Monday, September 2, 2013

2012 Minnesota Statutes/Child Trafficking

  • WHATEVER YOU THINK OF FOSTER CARE AND ADOPTION, 

    KEEP IN MIND THAT IT SHOULD BE ABOUT FINDING A HOME 

    FOR A CHILD WHO NEEDS ONE RATHER THAN ABOUT FINDING

     A CHILD FOR A FAMILY THAT WANTS ONE. WHEN THOSE TWO 

    SITUATIONS COINCIDE, ADOPTION IS A WONDERFUL OPTION. 

    BUT WHEN AN EXISTING FAMILY IS TORN APART NEEDLESSLY 

     IN ORDER TO CREATE AN ADOPTIVE FAMILY, IT’S CRUEL.









Children taken from a low income family being bought and sold for government funding to a local Le Center childless couple related to County Attorney. The childless couple placed an order to have the judge take my mommy away so they could keep us.



Tomorrow the judge must give the ruling on whether he terminates moms rights from her children. In which case there will be an appeal filed in a higher court. A court where lawyers do not hide being related to the foster people who placed orders to have the mother unnecessarily stripped of her children so they can be parents to them.  Also lawyers who are former employees and friends with the child abusers/county worker Sally Schroer/Carie Krenik.


The court failed to determine if a reasonable effort was made by the RESPONSIBLE? social services agency under subdivision 260C.212 CHILDREN IN PLACEMENT.

proof of services offered to prevent removing the children in the first place.
proof of how those services failed.

 proof of what services they offered to correct conditions that led to the removal in the first place so the parent and child could be reunited.

According to parent time specialist mom requires parent education on  age appropriate safety. These are the conditions that led to the removal. Recommendations are  parent mentor or parent supervisor education.

Mom tested positive for THC which is from marijuana. NO marijuana or drug paraphernalia is in the home, mom is not high at the time the children are taken. The children were found to be clean, have plenty of healthy food, clean clothes, and were in a baby proofed clean apartment. Mom is zero risk to abuse and VERY loving and nurturing. She struggles with discipline because of her own abuse and needs education on positive discipline.

proof that Sally Schroer refused to send the children to the parenting education classes and healthy relationship skill building portion of treatment. or that some type of parenting education was offered to the parent and not the foster parents.

work on attachment with baby - children were abused by case worker by means of parental alienation.

Proof of services requested by the parent  if any what they were and why they were denied and the county will have to provide an explanation using clear concise evidence 

Mom requested the children be sent to welcome manor and Schroer documents that the mother really shot herself in the foot  when she left the last place because she will never send the kids. Lowell freeman Sally Schroers supervisor explains that Le Sueur County has always worked with the center to send the children and that service is never denied. There is a documented phone call to welcome manor with Witnesses listening on speaker that heard confirmation for reservations for the mother and three children to join her for the parenting portion the center offered. Sally Schroer documents that she refuses to send children and the excuse she made up was she heard they do not have room for kids.

parenting classes are requested social worker negligent to respond

job training/job search classes requested social worker negligent to respond

housing resources requested in February 2 prevent homelessness social worker responded I am done helping you and documents it is a good thing when mother goes homeless in February.
The second time the caseworker was  negligent to respond and blocked email correspondence shortly after

Transfer of custody Carie Krenik refuses to hear why parent thinks it is in the best interest of the child on July 23. then has lawyer draft letter insisting she is only going to support termination. With supporting evidence mom is not abusive and only needs a parenting class. Termination would be to reparent the children to the childless couple.

Request for new caseworker because the one she had was abusive and selling her children to the county attorney's cousins denied

Request to have family involved with visitation and it was denied by Carie Krenik

Request to have family Supervise visits denied

Request to have children moved with family member to be closer to mom denied

Request to allow children to talk to out of state grandma denied



They will need to provide proof of the mother assisting in creating the case plan
Sally Schroer wrote case plan as did Carie Krenik without assistance from the parent. They merely went over the case plan with the mother to sign. Judge had order case plan to be signed by the mother because she refused to sign something she did not help create.

That social services kept the child in close proximity of the parent- 
Schroer refused to help when mom went homeless displacing her to another town.
Proof of Schroer refusing to send the children to welcome manor
Proof that the county actively refused without consideration to place with family member closer in proximity to the mother.
documented proof that Schroer told mother I will not allow children to leave county
Proof that Sally Schroer tried to send the mother away for 6 months over 6 hours away. AB intervened

Subd. 8.Findings regarding reasonable efforts.


In any proceeding under this section, the court shall make specific findings:


(1) that reasonable efforts to finalize the permanency plan to reunify the child and the parent were made including individualized and explicit findings regarding the nature and extent of efforts made by the social services agency to rehabilitate the parent and reunite the family