Wednesday, August 28, 2013

UP DATE ON CARIE KRENIK

  • WHATEVER YOU THINK OF FOSTER CARE AND ADOPTION, 

    KEEP IN MIND THAT IT SHOULD BE ABOUT FINDING A HOME 

    FOR A CHILD WHO NEEDS ONE RATHER THAN ABOUT FINDING

     A CHILD FOR A FAMILY THAT WANTS ONE. WHEN THOSE TWO 

    SITUATIONS COINCIDE, ADOPTION IS A WONDERFUL OPTION. 

    BUT WHEN AN EXISTING FAMILY IS TORN APART NEEDLESSLY

     IN ORDER TO CREATE AN ADOPTIVE FAMILY, IT’S CRUEL.




DON'T GIVE UP HOPE BABIES YOUR MOMMY WILL NEVER STOP FIGHTING.  MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT HAS BEEN ACTIVELY REPRIMANDING THE PEOPLE INVOLVED IN LAWLESS ABDUCTIONS TO GET CHILDREN OUT OF THE CARE OF DANGEROUS PEOPLE LIKE CHILD PROTECTION WORKERS WORKING WITH GALS AND COUNTY ATTORNEYS AND JUDGES AND HEAD OF HUMAN SERVICES.

This week, Minnesota’s State Court of Appeals sent a strong message of support to abused children trapped in the system when it overturned Caroline Rice’s convictions on three counts of deprivation of parental rights.

NOTE: As I have pointed out this article recognises ANY unnecessary separation of the parent and child as abuse to the child!!!!!!!!! it is also abuse to the parent because it forces the parent into a victim position. A social worker like Sally Schroer will do this job for a lifetime because of her own self esteem issues. The job allows her to abuse people who have been victims most of their life. They are people who struggle as adults because of their childhood. Sally is the equivalent to the school yard bully She thrives on control and she thrives on judging the struggles of former abuse victims because seeing the people who are screw ups also boosts her ego. Her paper work is full of materialistic judgement and lies.   

 In the case of State v. Rice, the Appellate Court decided that the reason why Caroline’s convictions were illegitimate was that Judge Perkins and the State’s prosecutor had engaged in various forms of misconduct during trial that violated Caroline’s civil rights and deprived her of a fair hearing.


I just got off a phone call where I was allowed to listen in on the other end. AB has been telling me what it has been like dealing with this county and she allows me to listen in.Honestly I was just like AB at first. I struggled to believe these people were in a job position that would allow them to hurt someone.

 Carie Krenik the new county worker  was on one end AB and I were on the other.  I have this conversation recorded. The worker turned pure evil as soon as she realized that it was AB on the phone? AB asked her for a detailed reason why she cannot see the children. ONE would think if children are being placed in the hands of theses people they should be required to have a reason for the decisions they make for the children in their charge. If they don't then I have every reason to question the safety and well being of the children being placed in their authority.

State guideline have no room for unexplainable reasoning.


Carie explains that she did not call AB back because she told her why she cannot see the children. AB  explains no you did not. Carie replies yes I did ; County Officials and I all agree that the visits are with just mom. Why is that AB asked, Carie said we all agree, agree on what? they just all agree she said.

So there is no safety reason ? So maybe they are isolated with just mom because Minnesota policy also wants visitation to be productive working toward reunification for example a parent who may require education will have visits structured to provide that education. However that is not the case. In court it was concluded that though the county took the kids because mom required education to correct conditions, Le Sueur has not offered the mother any education to correct conditions.

So basicly Carie and anyone else involved who agreed to this isolation and restricted time frame is participating in alienating the children from the people in their lives. Minnesota state guidelines also require family to be involved. There would be some level of discrimination going on if they had no explanation for this.

The County officials Carie  is referring to have all participated in breaking laws, for example The GAL Guardian Ad Litem Rose Valdez as mentioned before; has perjured herself twice in court. She should be conducting her investigation independently, however appears to be besties with the child protection worker and even makes statements like I support social services. She goes to lunch with Sally Schroer.Then there is Sally Schroer who was violating the laws and fair treatment  rights of a trauma survivor ((the mother ))to broker out her children. There is also documented proof Sally Schroer abused a 5, 4 and 1 year old by means of parental alienation.

I think Carie Krenik  is referring to the same county officials related to the foster people who willfully hid conflict of interest to terminate the mother's rights while entertaining her children in their home for the week end for example Brent Chritian the Le Sueur County Atornmey. The other is Megan Gaudette assistant county attorney and current employee of Brent Christain. Gaudette is good friends with Sally Schroer and protected her violation of the mothers rights. She is also the former employee and good friend of the presiding judge who is in the process of terminating the mothers rights.


when AB explains the mother has a right to have someone present on her behalf and the child protection worker  Carie Krenik who we are paying with our tax dollars to keep children safe and families together replies to AB with;

 If you don't like it get an attorney 

I HAVE A HUGE FLIPPING PROBLEM WITH THAT!!!!!! 


I just heard Carie Krenik a (HUMAN? service employee) Who is paid with my tax dollars for the purpose of  keeping our most vulnerable citizens safe, tell someone concerned about the safety of a traumatized mother that if she does not like the fact that they are violating the mothers civil rights she will need to get a lawyer!!! If we have to get lawyers to protect ourselves from human service workers, I think we have a big problem on our hands. These people are suppose to be there to help our most vulnerable citizens and they are paid for with our tax dollars to keep them safe. Yet we need to pay lawyers to protect ourselves from them We have to pay lawyer to stop human service worker from violating the rights of vulnerable citizens who are paid with our tax dollars ?

This is why I have been emailing Patty Fritz with all this documentation. We need reform.. If flipping ( Human?) service WORKERS ARE VIOLATING  people's rights, their families, their children, the elderly the lower income bracket class, the disabled we have a huge problem on our hands.

Not to mention the fact that they are taking peoples children and are not able to provide a viable reasons for a decisions they make. I guess if I were going to violate someone's rights I would have a ready answer as to why I was agreeing to victimize them. The County does not have one to provide.

SOCIAL WORKER CARIE KRENIK has no explanation as to why the visits are supervised by only a county worker. The isolated visits for just mom are violating her right to have someone present as a witness in case the visitation supervisor lies under oath for a preferred outcome.


Under normal circumstances  a child protection worker would have to be able to explain every action they make with a reason backing that action that promotes  the reunification of the mother and child and also keep them safe. 




The county documentation describes how much pain these kids are in



What happens when these kids are removed from the mentally unstable childless couples care. They will continue to use foster care as a shopping cart? Another community child/children with struggling parent/parents is going to again be at risk of being torn from a loving nurturing parent. They come out of a clean child proof age appropriate homes, with plenty of healthy food, with plenty of clean clothes and they are listed as being properly bathed kids at the time of their abduction. A mother who was rated by parent specialists in her termination of parental rights as a zero risk to ever abuse her children, and a mother who is loving and nurturing. Downfalls are learning age appropriate safety and is not comfortable with discipline. As mentioned earlier mom was severely abused so her fear of discipline is likely the result of fear of doing the same. Parenting classes would help her with that.

Get a lawyer to make a human service worker uphold the rights of  another human being... That was just brain numbing to hear. This is a day I will never forget... Now the dominos must fall. I want to thank Carie Krenik for allowing me to see what she does to people... It has been an enlightening experience. 

THIS QUOTE NEEDS TO BE TWEETED AND CREDITED TO THE CHILD PROTECTION WORKER I HAVE BEEN PAYING FOR.