVE BASED ON PROOF THAT COUNTY WORKERS WERE FALSIFYING THEIR DOCUMENTATION  DEMONSTRATING PROOF THAT THEY WERE INTENTIONALLY TRYING TO HARM THIS FAMILY TO FILL AN ORDER FOR CHILDREN PLACED BY THE LE SUEUR COUNTY ATTORNEYS CHILDLESS  FAMILY MEMBERS.


THE FAMILY IS TOLD IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT GET A LAWYER AND FIGHT ME... "CARIE KRENIK-CHILD PROTECTION WORKER" PAID WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS.

IT WAS ALSO DETERMINED THAT SALLY SCHROER WOULD EDIT STUFF OUT OF THE DOCUMENTATION IF SHE DID NOT WANT THE MOTHER TO SEE SOMETHING.

ON A 3RD OCCASION IRENE CHRISTENSON'S ACCOUNT WAS FALSE WHEN COMPARED TO THE VERSION OF EVENTS OF THE 4 OTHER ADULTS IN THE ROOM.

(38) ON OCTOBER 11 2012 MOTHER MEETS THE CRITERIA FOR MARIJUANA DEPENDENCE IT WAS RECOMMENDED FOR MOTHER TO COMPLETE OUT PATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAM IN 45 DAYS MOTHER DID NOT FOLLOW THROUGH.

NOTE: MOTHER DID COMPLETE INPATIENT TREATMENT THERAPY WHICH MAKES NUMBER 38 NOT RELEVANT.

WHAT IS RELEVANT IS THAT PARENTING CLASSES, PARENT CHILD THERAPY AND ATTACHMENT FOR BABY, KEEPING MOTHER INVOLVED IN OLDEST SONS EDUCATION  WAS ALSO RECOMMENDED AND IN CASE PLAN AND NONE OF THOSE ARE FOLLOWED THROUGH ON BY THE SOCIAL WORKER.WHERE AS MOTHER DOES FOLLOW THROUGH.

(39) FOLLOWING MOTHERS ARREST "ABSENT FROM FINDING OF FACTS MOTHERS ARREST WAS FOR BEING LOUD IN HER APARTMENT."  AND TRANSPORT TO DETOX SHE WAS GIVEN A SECOND CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY ASSESSMENT ON JANUARY 25 2013 MOTHER MET THE CRITERIA FOR THE EXISTING CANNABIS AND NOW ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE.

MOM WAS AT HOME SALLY SCHROER CALLED AND CANCELLED HER VISIT AND SHE SNAPS AND CHUGS SOME ALCOHOL. THE COP GETS REPORT  AND INVESTIGATES TO SEE WHY SOMEONE IS BEING LOUD IN HER HOME.  THE POLICE OFFICER CHARGES HER WITH DISORDERLY CONDUCT AND TAKES HER TO DETOX.

AS AN OUTSIDER LOOKING IN I AM SEEING A EMOTIONAL BREAKDOWN. 

THE COUNTY IDIOTS TACK ON A NEW ADDICTION. EVEN THOUGH SHE HAS NO CONTACT WITH ALCOHOL FROM SEPTEMBER 2012 TO JANUARY 2013? GEE WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE TO ME FROM AN OBSERVERS POINT OF VIEW AND BEING VERY FAMILIAR WITH WHAT CAN HAPPEN AS A RESULT OF BEING ABUSED. I SEE A TRAUMA SURVIVOR EXPERIENCING A BREAK DOWN. A PERSON WHO FEELS HELPLESS AND DEFEATED.

IT IS A VERY COMMON EVENT FOR VICTIMS OF EMOTIONAL VIOLENCE LIKE MOTHER IS GOING THROUGH WHILE BEING ABUSED BY SALLY SCHROER, TO SNAP
IT IS EVEN MORE COMMON FOR SOMEONE WITH C-PTSD TO SNAP. THESE PEOPLE BROKE LAWS TO TAKE HER KIDS AND ARE CONSTANTLY TELLING HER SHE WILL NEVER GET THEM BACK. THEY HAVE FOUND THEM NEW PARENTS. THE SOCIAL WORKER COMMITS PERJURY VIOLATE MOTHER'S CIVIL AND STATE LEGAL RIGHTS TO TAKE THE ONE AND ONLY THING SHE WOULD DIE FOR AND THAT IS HER KIDS.

OF COURSE SHE WILL SNAP YOU MORONS!

 A PERSON WHO WAS NEVER TORTURED IN CAPTIVITY WOULD HAVE SNAPPED EXPERIENCING THAT MUCH ABUSE.

IT IS ALSO VERY PREDICABLE FOR THE ABUSER TO BLAME THE VICTIM FOR THE EVOKED RESPONSE TO THE EMOTIONAL VIOLENCE. I WOULD SAY BLAMING THE VICTIM MAY BE REPRESENTED HERE IN TACKING ON AN ADDITIONAL ADDICTION AND SHIPPING HER OFF TO A IN PATIENT TREATMENT CENTER WHERE ALCOHOL IS RULED OUT AS AN ADDICTION.

WHAT A BUNCH OF MORONS! YOU HAVE NO DAMN PROOF SHE IS ADDICTED TO MARIJUANA EITHER.THERE IS NO EVIDENCE. 

BAXTER, DID YA EVER THINK ABOUT SHOWING YOUR NASTY SICK SADISTIC  FRIENDS HOW TO GET IN CONTACT WITH AN ADOPTION AGENCY!!!

(40) LSCDHS ARRANGES FOR MOTHER TO GO TO NEW BEGINNINGS IN WAVERLY BUT MOTHER CHOSE NOT TO TAKE THE TREATMENT BECAUSE SHE WANTED TO GO TO ONE CLOSER.

NOTE WAVERLY IS .58.64 miles 1 hour 23 mins AWAY FROM HOME. I WONDER HOW THEY ARE GOING TO MANAGE FREQUENT VISITS FOR THE BABY, WHO IS IN DANGER OF ATTACHMENT DISORDER.ALSO KEEP MOTHER INVOLVED IN HER SONS SCHOOLING


(41) ON FEBRUARY 14 2013 MOTHER ENTERED THE RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PROGRAM AT CARE IN ST PETER BECAUSE COUNTY WORKER SALLY SCHROER BEAT HER SO BADLY THAT SHE EXPERIENCED A BREAK DOWN. MOTHER LEFT THE FACILITY AND WAS UNSUCCESSFULLY DISCHARGED AGAINST STAFF ADVICE 10 DAYS LATER.

SALLY SCHROER BROUGHT THE CHILDREN TO SEE MOM ON THE DAY MOTHER CHECKED OUT IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THEY HAVE A RECORDING ON A CAMERZA OF SALLY SCHROER TELLING THE MOTHER THE TRAUMA SURVIVOR IN FRONT OF HER BABIES; LOOK WHERE YOU ARE YOU ARE, YOU ARE NO KIND OF MOTHER. I AM MORE OF A MOTHER TO YOUR CHILDREN THEN YOU ARE.  MOM CHECKED OUT AFTER THE VISIT.IN FRONT OF HER THREE CHILDREN.

(42) MOTHER WAS DOING WELL PRIOR TO LEAVING HOWEVER GIVEN A POOR PROGNOSIS FOR LEAVING AFTER SALLY SCHROER EMOTIONALLY ABUSED HER FOR HAVING SYMPTOMS OF COMPLEX POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER  AFTER SALLY TOOK HER CHILDREN FROM HER IN VIOLATION OF THE LAW.

IT SOUNDS LIKE MOTHER IS HAVING ANOTHER BREAKDOWN AFTER BEING AROUND SOMEONE WHO IS USING EMOTIONAL VIOLENCE ON SOMEONE WHO WAS TORTURED IN CAPTIVITY


(43) MOTHER IS SCHEDULED FOR ANOTHER CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY EVALUATION ON MARCH 12, 2013 A BED IS RESERVED FOR MOTHER AT WELCOME MANOR. MOTHER IS A NO SHOW AND HER RESERVED BED IS GIVEN AWAY

ACTUALLY ANITA BRACKEN SPOKE TO WELCOME MANOR ON APRIL 9 AND ACCORDING TO WELCOME MANOR BEDS FOR MOTHER AND HER THREE CHILDREN WERE RESERVED SO BEDS FOR CHILDREN AND MOTHER ARE GIVEN AWAY. FINDING OF FACTS SAY ONLY A BED FOR MOTHER IS RESERVED.

SALLY SCHROER DOCUMENTS IN CHRONOLOGY REPORT SHE TOLD MOTHER SHE WILL NOT BE SENDING CHILDREN; SHE HEARD THEY DO NOT HAVE ROOM FOR KIDS. SALLY NOTES  GENIE DOES NOT SEEM SURPRISED THAT SALLY IS IS NOT WILLING TO REUNITE THE MOTHER WITH HER CHILDREN. GENIE IS THE ONE WHO MADE THE ARRANGEMENTS AND KNOWS SALLY SCHROER IS TELLING A LIE. ANITA BRACKEN RECEIVED CONFIRMATION THAT SCHROER LIED DIRECTLY FROM WELCOME MANOR

SCHROER DOCUMENTS MOTHER WAS A NO SHOW FOR WELCOME MANOR WHERE HER KIDS COULD ULTIMATELY JOIN HER. ALLOWING THE READER TO BELIEVE MOTHER HAD OPPORTUNITY TO BE REUNITED WITH CHILDREN AND DID NOT SHOW UP. 

SCHROER ALSO DOCUMENTS LYING TO ANITA BRACKEN SAYING SHE TOLD ANITA THE CHILDREN COULD JOIN HER SO THAT ANITA WOULD BELIEVE GENIE WAS THE LIAR. EXCEPT SCHROER DOCUMENTS AROUND 6 TIMES HOW SHE REFUSES TO REUNITE CHILDREN WITH THE MOTHER SO WELCOME MANOR COULD PROVIDE THE FAMILY WITH THE REQUIRED EDUCATION TO REUNITE THEM. SHE DOES NOT WANT TO INTERRUPT THE BONDING PROCESS WITH PEOPLE WHO HAVE PLACED AN ORDER FOR THE CHILDREN TONY AND MELISA DOBMEIER.

ALSO NOT MENTIONED WELCOME MANOR IS AN EXTENDED PROGRAM THAT WILL KEEP MOM AWAY LONGER FROM CHILDREN THAN A PROGRAM THAT DOES NOT ALLOW THE CHILDREN TO JOIN HER.

(44) ON MARCH 19 2013 MOTHER COMPLETED A THIRD CHEMICAL DEPENDENCY ASSESSMENT MOTHER CONTINUED TO MEET CRITERIA FOR CANNABIS DEPENDENCE AND ALCOHOL ABUSE AND IT WAS AGAIN RECOMMENDED THAT MOTHER ENTER AND COMPLETE A RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PROGRAM.

(45) ON APRIL 11 2013 MOTHER WAS ADMITTED TO A RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT PROGRAM AT FOUNTAIN CENTERS IN ALBERT LEA. MOTHER APPEARED TO BENEFIT FROM TREATMENT AND WAS DOING WELL.

WHAT IS DIFFERENT THIS TIME IS MOTHER IS GETTING HELP DEALING WITH SALLY SCHROER. FOUNTAIN CENTERS IS AWARE THAT SCHROER IS ABUSING MOTHER AND ARE RECORDED SAYING IT IN SEVERAL CONVERSATIONS WITH FAMILY. ANITA BRACKEN IS DOCUMENTING AND ADDRESSING EVERYTHING SALLY SCHROER DOES TO HARM MOTHER. THIS HOLDS SALLY SCHROER AT BAY AND MOTHER DOES COMPLETE INPATIENT TREATMENT FOR THE PHYSICALLY NON ADDICTIVE DRUG MARIJUANA.

(46) ON MAY 5, 2013  MOTHER WAS SUCCESSFULLY DISCHARGED  WITH THE CONDITION THAT SHE GO TO WEST HILLS LODGE, A HALF WAY HOUSE PROGRAM. STAFF AT FOUNTAIN CENTERS TESTIFIED THAT CONTINUING AFTER CARE AND ATTENDING  A HALFWAY HOUSE TYPE PROGRAM WAS IMPORTANT FOR MOTHER BECAUSE SHE HAD NOT YET DEVELOPED ALL THE SKILLS NECESSARY TO SUCCEED IN MAINTAINING SOBRIETY. MOTHER NEEDED TO LEARN THE 12 STEPS PROCESS, DEVELOP HEALTHY COPING AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS, OBTAIN A SPONSOR AND DEVELOP A SOBER SUPPORT NETWORK.

SALLY SCHROER HAS BEEN ACTIVELY LOOKING FOR A HALFWAY HOUSE MORE THAN SIX HOURS A WAY FROM MOTHERS CHILDREN. FOR AN ADDITIONAL 6 MONTHS. MOTHER CALLS ANITA BRACKEN UPSET. ANITA CALLS LOWELL FREEMAN WHO TELLS ANITA BRACKEN SALLY SCHROER HAS NO BUSINESS PRESCRIBING FOLLOW UP CARE FOR MOTHER. LOWELL FREEMAN CALLS FOUNTAIN CENTERS AND TELLS FOUNTAIN CENTERS THAT THEY ARE IN CHARGE OF PRESCRIBING FOLLOWUP CARE. ANITA BRACKEN SENDS A LETTER TO MOTHERS ATTORNEY SAYING THAT SHE DOES NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT IS GOING ON BECAUSE SALLY SCHROER REFUSED TO SEND CHILDREN TO WELCOME MANOR AN EXTENDED PROGRAM WHICH WAS NOT REASONABLE BASED ON THE LENGTH OF TIME IT WOULD KEEP HER SEPARATED FROM HER CHILDREN. NOW SHE IS TRYING TO SEND HER 6 HOURS AWAY... FOR AN ADDITIONAL 6 MONTHS ENDANGERING THE BABY PUTTING HER AT HIGH RISK FOR ATTACHMENT DISORDER.

MOTHER MIGHT NOT HAVE ACQUIRED ALL THE SKILLS BECAUSE SHE HAS COMPLEX POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER AS A RESULT OF BEING TORTURED IN CAPTIVITY. WHEN MOTHER IS BEING TERRORIZED LIKE SALLY SCHROER IS DOING TO HER SHE WILL HAVE IMPAIRED THINKING DURING TIMES OF HELPLESSNESS AND THREATS OF NEVER SEEING HER KIDS AGAIN ARE HAPPENING TO HER. ANITA MENTIONS THAT SALLY CAUSES HER TO BREAK DOWN THERE IS A PATTERN SO MAYBE IF I AM WITH HER IT WILL HELP KEEP HER EMOTIONS FROM GOING ALL OVER THE PLACE. THAT WAS WHEN THE COUNTY FREAKED OUT AND ANITA BRACKEN STARTED RECEIVING THREATS AND WAS BANNED FROM SPEAKING WITH ANYONE.



(47) MOTHERS PROGNOSIS AT THE TIME OF DISCHARGE IS POOR BUT IT WAS NOTED THIS COULD BE UPDATED   IF MOTHER FOLLOWED THE CONTINUING CARE RECOMMENDATIONS. MOTHER  REDUCED HER SEVERITY RATING BUT WAS ONLY IN THE PRECONTEMPLATION STAGE FOR CHANGE.

MOTHER WOULD NEED TO SEPARATE FROM THE PEOPLE ABUSING HER SALLY SCHROER BUT SHE COULD NOT SHE MADE OVER 20 REQUESTS FOR SOMEONE WHO IS NOT ABUSIVE AND WAS NOT DONE HELPING HER BACK IN NOVEMBER. MOTHER ALSO HAS COMPLEX POST TRAUMATIC STRESS SYNDROME AND NOT A DRUG ADDICTION AND SHE IS RESPONDING TO THE ILLEGAL REMOVAL OF HER CHILDREN AND MISSING THEM. 

(48) MOTHER WAS ADMITTED TO THE HALFWAY HOUSE PROGRAM AT WESTHILLS LODGE IN NORTHFIELD ON MAY 6 2013. AFTER THREE DAYS MOTHER WAS ASKED TO LEAVE THE PROGRAM AT STAFF REQUEST AND WAS UNSUCCESSFULLY DISCHARGED ON MAY 8 2013 THIS IN EFFECT WAS ANOTHER UNSUCCESSFUL TREATMENT PROCESS FOR MOTHER.

MOTHER SPENT THE FIRST DAY UNPACKING SHE SPENT THE 2ND DAY TRYING TO LEARN THE ROUTINE. SHE WAS THROWN OUT IN THE MIDDLE OF HER 3RD DAY BUT HAD ONLY BEEN THERE FOR ONE FULL DAY TO LEARN THE ROUTINE. 



(49) MS JODY ANDERSON PROGRAM DIRECTOR TESTIFIED THAT MOTHER DID NOT WANT TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROGRAM  AND HAD A BAD ATTITUDE. MOTHER WAS NEGATIVE TOWARD HER PEERS AND STAFF. MOTHER FELT SHE HAD BEEN TRICKED AND FORCED TO BE THERE. MOTHER LEFT GROUP EARLY REFUSED TO COMPLETE ASSIGNMENT AND BROKE PROGRAM RULES.

JODY IS CORRECT MOTHER DID NOT. SHE JUST FINISHED INPATIENT TREATMENT PROGRAM

Mother just completed inpatient drug treatment for marijuana which is ranked lower than caffeine and nicotine in terms of being dangerous. with a false charge of alcohol addiction when mother had a breakdown AS A RESULT OF SALLY SCHROER BREAKING LAWS TO FIRST TAKE HER KIDS AND BREAKING LAWS TO MAKE SURE SHE DOES NOT GET THEM BACK. SALLY USES TECHNIQUES LIKE NOT SENDING HER CHILDREN TO WSELCOME MANOR FORCING MOM TO GO TO A SHORTER PROGRAM THAT REDUCES VISITS TO AN HOUR A WEEK. SALLY SCHROER FOUND A HALF WAY HOUSE 6 HOURS AWAY WITH A 6 MONTH EXTENDED TREATMENT TIME TO KEEP MOTHER AWAY FROM HER KIDS.

THE JUDGE THOUGHT IT WAS MESSED UP SHE WAS IN A HALFWAY HOUSE WHEN METH USERS DON'T GET PLACED IN HALFWAY THEIR FIRST TIME OUT OF TREATMENT.

HENCE EVERYONE KNOWS THIS IS THE RESULT OF SALLY SCHROER MANIPULATING DRUG COUNSELORS.  

SALLY SCHROER CONTACTS WEST HILLS LODGE AND TELLS THEM IF EUGENIE HAS ANITA BRACKEN AROUND I CANT WORK WITH EUGENIE. SHE ALSO EMAILS THE DRUG COUNSELORS SAYING THAT SINCE ANITA BRACKEN HAS BEEN INVOLVED I FEAR IT HAS CAUSED EUGENIE TO FALL BACK IN HER TREATMENT.

WE KNOW EUGENIE NEVER COMPLETES TREATMENT UNTIL ANITA BRACKEN IS INVOLVED AND SALLY HAD BEEN AROUND FOR 6 -8 MONTHS ANITA STEPS IN TREATS HER LIKE A HUMAN BEING AND THINGS CHANGE FOR THE BETTER BUT NOT FOR THE DOBMEIER/S WHO WANT HER CHILDREN AT ALL COSTS. EVEN IF IT TORMENTS THE CHILDREN....


(50) STAFF ATTEMPTED  TO ADDRESS CONCERNS ABOUT HER BEHAVIOR, ATTITUDE, AND COMMITMENT BY GOING OVER  A BEHAVIOR CONTRACT WHICH MOTHER SIGNED. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT MOTHER WAS NO AMENABLE TO TREATMENT AND WAS DISCHARGED FROM PROGRAM.

mothers attitude has to do with wanting to get back to her children. With constant game playing by the county IS UPSETTING THE TRAUMA SURVIVOR. THE child protection worker  HAS CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED THAT SHE  SHE IS  more violent then Eugenie's boyfriend. Eugenie said she was willing to try if they could just let her know when she would start experiencing symptoms of EMOTIONAL DIS REGULATION WHICH IS A SYMPTOM OF being sexually and physically abused in captivity AS A CHILD, AND RE-TRAUMATIZED BY SALLY SCHROER WHO HAS REPEATEDLY VIOLATED AND VERBALLY ABUSED HER WITH THREATS TO HER CHILDREN.  EUGENIE she would try to work on them. The halfwayhouse also does not know Eugenie Harris is a

(51) MOTHER WENT UP IN SEVERITY LEVEL AT DISCHARGE, MOTHER LACKED WILLINGNESS TO CHANGE SHE ALSO LACKED SOBER SUPPORT NETWORKS AND HAD NOT YET DEVELOPED HABITS THAT SUPPORT RECOVERY.

MOTHER IS ACTUALLY SUFFERING FROM HER EARLIER ABUSE IN CAPTIVITY AND HER CURRENT ABUSE IN CAPTIVITY AND SHE IS SHOWING SYMPTOMS OF IT. SHE IS UNABLE TO WALK AWAY FROM HER CHILDREN.